Community

Share your automotive expertise

2 Write a Blog Post

OPINION: CARFAX is extorting my dealership...

By Jeremy Alicandri on Dec 5, 2012

CARFAX provides stickers to place on our pre-owned vehicles. This is a shot of a sticker attached to a key cabinet in our office. We do not place these stickers on our cars, as we feel the image of the CARFOX is not consistent with BMW’s brand values.

Originally published on October 3, 2012.

 

 

Please click here for my most current CARFAX post.

Last month, after an extensive comparison of nearly 6,000 VINs, BMW of North America concluded that AutoCheck’s Vehicle History Reports were just as reliable as CARFAX reports. Finally, after years of only supporting CARFAX, BMW’s mandate for Dealers to use CarFax for Certified BMWs was over.  This meant, that as a BMW Dealer, I could now choose either CarFax or Experian’s Service (AutoCheck) as my vehicle history report provider.

So why would I want to change?

The answer is simple. Last month, I paid CARFAX $2,575.49 to provide unlimited Vehicle History Reports for my dealership. In comparison, as part of a discount agreement with BMW, AutoCheck offers their version of the same service for $1098/month – a savings of over 50% per month - and at a price that was guaranteed for at least 1 year. Suffice it to say, I was delighted by the potential savings!

So, I immediately contacted my CARFAX rep with an ultimatum – I demanded that CARFAX either price their services more competitively or consider my contract cancelled. The response I received was unconscionable - my CARFAX rep explained that the monthly price would NOT be lowered and if I chose to leave CARFAX, then my ability to compete effectively on Cars.com and AutoTrader.com would be severely impaired.

How is this possible?

Evidently, CARFAX pays AutoTrader.com and Cars.com a huge stipend to be the “sole” provider of vehicle history reports on these two marketplaces. Apparently, as part of this agreement, AutoTrader.com/Cars.com cannot display AutoCheck Reports(even if AutoCheck is the provider at the dealer’s store), but they can display CARFAX reports for CARFAX participating dealers. As my CARFAX rep explained, with the vast amount of competitor’s inventory  on AutoTrader.com/Cars.com, my decision to not show a vehicle history report (when my competitors are in fact showing these reports), would indicate to consumers that my dealership had “something to hide” and push customers away from my listings. I understand transparency and I knew she was right - I was livid.

It is my opinion, that CARFAX is using Cars.com/AutoTrader.com as means to extort dealers into paying higher fees for CARFAX’s services – all while Cars.com and AutoTrader.com receive a handsome tariff. Does this sound like an unfair, anti-competitive, or potentially illegal trade practice? I thought so.

This week, I spoke with Alex Vetter(VP of Cars.com) and Jeff Catron(Director of Dealer Strategy at AutoTrader.com). I explained to both executives, that is my opinion, that I’m currently being extorted by CARFAX. I explained that unless a fair resolution is offered, I intend to file a complaint with the FTC against all parties. They both listened to my feedback, and they said they’ll consider it closely, but they would not provide a definite decision. (Note: In my past experiences with Alex Vetter, he has always been fair and equitable in his dealings – I’m optimistic that Cars.com will protect the interests of the franchised dealer).

Why is this a big deal? Can’t you sell your inventory elsewhere?

Still today, I have a very favorable opinion of Cars.com, I receive plenty of business from the site each month. And while my opinion of AutoTrader.com is not favorable and regularly worsening(thanks to my opinion of their pre-IPO cash out), I can’t ignore that AutoTrader does in fact generate business for my dealership and still remains an online behemoth. At least as it applies to my dealership, leaving both of these sites would severely harm my effectivness in selling pre-owned cars.  Moreover, as I explained earlier, in today’s transparent and instant information environment, the used car shopper will ignore dealers that cannot quickly and easily provide history reports substantiating the condition of their vehicles - especially when other dealers do. And in fact, according to our CARFAX rep, from January 2012 to August 2012 my dealership has received 17,466 ICR’s  - or as she explained, the reports ran by consumers viewing inventory on AutoTrader.com and Cars.com. (Note:  I asked for a specific breakdown, and CARFAX has not supplied this data. In addition, for comparison purposes, I sold about 700 used vehicles during this same period).

