Community

Share your automotive expertise

2 Write a Blog Post

Google Cars - What it Means for Dealers, Consumers, and the Industry

Today, ninety percent of all vehicle purchasers begin their shopping experience online. Undoubtedly, online automotive shopping has fundamentally changed the way people shop for vehicles and the strategies dealers use to market to and intercept those shoppers.  The process of shoppers being able to go online, enter their vehicle of interest, and then see vehicle listings with price and contact information has been an increasingly common practice since AutoTrader.com and Cars.com came on the scene in the mid-nineties.  But now, consumers are able to do all of that within the comfort of their own Google experience.

Google isn’t really anything new to the automotive shopping experience. Currently, two-thirds of all traffic to dealership websites comes from a Google search, but now they’re trying to actively extract some of the value from that statistic. The aptly titled Google Cars feature that has been running in beta since last summer, allows consumers to search for vehicles of choice with a handy filter box and get access to inventory, pricing, and dealership contact information. Think Cars.com or AutoTrader.com, but with arguably a sleeker look and more streamlined experience.

But this isn’t just another vendor frolicking into the industry. This is Google. So, what does Google having their hand in the automotive inventory publishing game really mean? Let’s take a close look at all the pros and cons.

Google Cars as a Lead Provider

Dealers who sign with Google can be listed in their inventory for no monthly or up-front charge, according to a recent Automotive News article. And many dealers have said that they like the new lead system generated by Google Cars. The handling is based on a bidding system, where dealers have the opportunity to bid a minimum of $10 for any particular lead, and even define a maximum cap that they’re willing to pay. This allows for a lot of flexibility for the dealers to purchase leads that may or may not be more important depending on the type of inventory their trying to move around.

But other dealers are questioning the effectiveness of those leads. In the name of consumer privacy, the only information that dealers receive is a first name, phone number, and email address. This might actually seem enticing, as many potential customers on your website don’t leave all that information; however, the contact information that the dealer receives is only a proxy, according to an article in the upcoming publication of DrivingSales’ Dealership Innovation Guide. The dealer receives a fake phone number that redirects the call to the customer’s real number, to which the dealership can only contact 6 times before the number is terminated, regardless of whether the customer answers or not. The same follows suit for the email address: 6 unanswered emails and the address goes bye-bye.

Because of the anonymity of the leads, some dealers feel those leads are less effective. The structure, although protecting the identity of the customer, negatively impacts the ability to do any long-term follow up, unless that dealership is able to extract more legitimate contact information before the time runs out.

In this day and age, when all a consumer wants on any purchase request is price, it’s becoming more and more important to find ways to sell your value proposition. This is another argument against the Google Cars model, that it’s difficult to convey the benefits of your store when your contact attempts are limited.  One dealer, in an Automotive News post, describes the difficulty as a result of Google “commoditizing” the car buying process.

Wait, that sounds familiar.  The last company that popped on the scene with the intention of becoming a lead provider in the online automotive retail market was tarred with the same accusations. TrueCar, anyone? Of course, TrueCar was forced to regroup and redefine themselves in a more dealer-friendly manner, due to both industry outcries and legal nuances. Still, it seems we’ve heard this story before.

Don’t get me wrong; Google may not be like TrueCar in practice or intention. Whereas TrueCar was providing specific information in such a manner to arouse dealers to grab their pitchforks, Google is managing the potential interactions between dealers and customers, forcing dealers to reevaluate their approach. One gruesome similarity is vendor access to the dealer’s DMS.

Google, the All-Powerful

The Google lead potential can be hugely beneficial to dealers because of its size, monster brand, and trust factor. Google frequently tops the charts when it comes to companies that people most trust. I mean, we’re okay with them putting driverless cars on the road, right? That’s testimony enough. So having your customers filter from the most trusted brand directly into yours can be tremendously valuable, and many dealers recognize that.  Google is almost too big of a name with which to not be involved.

