Community

Share your automotive expertise

2 Write a Blog Post

OPINION: CARFAX is extorting my dealership...

CARFAX provides stickers to place on our pre-owned vehicles. This is a shot of a sticker attached to a key cabinet in our office. We do not place these stickers on our cars, as we feel the image of the CARFOX is not consistent with BMW’s brand values.

Originally published on October 3, 2012.

 

 

Please click here for my most current CARFAX post.

Last month, after an extensive comparison of nearly 6,000 VINs, BMW of North America concluded that AutoCheck’s Vehicle History Reports were just as reliable as CARFAX reports. Finally, after years of only supporting CARFAX, BMW’s mandate for Dealers to use CarFax for Certified BMWs was over.  This meant, that as a BMW Dealer, I could now choose either CarFax or Experian’s Service (AutoCheck) as my vehicle history report provider.

So why would I want to change?

The answer is simple. Last month, I paid CARFAX $2,575.49 to provide unlimited Vehicle History Reports for my dealership. In comparison, as part of a discount agreement with BMW, AutoCheck offers their version of the same service for $1098/month – a savings of over 50% per month - and at a price that was guaranteed for at least 1 year. Suffice it to say, I was delighted by the potential savings!

So, I immediately contacted my CARFAX rep with an ultimatum – I demanded that CARFAX either price their services more competitively or consider my contract cancelled. The response I received was unconscionable - my CARFAX rep explained that the monthly price would NOT be lowered and if I chose to leave CARFAX, then my ability to compete effectively on Cars.com and AutoTrader.com would be severely impaired.

How is this possible?

Evidently, CARFAX pays AutoTrader.com and Cars.com a huge stipend to be the “sole” provider of vehicle history reports on these two marketplaces. Apparently, as part of this agreement, AutoTrader.com/Cars.com cannot display AutoCheck Reports(even if AutoCheck is the provider at the dealer’s store), but they can display CARFAX reports for CARFAX participating dealers. As my CARFAX rep explained, with the vast amount of competitor’s inventory  on AutoTrader.com/Cars.com, my decision to not show a vehicle history report (when my competitors are in fact showing these reports), would indicate to consumers that my dealership had “something to hide” and push customers away from my listings. I understand transparency and I knew she was right - I was livid.

It is my opinion, that CARFAX is using Cars.com/AutoTrader.com as means to extort dealers into paying higher fees for CARFAX’s services – all while Cars.com and AutoTrader.com receive a handsome tariff. Does this sound like an unfair, anti-competitive, or potentially illegal trade practice? I thought so.

This week, I spoke with Alex Vetter(VP of Cars.com) and Jeff Catron(Director of Dealer Strategy at AutoTrader.com). I explained to both executives, that is my opinion, that I’m currently being extorted by CARFAX. I explained that unless a fair resolution is offered, I intend to file a complaint with the FTC against all parties. They both listened to my feedback, and they said they’ll consider it closely, but they would not provide a definite decision. (Note: In my past experiences with Alex Vetter, he has always been fair and equitable in his dealings – I’m optimistic that Cars.com will protect the interests of the franchised dealer).

Why is this a big deal? Can’t you sell your inventory elsewhere?

Still today, I have a very favorable opinion of Cars.com, I receive plenty of business from the site each month. And while my opinion of AutoTrader.com is not favorable and regularly worsening(thanks to my opinion of their pre-IPO cash out), I can’t ignore that AutoTrader does in fact generate business for my dealership and still remains an online behemoth. At least as it applies to my dealership, leaving both of these sites would severely harm my effectivness in selling pre-owned cars.  Moreover, as I explained earlier, in today’s transparent and instant information environment, the used car shopper will ignore dealers that cannot quickly and easily provide history reports substantiating the condition of their vehicles - especially when other dealers do. And in fact, according to our CARFAX rep, from January 2012 to August 2012 my dealership has received 17,466 ICR’s  - or as she explained, the reports ran by consumers viewing inventory on AutoTrader.com and Cars.com. (Note:  I asked for a specific breakdown, and CARFAX has not supplied this data. In addition, for comparison purposes, I sold about 700 used vehicles during this same period).

