Community

Share your automotive expertise

2 Write a Blog Post

OPINION: CARFAX is extorting my dealership...

CARFAX provides stickers to place on our pre-owned vehicles. This is a shot of a sticker attached to a key cabinet in our office. We do not place these stickers on our cars, as we feel the image of the CARFOX is not consistent with BMW’s brand values.

Originally published on October 3, 2012.

 

 

Please click here for my most current CARFAX post.

Last month, after an extensive comparison of nearly 6,000 VINs, BMW of North America concluded that AutoCheck’s Vehicle History Reports were just as reliable as CARFAX reports. Finally, after years of only supporting CARFAX, BMW’s mandate for Dealers to use CarFax for Certified BMWs was over.  This meant, that as a BMW Dealer, I could now choose either CarFax or Experian’s Service (AutoCheck) as my vehicle history report provider.

So why would I want to change?

The answer is simple. Last month, I paid CARFAX $2,575.49 to provide unlimited Vehicle History Reports for my dealership. In comparison, as part of a discount agreement with BMW, AutoCheck offers their version of the same service for $1098/month – a savings of over 50% per month - and at a price that was guaranteed for at least 1 year. Suffice it to say, I was delighted by the potential savings!

So, I immediately contacted my CARFAX rep with an ultimatum – I demanded that CARFAX either price their services more competitively or consider my contract cancelled. The response I received was unconscionable - my CARFAX rep explained that the monthly price would NOT be lowered and if I chose to leave CARFAX, then my ability to compete effectively on Cars.com and AutoTrader.com would be severely impaired.

How is this possible?

Evidently, CARFAX pays AutoTrader.com and Cars.com a huge stipend to be the “sole” provider of vehicle history reports on these two marketplaces. Apparently, as part of this agreement, AutoTrader.com/Cars.com cannot display AutoCheck Reports(even if AutoCheck is the provider at the dealer’s store), but they can display CARFAX reports for CARFAX participating dealers. As my CARFAX rep explained, with the vast amount of competitor’s inventory  on AutoTrader.com/Cars.com, my decision to not show a vehicle history report (when my competitors are in fact showing these reports), would indicate to consumers that my dealership had “something to hide” and push customers away from my listings. I understand transparency and I knew she was right - I was livid.

It is my opinion, that CARFAX is using Cars.com/AutoTrader.com as means to extort dealers into paying higher fees for CARFAX’s services – all while Cars.com and AutoTrader.com receive a handsome tariff. Does this sound like an unfair, anti-competitive, or potentially illegal trade practice? I thought so.

This week, I spoke with Alex Vetter(VP of Cars.com) and Jeff Catron(Director of Dealer Strategy at AutoTrader.com). I explained to both executives, that is my opinion, that I’m currently being extorted by CARFAX. I explained that unless a fair resolution is offered, I intend to file a complaint with the FTC against all parties. They both listened to my feedback, and they said they’ll consider it closely, but they would not provide a definite decision. (Note: In my past experiences with Alex Vetter, he has always been fair and equitable in his dealings – I’m optimistic that Cars.com will protect the interests of the franchised dealer).

Why is this a big deal? Can’t you sell your inventory elsewhere?

Still today, I have a very favorable opinion of Cars.com, I receive plenty of business from the site each month. And while my opinion of AutoTrader.com is not favorable and regularly worsening(thanks to my opinion of their pre-IPO cash out), I can’t ignore that AutoTrader does in fact generate business for my dealership and still remains an online behemoth. At least as it applies to my dealership, leaving both of these sites would severely harm my effectivness in selling pre-owned cars.  Moreover, as I explained earlier, in today’s transparent and instant information environment, the used car shopper will ignore dealers that cannot quickly and easily provide history reports substantiating the condition of their vehicles - especially when other dealers do. And in fact, according to our CARFAX rep, from January 2012 to August 2012 my dealership has received 17,466 ICR’s  - or as she explained, the reports ran by consumers viewing inventory on AutoTrader.com and Cars.com. (Note:  I asked for a specific breakdown, and CARFAX has not supplied this data. In addition, for comparison purposes, I sold about 700 used vehicles during this same period).

The exact magnitude of this problem is far reaching. There are nearly 18,000 franchised dealers in the US that may be in a similar or even worse situation. I feel that dealers should not be forced to pay an unfair premium to CARFAX in order to market their vehicles and compete online. Moreover, Cars.com and AutoTrader.com should align their business model with the interests of their most valuable customers - the dealers. We paid the monthly fees that allowed Cars.com and AutoTrader.com to flourish – we should not be penalized as a result.

Disclaimers:
• Opinions AND VIEWS SET FORTH HEREIN  are my own AND DO NOT REPRESENTS FACTS.   SUCH OPINIONS AND VIEWS COULD BE WRONG. They do not represent the companies named or cited in this blog.
• I am not a lawyer. This information, especially legal advice, can be completely incorrect. No warranties are provided or expressed. Any reliance on such information is solely at your own risk.
• I am not privy to ANY details of the backend operations/analytics of any site mentioned in this blog
• This blog does not provide financial advice, and should not be interpreted as such.
• All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.