But the inherent power of Google might be a double-edged sword. Google comprises over 70% of all searches on the web and can predict more consumer-shopping behavior than anyone out there.  And who has control over where search results land on any given search results page? You guessed it. Google does. So now, with all the hard work you’ve done to rank first on Page One when searching certain keywords, you’re not only pushed down below the sponsored links, but also below the newly inserted Google Inventory postings. And if your computer screen is the same size as mine, those items and the organic link listed first are the only visible links available without scrolling. So if you’re not number one, sayonara.

Is this fair? Is it right that Google can just put their own product up at the top and encourage traffic there? I mean, if I type in the name of a dealership such as ABC Ford, you better believe that Google’s Inventory on Fords shows up above the link for ABCFord.com, even though it’s that particular dealership that’s being searched. For all the hard work you’ve done to get to the top of the page, it seems Google has just side stepped their way to the top.

Google has previously been investigated for monopolistic tendencies with regard to these same practices.  They own so much of the search and ultimately have control over the algorithm, that the opportunity to run afoul is great.  However, the FTC declared in January of this year that they would be dropping all investigations against Google, stating the Google’s mission to provide the best answers for their users did not violate any antitrust or anticompetition statutes. Basically, it leaves a greater opportunity for Google to be even more aggressive with their Google Cars push and other products in various industries. 

Another Inventory Publisher

Not only does Google directly impact that dealer side of the industry, but it also has the potential to completely disrupt the current online automotive inventory publisher side of the business.  With so many shoppers starting their buying cycle online, predominantly on Google, it’s not far-fetched to think the consumers are going to stay within the Google platform instead of rummaging through all of the other big names like Cars.com, AutoTrader.com, Kelly Blue Book, and the others. 

Not only does Google’s brand and level of trust with consumers threaten other automotive inventory publishers, but their user experience does well.  Google is typically clean and uncluttered, but with regard to their Google Cars feature, customers won’t have to click through various menus or subheading to get the answers they want. It’s a streamlined process that’s almost entirely user-friendly.

Additionally, the lack of contracts required for dealers to post their inventory is hugely appealing to dealers and makes other subscription-based platforms seem less than enticing.  Will companies like AutoTrader.com and Cars.com be forced to modify their pricing strategy? The Cost Per Action Model is not new in the industry, but always exudes a shiny lure.

Not So Fast, Google

Success in inventory listings requires enough listings to make a market and enough shoppers to make it worthwhile for the dealers posting those listings. Google has a built-in supply of shoppers, but not so with inventory. Most of the several thousand people working at AutoTrader.com or Cars.com are there to help dealers. Google doesn’t provide this level of support, and it’s yet to be seen whether they can get sufficient inventory without it.

Tapping into the dealer’s DMS for inventory is no small thing, and most inventory publishers don’t require this. Getting some progressive Bay Area dealers to try the program is one thing. Getting the Chevy dealer in Burlington to sign on to the system and open up her DMS with virtually no human contact or support could prove to be more difficult.

The biggest challenge for Google will be new vehicle listings. No one has fully figured that out yet. An inventory publisher doesn’t need to get inventory from the local Volvo dealer to have at least some used Volvo listings. However, if there is only one Volvo dealer in the shopping radius, then there will not be any new Volvos listed. The same is true of manufacturer certified vehicles.

Inventory publishers generally list vehicles from private parties as well as dealers, not because there is any real money in private-party listings, but because it makes a better market and consumers are more trusting of sites that don’t look like they are just a tool of the dealers. The beneficiary is the dealers themselves. However, private-party listings require a great deal of fraud prevention effort to maintain the site’s credibility. The lack of it is what holds Craigslist back. But adding all this takes man-power. The number of people working on inventory listings at Google couldn’t run the mail room and janitorial service at AutoTrader.com. It really is that different, and moving fully into this business with a competitive level of support would require a culture shift for Google from technology provider to professional support.

How to Prepare

For the time being, it seems that Google Cars could become a major player in the space. Although they aren’t announcing any intent on expansion outside of the current northern California pocket, many experts have reason to believe it’s not far off. With their big brand, monstrous following, and lack of Federal investigations, Google is poised for a huge push in automotive retail.  So, what do dealers need to do to be prepared to ride the wave?

