Community

Share your automotive expertise

2 Write a Blog Post

OPINION: CARFAX is extorting my dealership...

By Jeremy Alicandri on Dec 5, 2012

CARFAX provides stickers to place on our pre-owned vehicles. This is a shot of a sticker attached to a key cabinet in our office. We do not place these stickers on our cars, as we feel the image of the CARFOX is not consistent with BMW’s brand values.

Originally published on October 3, 2012.

 

 

Please click here for my most current CARFAX post.

Last month, after an extensive comparison of nearly 6,000 VINs, BMW of North America concluded that AutoCheck’s Vehicle History Reports were just as reliable as CARFAX reports. Finally, after years of only supporting CARFAX, BMW’s mandate for Dealers to use CarFax for Certified BMWs was over.  This meant, that as a BMW Dealer, I could now choose either CarFax or Experian’s Service (AutoCheck) as my vehicle history report provider.

So why would I want to change?

The answer is simple. Last month, I paid CARFAX $2,575.49 to provide unlimited Vehicle History Reports for my dealership. In comparison, as part of a discount agreement with BMW, AutoCheck offers their version of the same service for $1098/month – a savings of over 50% per month - and at a price that was guaranteed for at least 1 year. Suffice it to say, I was delighted by the potential savings!

So, I immediately contacted my CARFAX rep with an ultimatum – I demanded that CARFAX either price their services more competitively or consider my contract cancelled. The response I received was unconscionable - my CARFAX rep explained that the monthly price would NOT be lowered and if I chose to leave CARFAX, then my ability to compete effectively on Cars.com and AutoTrader.com would be severely impaired.

How is this possible?

Evidently, CARFAX pays AutoTrader.com and Cars.com a huge stipend to be the “sole” provider of vehicle history reports on these two marketplaces. Apparently, as part of this agreement, AutoTrader.com/Cars.com cannot display AutoCheck Reports(even if AutoCheck is the provider at the dealer’s store), but they can display CARFAX reports for CARFAX participating dealers. As my CARFAX rep explained, with the vast amount of competitor’s inventory  on AutoTrader.com/Cars.com, my decision to not show a vehicle history report (when my competitors are in fact showing these reports), would indicate to consumers that my dealership had “something to hide” and push customers away from my listings. I understand transparency and I knew she was right - I was livid.

It is my opinion, that CARFAX is using Cars.com/AutoTrader.com as means to extort dealers into paying higher fees for CARFAX’s services – all while Cars.com and AutoTrader.com receive a handsome tariff. Does this sound like an unfair, anti-competitive, or potentially illegal trade practice? I thought so.

This week, I spoke with Alex Vetter(VP of Cars.com) and Jeff Catron(Director of Dealer Strategy at AutoTrader.com). I explained to both executives, that is my opinion, that I’m currently being extorted by CARFAX. I explained that unless a fair resolution is offered, I intend to file a complaint with the FTC against all parties. They both listened to my feedback, and they said they’ll consider it closely, but they would not provide a definite decision. (Note: In my past experiences with Alex Vetter, he has always been fair and equitable in his dealings – I’m optimistic that Cars.com will protect the interests of the franchised dealer).

Why is this a big deal? Can’t you sell your inventory elsewhere?

Still today, I have a very favorable opinion of Cars.com, I receive plenty of business from the site each month. And while my opinion of AutoTrader.com is not favorable and regularly worsening(thanks to my opinion of their pre-IPO cash out), I can’t ignore that AutoTrader does in fact generate business for my dealership and still remains an online behemoth. At least as it applies to my dealership, leaving both of these sites would severely harm my effectivness in selling pre-owned cars.  Moreover, as I explained earlier, in today’s transparent and instant information environment, the used car shopper will ignore dealers that cannot quickly and easily provide history reports substantiating the condition of their vehicles - especially when other dealers do. And in fact, according to our CARFAX rep, from January 2012 to August 2012 my dealership has received 17,466 ICR’s  - or as she explained, the reports ran by consumers viewing inventory on AutoTrader.com and Cars.com. (Note:  I asked for a specific breakdown, and CARFAX has not supplied this data. In addition, for comparison purposes, I sold about 700 used vehicles during this same period).