The exact magnitude of this problem is far reaching. There are nearly 18,000 franchised dealers in the US that may be in a similar or even worse situation. I feel that dealers should not be forced to pay an unfair premium to CARFAX in order to market their vehicles and compete online. Moreover, Cars.com and AutoTrader.com should align their business model with the interests of their most valuable customers - the dealers. We paid the monthly fees that allowed Cars.com and AutoTrader.com to flourish – we should not be penalized as a result.

Disclaimers:
• Opinions AND VIEWS SET FORTH HEREIN  are my own AND DO NOT REPRESENTS FACTS.   SUCH OPINIONS AND VIEWS COULD BE WRONG. They do not represent the companies named or cited in this blog.
• I am not a lawyer. This information, especially legal advice, can be completely incorrect. No warranties are provided or expressed. Any reliance on such information is solely at your own risk.
• I am not privy to ANY details of the backend operations/analytics of any site mentioned in this blog
• This blog does not provide financial advice, and should not be interpreted as such.
• All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.

Comments

Jeremy, one alternative might be to "brand" your first image (thumbnail image) with an AutoCheck logo. This way on the Search Results Page consumers could see that you have this. If you used Dealer Specialties, we could do this for you, other providers can also likely do the same.

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy, you hit the nail on the head. I share your exact observations. They are definitely taking advantage of dealers. I refused to pay carfax what they wanted. If you file a complaint with the FTC, lets have the NADA and various state dealer associations know about this, to support a solution to this potentially unfair trade practice or anti-trust situation.

Oct 4, 2012

Autotrader and cars.com should know that Google Autos is in test mode with a handful of west coast dealers. Once it goes national things could and probably will change. We are considering dropping the lower performing site and giving Google Autos a try. Imagine what would happen if all dealers dropped cars.com or autotrader! Consumers would still buy cars, they just would go elsewhere to find them!

Oct 4, 2012

Another example of a corporate cult trying to impose its will on the marketplace. Got to love BMW's solid business decision.

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy understands the power of branding for his own purposes. He pays BMW a huge premium over an alternative auto maker so that he can leverage the investment BMW has made over the years in their brand. He pays Autotrader.com and Cars.com a huge premium over a lesser trafficked inventory site to leverage the investment they have made in their brands. I'm confused why he doesn't wish to apply the same logic to Carfax?

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy understands the power of branding for his own purposes. He pays BMW a huge premium over an alternative auto maker so that he can leverage the investment BMW has made over the years in their brand. He pays Autotrader.com and Cars.com a huge premium over a lesser trafficked inventory site to leverage the investment they have made in their brands. I'm confused why he doesn't wish to apply the same logic to Carfax?

Oct 4, 2012

Hey Philip,

Thanks for the comment and reading my post. First, in the interests of full disclosure, I'd like to clarify if this is the same Philip Moore that lists his occupation on LinkedIn as the Director of Strategic Insights at Carfax? Second, to answer your question, I absolutely understand the importance and complexity of branding, and I'll address your concern.

While many car shoppers may know CARFAX, I feel many more shoppers know that Experian is the company that supplies their personal credit report - the same company that is supplying the "credit score" necessary to finance the car they're researching â never mind the same score for other important life decisions (e.g. mortgage, loans, etc...) Second, from a high-line standpoint, it is my opinion that your CARFOX icon damages many premium brands - I certainly will not promote it at my dealership. Finally, one more point, I've seen many of your TV ads that, in my opinion, attempt to portray car dealers as untrustworthy and unscrupulous businesses - and therefore pushes consumers to trust CARFAX over the dealer. So, to answer your question, yes I understand branding and it's my opinion that CARFAX, as an overall brand, is not stronger than AutoCheck/Experian.