  • Dealers need to have their merchandising in tip-top shape. Customers are able to get so much information from their Google Inventory search with such ease, that it will be imperative for dealers to not miss a beat.
  • Customer service representatives might be the most important piece of this lead handling process.  Because the dealers have such a restricted ability to interact with the leads with any real information, the customer service personnel needs to be deftly skilled in building rapport with the customer quickly and create an environment of trust to be able to collect the person’s legitimate contact information as well as convey the store’s value proposition for why your dealership is the right place to buy.
  • Get your CRM in order. Tracking all of the lead handling will be imperative. Not only will you be paying based on the ability to prove Google made the introduction to your customer, but contact information will constantly be changing as proxy numbers are terminated and real contact information is collected.

Although in the past, Google has struggled with their attempts in the automotive vertical, they’re currently making great strides to position themselves as a permanent fixture for customers and dealers. And it has nothing to do with driverless cars.

Comments

How do we sign up to be a part of the BETA program on Google Cars?

Apr 8, 2013

Google Cars Reminds me of 2002… Doom & Gloom never happened…

This is so 2002… Back in the "early days" of the Internet, I ran an online e-tail site named SimplyCheap.com. We sold various closeout products and advertised via various comparison shopping sites (e.g. Yahoo! Shopping, PriceGrabber, Dealtime, etc…). I paid anywhere between 25 cents to $1.50/click, and $20K/month for premium placement on other shopping sites. To compete with shopping comparison sites, in 2002, Google launched a free comparison shopping engine called Froogle(Beta). As a merchant, I was excited by Froogle! It was a completely free lead provider that was powered by Google - why advertise anywhere else?

However, by the time I exited online retail in 2007, Froogle (now Google shopping) never became the behemoth that many expected. Why? While it was a powerful engine to find products, Froogle could not deliver the content and shopping experience that was provided by the specialty online shopping sites. For "showrooming" consumers, or consumers that were loyal to specific brands, Froogle became one of the best ways to find the lowest price. However, for consumers that searched for non-specific items, it wasn't as useful. While Froogle (now Google Shopping) still exists today, in my opinion, the site mainly benefits consumers that already know the specific items they want to buy (e.g. Sony DVP-SR510H) just before the transactional phase of the purchase process.

Car shopping is different.

Read more:
http://www.drivingsales.com/blogs/jeremy/2013/04/08/google-cars-reminds-me-2002-doom--gloom-never-happened

Apr 8, 2013

Shelby, The Google Cars program is not yet in the Milwaukee area, and I'm not sure how you will know when it is. That's part of the problem. There is no big team of Google people reaching out to dealers to tell them how the programs works best, what to expect from it, how to measure success, or even when the thing exists in your area. That may change, or maybe dealers will get used to self-serve models.

Apr 8, 2013

Jeremy, I agree. If I were going to place a bet on this it would be that Google never rolls this out nationally or collaborates with someone who already enjoys success in the market. I don't see the current model being a serious threat to existing models.

Nonetheless, many dealers want to know what changes are around the corner, or might be. I hope we are doing a good job of bring these stories in a balanced way, without all the hype. DrivingSales is a dealer community, not the kind of place where we try to increase visitation to the site using shock tactics. Your articles and comments contribute a great deal toward this strategy. Thank you for that and please keep it up!

Apr 8, 2013

Thanks Dennis!

Apr 8, 2013

Google seems to be demonized in this industry. Everyone seems focused on the fact that Google makes so much money. I have tested a similar program in another vertical (financial services) for credit cards. What some may see as a race to the bottom in a commoditized market, I see it as an opportunity to "fish where the fish are". Not all online customers are focused on price, truth is, the vast majority of all of our prospects are truly online customers. Some will need a pragmatic cost based approach to see if they are getting a good deal, some are definitely undecided when they inquire at our dealerships. It is our job to answer the right questions and move people along in the sales process where ever they are in it. Google is just providing another source of leads. Our dealership brands and reputations are the other legs of this stool. If you can make them all equal, you will succeed.

Apr 8, 2013

I should clarify that my comment above, ""showrooming" consumers, or consumers that were loyal to specific brands" should be ""showrooming" consumers, AND ALSO consumers that were loyal to specific brands." Sorry for the poor grammar skills.