The exact magnitude of this problem is far reaching. There are nearly 18,000 franchised dealers in the US that may be in a similar or even worse situation. I feel that dealers should not be forced to pay an unfair premium to CARFAX in order to market their vehicles and compete online. Moreover, Cars.com and AutoTrader.com should align their business model with the interests of their most valuable customers - the dealers. We paid the monthly fees that allowed Cars.com and AutoTrader.com to flourish – we should not be penalized as a result.

Disclaimers:
• Opinions AND VIEWS SET FORTH HEREIN  are my own AND DO NOT REPRESENTS FACTS.   SUCH OPINIONS AND VIEWS COULD BE WRONG. They do not represent the companies named or cited in this blog.
• I am not a lawyer. This information, especially legal advice, can be completely incorrect. No warranties are provided or expressed. Any reliance on such information is solely at your own risk.
• I am not privy to ANY details of the backend operations/analytics of any site mentioned in this blog
• This blog does not provide financial advice, and should not be interpreted as such.
• All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.

Comments

Jeremy, one alternative might be to "brand" your first image (thumbnail image) with an AutoCheck logo. This way on the Search Results Page consumers could see that you have this. If you used Dealer Specialties, we could do this for you, other providers can also likely do the same.

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy, you hit the nail on the head. I share your exact observations. They are definitely taking advantage of dealers. I refused to pay carfax what they wanted. If you file a complaint with the FTC, lets have the NADA and various state dealer associations know about this, to support a solution to this potentially unfair trade practice or anti-trust situation.

Oct 4, 2012

Autotrader and cars.com should know that Google Autos is in test mode with a handful of west coast dealers. Once it goes national things could and probably will change. We are considering dropping the lower performing site and giving Google Autos a try. Imagine what would happen if all dealers dropped cars.com or autotrader! Consumers would still buy cars, they just would go elsewhere to find them!

Oct 4, 2012

Another example of a corporate cult trying to impose its will on the marketplace. Got to love BMW's solid business decision.

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy understands the power of branding for his own purposes. He pays BMW a huge premium over an alternative auto maker so that he can leverage the investment BMW has made over the years in their brand. He pays Autotrader.com and Cars.com a huge premium over a lesser trafficked inventory site to leverage the investment they have made in their brands. I'm confused why he doesn't wish to apply the same logic to Carfax?

Oct 4, 2012

Jeremy understands the power of branding for his own purposes. He pays BMW a huge premium over an alternative auto maker so that he can leverage the investment BMW has made over the years in their brand. He pays Autotrader.com and Cars.com a huge premium over a lesser trafficked inventory site to leverage the investment they have made in their brands. I'm confused why he doesn't wish to apply the same logic to Carfax?

Oct 4, 2012

Hey Philip,

Thanks for the comment and reading my post. First, in the interests of full disclosure, I'd like to clarify if this is the same Philip Moore that lists his occupation on LinkedIn as the Director of Strategic Insights at Carfax? Second, to answer your question, I absolutely understand the importance and complexity of branding, and I'll address your concern.

While many car shoppers may know CARFAX, I feel many more shoppers know that Experian is the company that supplies their personal credit report - the same company that is supplying the "credit score" necessary to finance the car they're researching â never mind the same score for other important life decisions (e.g. mortgage, loans, etc...) Second, from a high-line standpoint, it is my opinion that your CARFOX icon damages many premium brands - I certainly will not promote it at my dealership. Finally, one more point, I've seen many of your TV ads that, in my opinion, attempt to portray car dealers as untrustworthy and unscrupulous businesses - and therefore pushes consumers to trust CARFAX over the dealer. So, to answer your question, yes I understand branding and it's my opinion that CARFAX, as an overall brand, is not stronger than AutoCheck/Experian.