Thank you,
Jeremy

Oct 4, 2012

We tried carfax for 6 months and made no difference. So we are using autocheck and we have sold more cars than ever. I think that the idea of getting the autocheck logo in the first picture it's a great.

Oct 4, 2012

Here are 2 things that Carfax offers that I'm surprised don't get mentioned very often:

1. They provide a "Warranty Check" that lists all of the warranties that are on each vehicle.

2. They tell you if there are any opened recalls on the vehicle.

Is there an economical way to get this information without the Carfax? If you have to spend 20 minutes on the phone for each vehicle you don't know the exact warranties on, that could take a long time and there could always be issues with vehicles if you sell it to a customer and it has an opened recall on it.

Oct 4, 2012

I recommended the change from Carfax to AutoCheck at my previous dealer group and we currently use AutoCheck at our dealership. The issue has never been customer interest in a Carfax; when handed an AutoCheck report, customers are fine. The real issue is that because Carfax has an exclusive program with AutoTrader and Cars.com, our inventory has the "Get a Carfax Record Check" link instead of the snappy logo and "View the free Carfax report". As a result, and as the Carfax rep points out, online shoppers may think there's something to hide.

That AutoTrader and Cars.com have sold the exclusive right to extort money from dealers is true evil. That the best sales position Carfax can take is that they are the only choice is sad. My experience is that people that use both AutoCheck and Carfax actually prefer AutoCheck. For consumers, of course, that's not so much an option on AutoTrader or Cars.com.

Oct 4, 2012

Comments 1 - 10 of 39

You must be logged in to comment

Login Create an account

Add your comments:

   

Jeremy Alicandri's Recent Posts

Related Posts

  • Want the REAL Reasons Women Buy from their Salesperson?

    Welcome to Women’s Wednesday! Dealers who “get it” know that the key distinction in optimizing sales to women is having exceptional sales advisors who offer exceptional service. But what does that really look like? Women tell us directly through our car dealer review platform what works for them when interacting with a sales agent. Below are their top 5 reasons for buying a car from them: Trust 52.3% Being Respectful 52.1% Likeable 47.8% Knowledgeable 45.6% Understanding 40.6% These percentages add up to more than 100% because reviewers can submit multiple answers. NOTE: Coming in at 34% was the ‘price of the vehicle’. It is important, but ranks 6th overall. Clearly, connection and relationship are pivotal, outranking price. Trust: Women buy from those they trust. It’s essential to build trust – that rapport can take just a matter of minutes to create. The best way to build trust is to provide valuable and relevant information, quality guidance and advice. Be h...Read post

  • New Research: 1 in 6 Car Buyers Skips Test-Drive; Nearly Half Visit Just One (Or No) Dealership Prior to Purchase

    DMEautomotive study provides fresh evidence that dealership avoidance is a new car buying “normal” DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. – April 15, 2014 – It may be the second most expensive purchase of most people’s lives, but new research from DMEautomotive (DMEa) reveals that a growing number of Americans are bypassing test-drives – and making strikingly few visits to dealerships – in their car-buying process.   The latest survey of roughly 2,000 automotive consumers1 found that, before purchasing, 16% took no test-drive, and 33% test-drove only one car. And more than two-thirds (68%) reported that they visited only two dealerships or fewer before buying - with 40% visiting only one dealer.   The survey also measured consumer trust of dealer salespeople, and the results were sobering: only 21% claimed they perceive them as “trustworthy,” a lower trust rating than reported for lawyers, mortgage brokers and insurance salespeople.   “This avoidance of physical dealerships ...Read post

  • Gubagoo’s Fast-Growing Chat and ‘Total Engagement’ Solution for Dealer Websites Goes Mobile