Comments

Jeremy, one alternative might be to "brand" your first image (thumbnail image) with an AutoCheck logo. This way on the Search Results Page consumers could see that you have this. If you used Dealer Specialties, we could do this for you, other providers can also likely do the same.

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy, you hit the nail on the head. I share your exact observations. They are definitely taking advantage of dealers. I refused to pay carfax what they wanted. If you file a complaint with the FTC, lets have the NADA and various state dealer associations know about this, to support a solution to this potentially unfair trade practice or anti-trust situation.

Oct 4, 2012

Autotrader and cars.com should know that Google Autos is in test mode with a handful of west coast dealers. Once it goes national things could and probably will change. We are considering dropping the lower performing site and giving Google Autos a try. Imagine what would happen if all dealers dropped cars.com or autotrader! Consumers would still buy cars, they just would go elsewhere to find them!

Oct 4, 2012

Another example of a corporate cult trying to impose its will on the marketplace. Got to love BMW's solid business decision.

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy understands the power of branding for his own purposes. He pays BMW a huge premium over an alternative auto maker so that he can leverage the investment BMW has made over the years in their brand. He pays Autotrader.com and Cars.com a huge premium over a lesser trafficked inventory site to leverage the investment they have made in their brands. I'm confused why he doesn't wish to apply the same logic to Carfax?

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy understands the power of branding for his own purposes. He pays BMW a huge premium over an alternative auto maker so that he can leverage the investment BMW has made over the years in their brand. He pays Autotrader.com and Cars.com a huge premium over a lesser trafficked inventory site to leverage the investment they have made in their brands. I'm confused why he doesn't wish to apply the same logic to Carfax?

Oct 4, 2012

Hey Philip,

Thanks for the comment and reading my post. First, in the interests of full disclosure, I'd like to clarify if this is the same Philip Moore that lists his occupation on LinkedIn as the Director of Strategic Insights at Carfax? Second, to answer your question, I absolutely understand the importance and complexity of branding, and I'll address your concern.

While many car shoppers may know CARFAX, I feel many more shoppers know that Experian is the company that supplies their personal credit report - the same company that is supplying the "credit score" necessary to finance the car they're researching – never mind the same score for other important life decisions (e.g. mortgage, loans, etc...) Second, from a high-line standpoint, it is my opinion that your CARFOX icon damages many premium brands - I certainly will not promote it at my dealership. Finally, one more point, I've seen many of your TV ads that, in my opinion, attempt to portray car dealers as untrustworthy and unscrupulous businesses - and therefore pushes consumers to trust CARFAX over the dealer. So, to answer your question, yes I understand branding and it's my opinion that CARFAX, as an overall brand, is not stronger than AutoCheck/Experian.

Thank you,
Jeremy

Oct 4, 2012

We tried carfax for 6 months and made no difference. So we are using autocheck and we have sold more cars than ever. I think that the idea of getting the autocheck logo in the first picture it's a great.

Oct 4, 2012

Here are 2 things that Carfax offers that I'm surprised don't get mentioned very often:

1. They provide a "Warranty Check" that lists all of the warranties that are on each vehicle.

2. They tell you if there are any opened recalls on the vehicle.

Is there an economical way to get this information without the Carfax? If you have to spend 20 minutes on the phone for each vehicle you don't know the exact warranties on, that could take a long time and there could always be issues with vehicles if you sell it to a customer and it has an opened recall on it.

Oct 4, 2012

I recommended the change from Carfax to AutoCheck at my previous dealer group and we currently use AutoCheck at our dealership. The issue has never been customer interest in a Carfax; when handed an AutoCheck report, customers are fine. The real issue is that because Carfax has an exclusive program with AutoTrader and Cars.com, our inventory has the "Get a Carfax Record Check" link instead of the snappy logo and "View the free Carfax report". As a result, and as the Carfax rep points out, online shoppers may think there's something to hide.

That AutoTrader and Cars.com have sold the exclusive right to extort money from dealers is true evil. That the best sales position Carfax can take is that they are the only choice is sad. My experience is that people that use both AutoCheck and Carfax actually prefer AutoCheck. For consumers, of course, that's not so much an option on AutoTrader or Cars.com.

Oct 4, 2012

Comments 1 - 10 of 39

You must be logged in to comment

Login Create an account

Add your comments:

   

Jeremy Alicandri's Recent Posts

Related Posts

  • 10 Stats Your BDC Should Live By

    ​For inbound marketing, leads determine success. The assumption is that the higher the lead volume and percentage, the higher the sales and service volume. All too often, these do not go in step with each other. Below we identify ten statistics that are the main cause of increased lead quantity not equating to increases in appointment shows and sales.   1. Setting an appointment at the time the lead is converted will increase show rate 37 percent. – This seems like a no brainer, doesn’t it? If the customer commits to the appointment at the time they submit the lead, there is a very powerful psychological affect.   Step 1: Lead Submitted   Step 2: Appointment Made   2. 37 percent of all automotive leads are never responded to. – WOW! That is a scary stat! When you consider that the real average cost of afirst-party lead is close to $100, for 37 percent to hit the floor is absolutely unacceptable. By “responded”, we simply mean that a call is placed from the d...Read post