The exact magnitude of this problem is far reaching. There are nearly 18,000 franchised dealers in the US that may be in a similar or even worse situation. I feel that dealers should not be forced to pay an unfair premium to CARFAX in order to market their vehicles and compete online. Moreover, Cars.com and AutoTrader.com should align their business model with the interests of their most valuable customers - the dealers. We paid the monthly fees that allowed Cars.com and AutoTrader.com to flourish – we should not be penalized as a result.

Disclaimers:
• Opinions AND VIEWS SET FORTH HEREIN  are my own AND DO NOT REPRESENTS FACTS.   SUCH OPINIONS AND VIEWS COULD BE WRONG. They do not represent the companies named or cited in this blog.
• I am not a lawyer. This information, especially legal advice, can be completely incorrect. No warranties are provided or expressed. Any reliance on such information is solely at your own risk.
• I am not privy to ANY details of the backend operations/analytics of any site mentioned in this blog
• This blog does not provide financial advice, and should not be interpreted as such.
• All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.

Comments

Jeremy, one alternative might be to "brand" your first image (thumbnail image) with an AutoCheck logo. This way on the Search Results Page consumers could see that you have this. If you used Dealer Specialties, we could do this for you, other providers can also likely do the same.

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy, you hit the nail on the head. I share your exact observations. They are definitely taking advantage of dealers. I refused to pay carfax what they wanted. If you file a complaint with the FTC, lets have the NADA and various state dealer associations know about this, to support a solution to this potentially unfair trade practice or anti-trust situation.

Oct 4, 2012

Autotrader and cars.com should know that Google Autos is in test mode with a handful of west coast dealers. Once it goes national things could and probably will change. We are considering dropping the lower performing site and giving Google Autos a try. Imagine what would happen if all dealers dropped cars.com or autotrader! Consumers would still buy cars, they just would go elsewhere to find them!

Oct 4, 2012

Another example of a corporate cult trying to impose its will on the marketplace. Got to love BMW's solid business decision.

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy understands the power of branding for his own purposes. He pays BMW a huge premium over an alternative auto maker so that he can leverage the investment BMW has made over the years in their brand. He pays Autotrader.com and Cars.com a huge premium over a lesser trafficked inventory site to leverage the investment they have made in their brands. I'm confused why he doesn't wish to apply the same logic to Carfax?

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy understands the power of branding for his own purposes. He pays BMW a huge premium over an alternative auto maker so that he can leverage the investment BMW has made over the years in their brand. He pays Autotrader.com and Cars.com a huge premium over a lesser trafficked inventory site to leverage the investment they have made in their brands. I'm confused why he doesn't wish to apply the same logic to Carfax?

Oct 4, 2012

Hey Philip,

Thanks for the comment and reading my post. First, in the interests of full disclosure, I'd like to clarify if this is the same Philip Moore that lists his occupation on LinkedIn as the Director of Strategic Insights at Carfax? Second, to answer your question, I absolutely understand the importance and complexity of branding, and I'll address your concern.

While many car shoppers may know CARFAX, I feel many more shoppers know that Experian is the company that supplies their personal credit report - the same company that is supplying the "credit score" necessary to finance the car they're researching – never mind the same score for other important life decisions (e.g. mortgage, loans, etc...) Second, from a high-line standpoint, it is my opinion that your CARFOX icon damages many premium brands - I certainly will not promote it at my dealership. Finally, one more point, I've seen many of your TV ads that, in my opinion, attempt to portray car dealers as untrustworthy and unscrupulous businesses - and therefore pushes consumers to trust CARFAX over the dealer. So, to answer your question, yes I understand branding and it's my opinion that CARFAX, as an overall brand, is not stronger than AutoCheck/Experian.

Thank you,
Jeremy

Oct 4, 2012

We tried carfax for 6 months and made no difference. So we are using autocheck and we have sold more cars than ever. I think that the idea of getting the autocheck logo in the first picture it's a great.

Oct 4, 2012

Here are 2 things that Carfax offers that I'm surprised don't get mentioned very often:

1. They provide a "Warranty Check" that lists all of the warranties that are on each vehicle.

2. They tell you if there are any opened recalls on the vehicle.

Is there an economical way to get this information without the Carfax? If you have to spend 20 minutes on the phone for each vehicle you don't know the exact warranties on, that could take a long time and there could always be issues with vehicles if you sell it to a customer and it has an opened recall on it.