    Dealerships can now track – and precisely target – the 40% of their site traffic that comes through smartphones and tablets; 1,100 dealers using Gubagoo report even higher chat-to-lead rates on mobile (74%) than on desktops   West Palm Beach, FL–April 15, 2014 – Gubagoo announced today that its behavioral analytics-based chat and website engagement platform for dealer websites is now fully optimized for mobile. This means that, for the first time, dealerships can track and then relevantly target – through chat and personalized offers and inventory display – every single visitor that hits their website via a smartphone or tablet.   With an estimated 30-40% of dealer site traffic now coming through mobile devices,[1] Gubagoo is the first solution to serve up the right chats, offers and inventory to on-the-go, mobile car shoppers. And it keeps them right on the dealership’s mobile site, unlike other solutions that force the consumer onto another page, breaking continu...Read post

  • What can you learn from Subaru of Wichita?

    “Look at the ways a dealership can be prepared for this situation at any given time. It’s that media readiness that really helped us move quickly, adapt and draw from who we are this was just an amplification of who we were to begin with,” Wirtz added. Read post

  • Fallon Chooses Ford amongst Controversy & Salespeople Humiliation

    Last month, I wrote an article on how Jimmy Fallon announced during “The Tonight Show” that he was in the market for a truck. Manufacturers immediately took to social media in attempts to convince the popular talk-show host that he should choose them, including Ford, Dodge, Chevrolet and Nissan. Fallon announced last week that he had chosen to purchase a 1015 Ford F-150 King Ranch. He then further announced that, while he had chosen the truck, he had not decided who he was going to buy it from. A cooperative effort between Ford and “The Tonight Show” conjured up a contest they named “Fingers on a 4x4,” in which 10 salespeople from around the country would participate for the opportunity to sell Mr. Fallon a truck, by putting their hands on a Ford F-150 located on the aircraft carrier U.S. S. Nimitz. The contest being that any salesperson would be eliminated from the competition if they removed their hands from the truck. The last person with their hand on the truck would ...Read post

  • DMEautomotive Receives Technology Leadership Award for Second Year in a Row

      DMEautomotive named as Dealer Marketing Magazine’s 2014 Technology Leader in Service Marketing for Driver Connect   Daytona Beach, Fla., April 9, 2014 -- DMEautomotive’s (DMEa), the leader in science-based, results-driven automotive marketing, has received the prestigious Dealer Marketing Magazine Technology Leadership Award for the second year in a row.    Recognized once again for best service marketing, DMEa won the award for Driver Connect, its groundbreaking mobile app. This is the fifth technology award DMEa has won in the past 12 months, four of which were for Driver Connect.   “We launched Driver Connect to the industry in 2012 because we knew that nothing was going to be more critical to dealership service and customer retention than engaging customers where they are increasingly spending their time, on their smartphones,” said Mike Walther, president and CEO of DMEautomotive. “Since then, Driver Connect has continued to evolve ahead of the mobile Read post

  • Why Your Website Privacy Policy Matters

    If you've been paying attention, you know that you need a privacy policy if you're collecting consumer information. The U.S. federal government requires that you describe what you're gathering and why, and how it will be used. Your website visitors also need to be able to find it easily, which means it needs to be linked on each page and featured prominently on any of your contact forms.Read post

  • Facebook Confirms Reduced Page Exposure Is Because Your Content Sucks

    It’s been widely reported by social media experts that organic reach for Facebook pages has plummeted in the past 6 months; from as high as 15%, to the current 1-2%.  As a public company, Facebook has a need to appease its shareholders by monetizing its platform as much as possible. Facebook knows that there is a fine line between delivering relevant content that users want to see, and paid ads. Many brands are obviously upset with these changes. One in particular has had enough. Last month, Eat24, a popular food site with 70,000 Facebook likes, wrote a public letter to Facebook. The letter accused Facebook of luring brands into using their platform, then slowly reducing these brand’s exposure to fans and making it a ‘pay-to-play’ model. Eat24 argued that their fans want to see their content. And that by withholding content, Facebook is forcing brands to pay for the additional reach. Eat24 then boldly said goodbye and stated that they would be shutting down their Facebook p...Read post