  • A Simple Solution to Showrooming

    Bob is on his lunch break. Lately, he has been drooling over the latest high-tech camera so he decides to make a quick trip to Best Buy to check it out. He walks into Best Buy and heads to the camera department. Once there, he finds the camera on display, but no employees are in sight to explain it to him. He picks it up, plays with it for a while and decides to buy one. With limited time, Bob rushes back to his office. As he settles back at his desk, Bob surfs over to Amazon and finds the camera to read some reviews. The glowing reviews, combined with the fact that it’s a few dollars cheaper, make him pull the trigger and order one from Amazon. CNBC ran an article recently on the results of a new study by Gallup, “The State of the American Consumer.” In that report, “Gallup research has shown that customers only shop based on price when price is the only thing that separates competing offerings. In other words, customers shop based on price when there is no emotional conn...Read post

  • Fixed Ops: The Scramble for Technicians Begins

    In May I wrote a blog article explaining how employee retention in service will become increasingly important due to many factors. Apparently, that’s becoming true faster than even I thought. Automotive News published an article last week reporting that AutoNation and the Asbury Automotive Group are indeed discovering that skilled technicians are becoming harder to find. “In terms of roadblocks, obviously the biggest single roadblock, if you have facilities in place, would be the number of technicians,” said Michael Kearney, Asbury Automotive Group’s executive vice president and COO. Mike Jackson, AutoNation’s chairman and CEO agreed, stating that “it has proven difficult to hire qualified technicians.” While some of this increased demand can be attributed to the tens of millions of recalls that have been issued this year, some also has to do with a desire to expand the dealership’s service offerings. According to Automotive News, Asbury has chosen to create their own...Read post

  • (Video) Auto Loans: The Next Subprime Crisis?

    The subprime housing crisis of the late 2000s caused havoc for the world economy. Are low lending standards by U.S. auto dealers in conjunction with banks leading the country towards what could be another...Read post

  • 6 Ways to Not Suck on Facebook

    You dedicate at least an hour of your day on your dealership’s Facebook business page. You chime in on posts about the auto industry, you change your profile and background photos, you post 8 times a day - YOU ARE COMMITTED. So why aren’t people liking your page?Read post

  • Auto/Mate Honored with Platinum Award in Auto Dealer Monthly's Dealers' Choice Awards

    ALBANY, N.Y. – July 28th, 2014 – Auto/Mate Dealership Systems (http://www.automate.com), a premier dealership management system (DMS) provider, has received a "Platinum" award in the 2014 Auto Dealer Monthly Dealers' Choice Awards. This year marks the first time that Auto/Mate was honored with a top ranking in the magazine's annual award program that recognizes the industry's best product and service providers as selected by hundreds of dealers and dealership personnel.   "To receive this recognition is a real honor because the votes for Auto/Mate came from our customers, and this Platinum award lets me know that we are successful in our primary goal which is to be the top dealership management system provider in customer satisfaction," said Mike Esposito, President and CEO of Auto/Mate.   In May, voters weighed in to recognize their favorite partners in 27 categories. Providers were scored on the product or service itself, customer support and service, value, and whether the...Read post

  • Autosoft Certifies Traffic Cop as First CRM/ILM Provider to Integrate with FLEX DMS

    Autosoft, Inc., a leading national dealer solutions provider, announces that Traffic Cop LLC has earned certification for integration with the FLEX dealer management system (DMS) as part of Autosoft’s FLEX Connect program. Traffic Cop is the first customer relationship management (CRM) and Internet lead management (ILM) showroom-to-shop management software to earn this certification. The certification process required collaboration and development between Autosoft and Traffic Cop, resulting in a more integrated CRM solution for FLEX DMS dealers using the Traffic Cop solution. Autosoft’s Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer Mark Hellbusch views the integration as an additional value for Autosoft’s FLEX DMS dealers. “This certified integration provides our valued customers with a tested, secure, and verified means for further developing their relationships with customers and prospects,” Hellbusch said. Among other features, this integration allows dealership users to send deals from the desk straight to Autosoft’s FLEX F&I, and refreshes the record in Traffic Cop after delivery to the business office. Users will be able to view full customer service records in Traffic Cop to optimize customer relationships throughout their lifecycle.Read post

  • Autosoft Announces New Nissan Integration

    WEST MIDDLESEX, PA – July 17, 2014 – Leading dealer management system (DMS) provider Autosoft, Inc., (www.autosoft-asi.com) has announced that the Autosoft FLEX DMS has been approved for integration with the new dealer communication system that Nissan is rolling out to dealers. "Our goal is to offer the advantage of strong integration between Autosoft’s FLEX DMS and the systems our customers use to manage a successful business," said Mark Hellbusch, executive vice president and chief technology officer for Autosoft. He stressed the integration approval’s strategic value to Autosoft’s Nissan dealership customers, saying, "We are pleased to be approved by Nissan for integration with their new dealer communication system and are committed to aligning with their roadmap so Nissan dealers will experience the most efficient processes possible."Read post