Apr 9, 2013

it will be interesting to see how companies that only measure internet sales based upon the initial email address of the applicant will adjust to this new paradigm

Apr 19, 2013

Nice, informative post guys. Although there's still some debate as to whether this program will roll out nationwide, it's still worth looking carefully at how Google Cars works because certain aspects of the program may set the standard for how other lead providers and car shopping sites work in the future.

I wouldn't be surprised if the proxy/meterd Email Address and Phone Number feature of Google Cars catches on elsewhere. Do a simple twitter search using the words 'phone dealership' and/or 'email dealership' and you'll see a nice long stream of tweets that look something like this:

"The car dealership Terry called is a freaking stalker shop"

"Never again will I give a car dealership my phone number"

"Email a car dealership asking if they had an old wrangler.... No, but I do get three phone calls and several emails."

You get the point. We as car dealers have almost forced Google's hand and it makes me wonder why someone else hasn't implemented this feature before.

If you haven't tried out the Google Cars shopping service yourself, head over to my blog and I'll show you how to take Google Cars out for a test drive.

http://marketpunch.com/take-google-cars-out-for-a-test-drive/

Jun 8, 2013

Google Cars has been in the making for quite sometime, which speaks to the challenges they have faced actually getting automotive internet right. Attracting dealers to list vehicle inventories for free is fairly easy. Getting consumers to the Google Cars landing page (as they already start there at least two-thirds of the time any way) will not be hard either. The pressing issue will be the same as it has been - personnel. Google has yet to show the propensity to understand the automotive retail space. Many of the original team members at Google Automotive never even worked in dealership settings. The idea that simply listing cars is of benefit to Google, the dealer, or even the consumer is a farce. Unless Google gets out of the way and let's it run similar to Craigslist - as they are already doing in Nigeria (see http://www.google.com.ng/local/trader/#productoffers:pid=mg-8501966643075087801__3a5dfe6f0c962a67_), I agree it will either wane quickly or be turned over to the hands of some company more adept at handling automotive internet related ventures.

Jul 6, 2013

Comments 1 - 10 of 12

You must be logged in to comment

Login Create an account

Add your comments:

   

Lindsey Auguste and Dennis Galbraith's Recent Posts

Related Posts

  • The dealership sales and finance process has been built by dealers for dealers. Not consumers.

    There’s got to be a better way to sell a car. Everyone seems to think so.  In our recent dealer survey, 8 in 10 dealers agreed the time it takes to buy a car ought to take two hours or less but most say the average transaction time today is 3-4 hours from meet & greet to funded. The clear majority of these same dealers say that the biggest opportunity for change is to capture more information from the customer earlier in the process.   With the endless eCommerce sites available today, empowered ‘electronic’ shoppers have come to expect the transparency and immediate gratification made possible by the internet. It’s difficult for them to understand why buying a car still has to take so long. Most car shoppers today want to know what their payment terms will be while deciding on a vehicle, so it's completely illogical that dealerships make it virtually impossible for car shoppers to find financing information online.    Dealers should want to provide an easy, seamless...Read post

  • Why “Transparency” is Just Like Hard-Core Porn

    Writing a decision in a 1964 Supreme Court pornography case, Justice Potter Stewart wrote that some things are hard to put into words, hard to accurately define – and this is especially true of abstract ideas. So Stewart wrote one of the most famous phrases in court history “…I know it when I see it”. It’s interesting to note, that Stewart went on to say that the film question was not hard-core pornography. I think it is often easier to define what an abstract idea is not, than what it is.Read post

  • Make a Resolution to Provide Vehicle Education

    At OneCommand, we pride ourselves on developing new, creative ways for our clients to reach out, connect, and attract business. Several years ago, we developed a great way for our clients to accomplish this - providing vehicle education. Now I know what you’re thinking, “How will educating consumers about their vehicle bring more business to my store?” Check out these great tips to make a resolution to provide vehicle education. Be Relevant When providing vehicle education tips, be sure the content is relevant to your customers. Think about applicable services needed for a given season or time of year and be sure the information is pertinent to their specific model of vehicle. The more relevant you make your communication to the recipient, the more likely you’ll get your desired response. Include DIY Now this tip may seem like a complete oxymoron. The truth is, some services that need to be done on a vehicle a consumer can do without ever bringing it to a shop. However, an ev...Read post

