Notifications & Messages

Jared Hamilton
From: Jared Hamilton
Hey - It’s time to join the thousands of other dealer professionals on DrivingSales. Create an account so you can get full access to the articles, discussions and people that are shaping the future of the automotive industry.
×
Jared Hamilton

Jared Hamilton Founder - CEO

Exclusive Blog Posts

How Servicing Fleets Should Be Different

How Servicing Fleets Should Be Different

A large local construction company truck pulls into the service drive. The lone occupant hops out of the driver’s seat, already scrolling through…

Are You Ready For Monday? DSES Best Idea Contest, 2019!

Are You Ready For Monday? DSES Best Idea Contest, 2019!

One of my favorite events at the Driving Sales Executive Summit is the Best Idea Contest. Each year participants enter their respective ideas. For those wh…

Who are Cybercriminals?

Who are Cybercriminals?

Remember the movie “War Games?” A teenager hacked into a computer and unwittingly almost started a nuclear war. In the late 60s, a famous phone…

Digital Finance SOS – Is Digital Retailing the Answer? (Part 2)

Digital Finance SOS – Is Digital Retailing the Answer? (Part 2)

Part Two: Why Aren’t Dealers Adopting Digital Retailing?   By now everyone knows about digital retailing. There are enough automotive tech…

Digital Retailing: 10% Technology, 90% Process

Digital Retailing: 10% Technology, 90% Process

Digital Retailing is a big deal in the automotive industry these days. The emergence of companies like Carvana, Vroom, and Tesla has rapidly changed custom…

Is it time for the industry to dump CSI?

I personally believe CSI is a waste of time.

We all know of dealers who bend the CSI rules in various ways... heck, i bet we could even debate right here what cheating on CSI actually is.  Everyone seems to have a different belief on what is acceptable in encouraging, requesting, or flat out incentivizing customers to give positive scores.  All it takes is one dealership to work the system and the data set is ruined.  Until scores are collected in a more uniform and verified manner, the information will remain tainted.

Unfortunately, dealers must “encourage” customers to submit positive surveys because there is simply too much pressure from OEMs who use CSI for ranking and rewarding stores that dealers cannot afford to let natural results come in.  Face it, CSI is not about measuring customer satisfaction, its about keeping in good political graces with your manufacturer.

Sure OEMs have written rules, outlined consequences and published memos about what is and isn’t acceptable in encouraging customers to return the surveys, but little if anything is done to police or verify the submissions.  Who wants to be the zone manager that enforces the rules only to see their zone numbers tank?  As long as there is false market pressure on “good CSI” and creating real customer loyalty is not the primary reward dealers will shortcut the system resulting in bad data and CSI will continue to be a waste of everyone's time.

The irony of CSI is that if the scores were actually indicative of success I guarantee that dealers would naturally monitor and improve them without encouragement.  The fact that OEMs need to incentivize dealers means there is not enough correlation between good CSI and a dealership’s success.  Either the system doesn’t work and there isn’t a correlation between good CSI and customer loyalty, or OEM involvement has screwed the whole thing up by placing false incentive in the wrong place.  Either way, the system needs to be corrected because its a big resource drain for the industry and those resources could be productively invested elsewhere.


CSI needs to have a greater impact on the market.
Im not convinced that today’s CSI scores, even if they were collected accurately, have enough impact on the market to merit a dealerships full attention.  Rather than start solving the CSI problem with correcting where we put incentives, what if we first put more weight in the market behind the scores by making them public?

If CSI data were accurate, and it could be if the survey collection process changed, OEMs could publish CSI in real time like an online reviews. Yesterday’s CSI is designed to just measure what customers are thinking, but today’s systems in the social web do that so much better and include the added bonus of swaying customers decisions.  Today’s CSI scores should be an aggregate of a variety of verified online review sources.

If we want CSI to matter more, let the market see it.  The correlation between good scores and customer loyalty will strengthen and provide natural incentive for customer satisfaction to increase.  Furthermore, tracking customer sentiment on the web, through a variety of social applications could be a much better indicator of CSI than the narrow view a survey provides.  Our current CSI survey system is so out dated its like trying to use morris code to communicate with an iphone user.  CSI systems need to get with the times. The transparency and effectiveness of the social web is powerful.  Our industry needs to embrace it, after all it has already rendered our current CSI system obsolete.

Move the incentive to the right place.
Once we have tapped into the power of the social web, aggregated a reputation score from a variety of verified sources, and shared internal scores with the market so the scores actually meant something, we would need to completely remove the old incentive structure and focus where our attention should be.

I believe OEMs should remove all incentives and payouts that dealerships earn through good CSI and pay it to dealers who create customer loyalty.  Rather than compare dealerships based on CSI survey results, they should compare dealerships on their ability to retain customers over the years. If the theory is that good customer satisfaction creates customer loyalty, and OEMs want to help dealers create and correlate the loyalty why don’t they put extra dealer cash or another incentive for repeat customers of a dealership? I think this could be more effective because it would force the dealers to EARN loyalty through customer relations.  Unlike a CSI score, you cant really cheat creating repeat business and if you could, bravo, what is the worst that happens? You sell more cars?  We have confused the end with the means and need to refocus on what we really want to accomplish. CSI means nothing if it doesn’t create loyalty.