Thank you,
Jeremy

Oct 4, 2012

We tried carfax for 6 months and made no difference. So we are using autocheck and we have sold more cars than ever. I think that the idea of getting the autocheck logo in the first picture it's a great.

Oct 4, 2012

Here are 2 things that Carfax offers that I'm surprised don't get mentioned very often:

1. They provide a "Warranty Check" that lists all of the warranties that are on each vehicle.

2. They tell you if there are any opened recalls on the vehicle.

Is there an economical way to get this information without the Carfax? If you have to spend 20 minutes on the phone for each vehicle you don't know the exact warranties on, that could take a long time and there could always be issues with vehicles if you sell it to a customer and it has an opened recall on it.

Oct 4, 2012

I recommended the change from Carfax to AutoCheck at my previous dealer group and we currently use AutoCheck at our dealership. The issue has never been customer interest in a Carfax; when handed an AutoCheck report, customers are fine. The real issue is that because Carfax has an exclusive program with AutoTrader and Cars.com, our inventory has the "Get a Carfax Record Check" link instead of the snappy logo and "View the free Carfax report". As a result, and as the Carfax rep points out, online shoppers may think there's something to hide.

That AutoTrader and Cars.com have sold the exclusive right to extort money from dealers is true evil. That the best sales position Carfax can take is that they are the only choice is sad. My experience is that people that use both AutoCheck and Carfax actually prefer AutoCheck. For consumers, of course, that's not so much an option on AutoTrader or Cars.com.

Oct 4, 2012

Comments 1 - 10 of 39

You must be logged in to comment

Login Create an account

Add your comments:

   

Jeremy Alicandri's Recent Posts

Related Posts

  • Mobile Apps Continue to Dominate the Mobile Web

    As a whole, the adoption of mobile devices continues at a staggering pace. The average consumer is now spending 18.9 hours per week on a mobile device. As apps have gained traction, brands have already established new priorities for how their mobile marketing strategy is structured. Mobile web, mobile paid search, mobile retargeting, paid app installs, mobile social marketing, and mobile messaging now function as gateways to an app install. More and more brands are utilizing these advertising channels to encourage an app install. This is not a minor advertising push. Brands are using strong tactics to promote app installs. The goal of these marketing efforts? Be present on the consumer’s mobile device. Being present on the smartphone now means apps. Read post

  • Automotive Management Training: Recycling Your Perspective

    No matter your experience or wisdom, recycle your thinking to the time you were a seedling. Stay green and let yourself grow!Read post

  • What Is Anticipatory Customer Service?

    A fascinating article in Forbes shared a concept that is increasingly winning over customers. In the article, the author described what he termed “anticipatory customer service” as “a customer experience that manages to serve even the unexpressed wishes and needs of your customers through the use of technology and automation.” People are busy. A gesture such as an emailed service reminder that a customer can view when they have time in their hectic schedule, is certainly appreciated by many. However, Anticipatory Customer Service takes this to another level. Depending on the circumstances and the customer preferences, not only would you e-mail the customer, you would also call them, send a text message and then a letter as well. This method works well for customers who want this communication. When a customer drops their car off for service, they want to be kept up-to-date on progress and completion.  If they’re in a meeting, they might prefer a text message. While if the...Read post

  • Apple’s Recent Announcement Of CarPlay Means Big Changes For Drivers

    Apple’s recent announcement of CarPlay which will integrate the iPhone, Apple maps and Siri into the car dashboard, is a move meant to compete directly with Google’s Open Automotive Alliance (OAA), and Microsoft’s Sync platform. This means big changes are in store for how shoppers driving, commuting and traveling by car will find and learn about your business. The fast moving map space plus local-search is attractive areas for innovation for software developers. One of the more interesting innovators taking advantage of the mobile trend is YILLIO which takes maps and local search to the next step by offering a patented ‘route-based’ search. Launched in January, users using YILLIO are able to search for businesses, information and value along their entire route, may it be 10 miles ahead or 150 miles ahead. See our article: Don’t Just Go…… YiLLiO! What’s cool for your biz is it aims to give users the right information; at the right time, by looking at signals such as...Read post