  • Creating an All-Inclusive Dealership Experience

    Customer experience doesn't limit you to being compared to other dealerships; it compares you to every experience a customer has. You aren't just competing with the dealer down the road; you are competing with the coffee shop, grocery store, doctor’s office, and all-inclusive resort. Every industry is stepping up their customer experience game, and we especially in the automotive industry must do the same. Imagine if you could buy a vehicle while vacationing at an all-inclusive resort. What would that experience be like? Imagine that scenario, and then compare it to the process in your store; does it stand up? Read post

  • DMEautomotive Releases The Pocket Innovation: New eBook on Mobile Strategies

      Second edition of groundbreaking eBook includes new data on mobile user behavior and multiple best practices - from mobile payment to geo-fencing and beacon technology   Daytona Beach, FL –January 22, 2015 – DMEautomotive (DMEa), the company that has led the thought leadership charge when it comes to mobile strategies and technologies for automotive dealers, today announced the release of The Pocket Innovation, the second edition of the company’s very successful 2013 eBook The Pocket Revolution:  The Complete Guide to a Killer Mobile App.    Available for download today at DMEautomotive.com, The Pocket Innovation helps auto dealers easily navigate the rapidly evolving mobile marketplace and is chock full of new data on mobile user behavior direct from the marketing scientists in DMEa's Strategy & Analytics department, as well as from respected third party sources. In addition, the book includes multiple best practices for mobile - including the difference betwee...Read post

  • Thanks to the DrivingSales Community for a Successful 2014

    We would like to thank each and every one of our DrivingSales Community members for propelling us forward in 2014. With registered users in over 60% of dealerships nationwide, and three times the online user traffic of the next largest community, DrivingSales.com has become the leading network for collaboration, product reviews, and industry trends as the central piece of the DrivingSales media division. And we have you to thank. In 2014, DrivingSales launched two new businesses that rapidly achieved critical mass.   DrivingSales News premiered in August 2014, exclusively reporting on the intersection between retail automotive and technology innovation. DrivingSales News produces over 100 video stories and articles each month and, in less than four months, has grown to deliver news to one-third of US dealerships. DrivingSales Data launched in June 2014 and is the industry’s first free cross-channel marketing analytics service, integrated directly with the industry’s major m...Read post

  • AUTOSOFT FLEX DMS wins BEST DMS AWARD with DrivingSales “HIGHEST RATED” Dealer Satisfaction Honor

    Autosoft, Inc. Flex DMS has received the “Highest Rated” Dealership Management System Award in the sixth annual DrivingSales Dealer Satisfaction Awards, presented at a special event today in conjunction with the 2015 National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) Convention & Expo. Autosoft, Inc. Flex DMS received the highest dealer satisfaction ranking in the Dealership Management System category, as determined by the thousands of auto dealers who are part of the DrivingSales.com community.Read post

  • 2014 DrivingSales Dealer Satisfaction Award Recipients Announced

    Awards recognize dealer satisfaction with products / services in 14 categories; presented at special ceremony in conjunction with the 2015 NADA Convention       San Francisco, CA – January 22nd, 2015 – The sixth annual DrivingSales Dealer Satisfaction Awards were presented at a special ceremony today in conjunction with the 2015 National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) Convention & Expo in San Francisco. The awards measure dealer satisfaction with products and services provided by vendors in 2014 in 14 categories, including Chat Products, CRM, New Car Leads, Reputation Management, SEO, Used Car Advertising, Websites, SEO and more. Vendors who achieved the highest dealer satisfaction rankings received “Highest Rated” or “Top Rated” awards. The awards are based on DrivingSales Vendor Ratings, which comprise 21,000 validated user reviews.   “This marks the sixth anniversary of the Dealer Satisfaction awards, and we are so impressed with the breadth of serv...Read post