Making CSI a contest between dealers, and adding big rewards to those dealers who score the best in CSI creates a false goal that is achieved through gaming the system.  If the refocused on selling repeat business, it would solve a lot of problems and remind us why we really track CSI to begin with.

How would you make CSI better?
When it comes to CSI we are like a dog chasing its tail thinking we are actually hunting something worth while.  Like I said earlier, I believe our current CSI system is a waste of time. The best thing manufacturers could do with their CSI surveys is throw them out and start over focusing on the social web then incentivize dealers to create loyalty, not game survey results.  

Im surprised that as an industry we are not more vocal about the lame CSI system that is in place.  Do you feel it benefit's you or is it just a political game that wastes your time?  How would you make CSI better or do you not mind the political tail chasing?

 

 

 

Philip Zelinger
Is it time for the industry to dump CSI? NO -- why throw the baby out with the bath water? CSI isn't dead, or even broken -- it simply needs a tune up! Technology often leads to innovations in processes for the auto industry and need has always been the catalyst for both new technologies and the innovations that are dependent on them. OEM's needed to incentivize their dealers to prioritize the long term needs of their shared customers over the dealers short term profits; for obvious reasons. The solution of yesterday was limited by the technology that allowed the OEMs to manage and monitor the process of satisfying customers in a quantifiable and verifiable manner. Money motivates so the OEMs resorted to the quick fix of writing a check to the dealers -- either directly or in the form of push/pull incentives based on meeting certain CSI benchmarks. Similarly, old school car guys/gals passed on the cash in the form of gas vouchers, free oil changes and yes they even often split the money in some form of kick back for a good report! Subsequent attempts to fix the processes hit the brick wall of human nature which will always seek the path of least resistence and posts like this one were born. Then the Internet opened up the Wolrd Wide Web for customers to honestly express their opinions of their vehicle, their dealer and their shopping/buying experience outside of the confines of the CSI questionnaires. Unfortunately, as is often the case, the auto industry was slightly behind the times. They failed to integrate this new technology and the related innovations in processes that now follow customers onto the Internet Super Highway -- taking theri opinions with them on the trip. Social networking sites that allow like minded consumers to share their experiences before, during and after their shopping/buying/ownership cycles took off like a rocket; again, for obvious reasons linked to human nature and our herd mentality. Google and the search engines quickly realized that their goal of maximizing relevancy in their search results for their customers required them to shift their algorithms to follow their customer's opinions vs. S.E.O. manipulations by tech saavy dealers who try to improve their rankings with cleverly crafted meta tags, search words and content. Now comes the good news! The auto industry may not always be the first to embrace new technology but when they do they do it with a vengance. The opportunity for dealers to improve their reputation -- substitute C.S.I. -- online through social networks and various dealer rating sites as well as in the real world that is increasingly linked to the virtual one is already being applied. The solution for the OEMs to improve their C.S.I. programs resides on the same exit of the Internet Super Highway! All the OEMs need to do is to place their CSI questionnaires and the results onto their own social networking site directly linked to FaceBook, MySpace, Twitter, etc.. The dealer's SEO would be enhanced - or not -- by this simple shift from the real world to the virtual one. Frankly the complaints will provide more value than the compliments if they are properly addressed and resolved in the light of day since they will allow the dealers -- and their respective OEMs -- to find and fix the problems before they find their way onto the same social networking sites but in a much less controllable environment. Make and keep your customers as friends on an OEM sponsored CSI social networkig site and put the new Google algorithms to work for you vs. against you. After all, what are friends -- and CSI -- for!
Scott Reid
Social media monitoring also can be manipulated the best way is owner retention period,One flaw in retention for a metro store is buyers come from all over the city and may pass two,three or four stores to get to a dealer they want to do business with but ill never service there? there is no simple solution when money is involved.
Michal Lusk
Very thought-provoking article. I agree that the best measure of real overall customer satisfaction is found on the internet—DealerRater, Google Place pages, Edmunds.com, even Cars.com now. We encourage customers to do both the private OEM surveys for sales and service and public online reviews. We incentivize customers by telling them that their opinion helps other consumers and that we appreciate their feedback. We have had great success building a positive online reputation, just by asking. We incentivize our sales staff by demonstrating to them the value of online reviews that mention them by name, and especially their DealerRater review page. Our savvy sales consultants use their DealerRater URL and reviews to help sell themselves and close customers. One of my favorite things about public online reviews vs. private OEM surveys is that we actually have a public forum for attempting to recover dissatisfied customers. With surveys, once a negative score posts it drops our score and there is no mechanism for correcting it, even if we go back and make things right with the customer. With online reviews, local consumers get to see that we do care and have at least made an attempt to make things right. And we do have consumers change their minds and rewrite their reviews after their issues have been corrected. Let’s face it, car dealers are frequently perceived negatively. Most consumers have had a bad experience at a dealership at one time or another. Many of our customers tell me they would rather go to the dentist. Anything that publically helps overcome that perception is a good thing!
Daniel Boismier
Maybe the OEM should start putting their CSI reviews online and let Google index it with their ratings. Problem solved.
Bryan Armstrong
Daniel, I like it!

 Unlock all of the community & features  Join Now