Oct 4, 2012

I recommended the change from Carfax to AutoCheck at my previous dealer group and we currently use AutoCheck at our dealership. The issue has never been customer interest in a Carfax; when handed an AutoCheck report, customers are fine. The real issue is that because Carfax has an exclusive program with AutoTrader and Cars.com, our inventory has the "Get a Carfax Record Check" link instead of the snappy logo and "View the free Carfax report". As a result, and as the Carfax rep points out, online shoppers may think there's something to hide.

That AutoTrader and Cars.com have sold the exclusive right to extort money from dealers is true evil. That the best sales position Carfax can take is that they are the only choice is sad. My experience is that people that use both AutoCheck and Carfax actually prefer AutoCheck. For consumers, of course, that's not so much an option on AutoTrader or Cars.com.

Oct 4, 2012

Comments 1 - 10 of 39

You must be logged in to comment

Login Create an account

Add your comments:

   

Jeremy Alicandri's Recent Posts

Related Posts

  • Igniting Ideas – Fueling Collaboration

    Dealers across the country report over 50,000 new car sales each day. Each sale represents the end of a customer sales journey. Over weeks – or even months – each customer conducts research, interacts with brands, and ultimately moves through the process of completing the sale. Dozens – if not hundreds – of dealers, OEMS, vendors and companies influence the customer along the way. For example, in the media alone, competing advertising messages impact the customer at each level:  OEM, Dealer Association, and individual dealership. The path to purchase is complex, and yet, it all comes together. One sale at a time. The complexity of our cross-tier community sparked the idea for this column. My goal is to building a community where people in our industry can come together and strengthen collaborative relationships across the tiers - especially between dealers and OEMs. This column is quite literally meant to spark conversation, ignite ideas, and fuel collaboration. What wi...Read post

  • Canadian Dealership’s Reality TV Show Comes to DrivingSales Event

    At DrivingSales we advocate that dealers operate transparently to cultivate trust with their customers. You cannot get more transparent than have a nationally broadcasted reality TV show in your dealership. Ride Time in Winnipeg, MB (that’s in Canada for you southerners) was the backdrop for the reality show The Bargain Brothers on Business News Network (BNN). Two brothers Andrew and Doug MacIver are the stars and owners of the dealership with their family making up a large portion of their staff. Needless to say having the camera running all the time in a family owned dealership makes for some interesting moments. However, the self declared “Bargain Brothers” see their dedication to telling their story through TV and social media as a way to stay in the forefront of their customers’ minds. “Branding is a point of differentiation for every dealership,” says Andrew MacIver. “It's how you're perceived in the local market and often tells the tale of how you do business. W...Read post

  • Service Dilemmas: What Would You Do?

    Every dealership has seen this customer—the one who demands to be reimbursed for damage they claim happened while the car was in the dealership’s care, or because of faulty service work. You might find it challenging to deal with these customers, especially when you don’t believe your team is at fault. So what is the best way to handle them?   To help answer this question, I have compiled a couple of scenarios. I happen to know how these cases were handled, and I will share the results in my next blog. But first I want your feedback on what these dealerships should’ve done. These are both 100% real events involving simple oil changes that happened just this past Memorial Day weekend. So, my question is: What would you do?   Scenario #1:   A customer brought their vehicle into the dealership the Friday before Memorial Day weekend for a routine oil change. As part of the check-in process, the service advisor rolled down the window to prevent the keys from getting locke...Read post

  • Do Press Releases Still Have SEO Value?

    The quick answer to the question is not so much anymore. These days press releases are branding, validation, and credibility tools for companies, not SEO tools.  Quite simply it means PR firms are shifting the focus of how they utilize press releases for their clients.   Companies have been utilizing press releases for over 100 years.  Initially a press release was a way to get information to the news media.  They were rarely seen by the public and were not created to be an advertisement. The point was to get the media’s attention about a story or news worthy event gets them to write about it. To accomplish this, organizations had to write a release that had real news value.   The Internet, along with media channels, blogs and social networks, has changed the press release landscape.  Company branding, pushing content, infographics and press releases became a tool in the SEO arsenal. This shift led to a glut of releases that were no longer “real news,” but promotional c...Read post