  • Dealer Service & Loyalty Boost Highlights Importance of Customer Experience

    The recently released J.D. Power 2014 U.S. Customer Service Index Study produced some interesting, and very promising, results. The report concluded that customer satisfaction with dealer service has increased across the board with overall CSI increasing from an average score of 846 to 855 in luxury brands, and from 789 to 797 in mass-market brands. The study noted some especially impactful trends when it came to customers that have complimentary or prepaid maintenance programs. In mass-market brands, where complimentary maintenance programs are less common, the study found that buyers of prepaid maintenance jumped from 15% to 46% over the past 5 years. The study shows that customers are gravitating towards the convenience of worry-free maintenance costs. According to Chris Sutton, senior director of the U.S. Automotive Retail Practice at J.D. Power, “Maintenance packages – whether they’re complimentary or paid for by the owners – create a long-term relationship between the ...Read post

  • Want the REAL Reasons Women Buy from their Salesperson?

    Welcome to Women’s Wednesday! Dealers who “get it” know that the key distinction in optimizing sales to women is having exceptional sales advisors who offer exceptional service. But what does that really look like? Women tell us directly through our car dealer review platform what works for them when interacting with a sales agent. Below are their top 5 reasons for buying a car from them: Trust 52.3% Being Respectful 52.1% Likeable 47.8% Knowledgeable 45.6% Understanding 40.6% These percentages add up to more than 100% because reviewers can submit multiple answers. NOTE: Coming in at 34% was the ‘price of the vehicle’. It is important, but ranks 6th overall. Clearly, connection and relationship are pivotal, outranking price. Trust: Women buy from those they trust. It’s essential to build trust – that rapport can take just a matter of minutes to create. The best way to build trust is to provide valuable and relevant information, quality guidance and advice. Be h...Read post

  • New Research: 1 in 6 Car Buyers Skips Test-Drive; Nearly Half Visit Just One (Or No) Dealership Prior to Purchase

    DMEautomotive study provides fresh evidence that dealership avoidance is a new car buying “normal” DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. – April 15, 2014 – It may be the second most expensive purchase of most people’s lives, but new research from DMEautomotive (DMEa) reveals that a growing number of Americans are bypassing test-drives – and making strikingly few visits to dealerships – in their car-buying process.   The latest survey of roughly 2,000 automotive consumers1 found that, before purchasing, 16% took no test-drive, and 33% test-drove only one car. And more than two-thirds (68%) reported that they visited only two dealerships or fewer before buying - with 40% visiting only one dealer.   The survey also measured consumer trust of dealer salespeople, and the results were sobering: only 21% claimed they perceive them as “trustworthy,” a lower trust rating than reported for lawyers, mortgage brokers and insurance salespeople.   “This avoidance of physical dealerships ...Read post

  • Gubagoo’s Fast-Growing Chat and ‘Total Engagement’ Solution for Dealer Websites Goes Mobile

    Dealerships can now track – and precisely target – the 40% of their site traffic that comes through smartphones and tablets; 1,100 dealers using Gubagoo report even higher chat-to-lead rates on mobile (74%) than on desktops   West Palm Beach, FL–April 15, 2014 – Gubagoo announced today that its behavioral analytics-based chat and website engagement platform for dealer websites is now fully optimized for mobile. This means that, for the first time, dealerships can track and then relevantly target – through chat and personalized offers and inventory display – every single visitor that hits their website via a smartphone or tablet.   With an estimated 30-40% of dealer site traffic now coming through mobile devices,[1] Gubagoo is the first solution to serve up the right chats, offers and inventory to on-the-go, mobile car shoppers. And it keeps them right on the dealership’s mobile site, unlike other solutions that force the consumer onto another page, breaking continu...Read post