  • Recall Masters Launches Rambo; New Platform Revolutionizes Recall Marketing Industry for Auto Dealers

    Recall Masters, Inc., today announced the launch of Rambo, a revolutionary new platform that offers the most complete recall marketing program available for auto dealers. Rambo attracts new customers every month and enables auto dealers to effectively drive more sales and service revenue from vehicle owners motivated by factory recalls. According to CARFAX’s annual research, more than 46 million cars nationwide have at least one safety recall that’s never been fixed. Rambo is a cost-effective platform that markets to these consumers and brings in new customers for far less than what most auto dealers are currently paying. Rambo markets dealer sales and service in a whole new way. Unlike conventional prospecting programs, it harnesses the sense of urgency associated with vehicle recalls to attract vehicle owners with open recalls into a dealership. “With Rambo we create opportunities to attract new customers, generate more revenue from recall repairs, upsell service based on vehicle maintenance and convert higher mileage and older vehicles into new car sales for our auto dealer clients. Dealers can begin welcoming new customers in just two weeks,” said Chris Miller, President of Recall Masters. Rambo interfaces directly with OEMs to perform batch recall lookups by VIN. It learns which mandatory recalls are performed, unperformed, or expired and oftentimes what involuntary recalls exist for a specific VIN. Recall Masters also supplements and verifies its VIN‐recall match prRead post

  • Confident Financial Solutions Appoints Dan Beres as Vice President National Sales

    Confident Financial Solutions (CFS), a leading developer of high quality financial solutions for automotive service centers and their customers, today announced that it has appointed Dan Beres as Vice President of National Sales. Beres joins an existing group of highly experienced professionals in the automotive industry and brings his expertise to his new role. He will be responsible for driving the creation and management of the company sales channels. Prior to joining CFS, Beres held the role of Executive Vice President at MyCustomerData for seven years, where he created, developed and managed the sales force from three to 25 salespeople and was responsible for the company’s explosive sales growth at that time. He also initiated and developed vendor approved relationships with BMW, MINI, and Volvo, while managing an existing relationship with Mercedes-Benz. Previous to that, Beres held the role of Director of Sales for DMEautomotive, where he brought on seven new accounts in less than three months, drove over $1 million in revenue and was named the Top New Business Producer of the Year. Before joining DMEautomotive, Beres served for five years as the National Sales Director at Who’s Calling, Inc., where he drove sales from $3 million to $42 million in revenue in less than three years. Read post

  • Need a Raise? It’s Sitting Right In Front of You!

    Do you know anyone who would not say that they would like to make more money? I know I don’t! This does not surprise me, as I believe that money is a motivator for us all. Those who don’t admit it are lying about it. Depending on which source you trust, the average automotive salesperson in the U.S. makes anywhere between $38k and $61k per year - Glassdoor.com quotes an average of $47,852. We all know folks at the lower end of that spectrum, and many of us may know (or are ourselves) the superstar who makes far more than the upper end. But, for the most part, I think most would agree with me that car salespeople’s wages generally do not reflect how many hours they work. There is plenty of chatter on automotive blog sites and social media pages about pay plans, commission structure, doing away with commission altogether, scheduling flexibility, bonus and spiff compensation, blah, blah, blah. Listen, it all comes down to this: You are trading with your employer; your time for their money! Read post

  • Banish Bullying Behavior for Long-Term Success

    We love our sayings in the auto industry. From “the feel of the wheel seals the deal” to “I like meat – if I don’t sell I don’t eat,” we have a ton of them. While many of these sayings are harmless, others work to promote a bullying culture that can hurt your business. A perfect example is the phrase “green pea” to refer to a new sales consultant. Industry veterans use put-downs like this, and other aggressive language, to gain dominance over newbies and protect their turf. However, the effects of harassment are widespread and may include pushing promising new talent out of the industry, turning-off customers who overhear foul language, and even depressing sales. If you want to attract the best talent, engage a more diverse customer base, and sell more, you’d be smart to tap down the scorn directed at new sales consultants. Schoolyard bullying tactics keep our industry stagnant at a time when what we really need is new blood, new ideas, more diversity of ethnicity ...Read post