We all know that just having a website, no matter how great, is not enough to make sales in the automotive industry. LEARN MORE
There is a lot of confusion in the automotive industry about the importance of factors like “culture” and “employee engagement.” Isn’t this the soft stuff we don’t need to worry about?
Not according to Deloitte’s latest “Human Capital Trends” report, which concluded;
“This year, employee engagement and culture issues exploded onto the scene, rising to become the No. 1 challenge around the world in our study.
Really? If culture and engagement are truly “No. 1,” maybe we should get serious and devote some noodle time to figuring out what they mean in the context of a dealership. Both terms are so general and vague that we’d have a hard time defining them. For example, if we asked 100 people on the street to define “culture” and we’d likely get 100 different, and humorous, answers.
Here are some of the things we might hear. “Culture is what happens inside people-friendly companies like Disney where employees are part of the “cast.” Or, “Culture is a Silicon Valley tech giant where programmers lounge in hammocks surrounded by beanbag chairs and candy dispenser.” Answers like these, I’m afraid, miss the mark entirely.
I’ve been exploring the concept of “culture” for 38 years, and in 2009 I wrote-up my findings in a book titled “Primal Management: Unraveling the Secrets of Human Nature to Drive High Performance.” I wanted to call it “Managing the Tribe,” but the publisher, the American Management Association, said, “The word 'tribe' doesn’t resonate with a corporate audience.” Curiously, the top business book of 2009 was titled, “Tribes.”
It is much easier to understand “culture” if we go back to the basics. Way back! We don’t think of this often, or ever, but not so long ago human beings lived in small, intimate bands, struggling to survive by hunting and gathering in a harsh ice-age wilderness. The total population of the planet at that time was around 1 million as opposed to 7.3 billion today.
“Culture,” in the ice-age context, was straightforward and much easier to think about. “Culture” equated to the tribe’s database of hard-won survival knowledge acquired from centuries of near-death experiences and trial and error experimentation.
Because of this tribal heritage, our brains are still wired to reward us with powerful feelings of high self esteem when we master the survival skills of our tribe, and punish us with painfully low self esteem, when we let the tribe down. The brain’s culture mechanism, in other words, has sharp emotional “teeth” to make sure we pay attention. Maybe this is why half of us will suffer from a mental illness during our lifetimes, because the brain thinks we are ignoring our tribe’s survival priorities.
This “tribal” definition of culture is hard, not soft, because the culture system protects our survival. It also helps explain the saying, “Culture eats strategy for lunch.” A tribe that masters a common survival technology, and deploys it expertly and in a united fashion, can achieve amazing things, like bringing down a Wooly Mammoth. But a strategy without a motivated tribe to execute it is worthless.
Most modern workplaces, I would argue, don’t qualify as tribes because the people inside don’t really care about one another. In a real tribe, tribe mates will literally take an arrow for one another. Sort of like the Marine Corps motto: “No man left behind.” Modern corporations don’t qualify as intensely-bonded tribes and hence they don’t really have true cultures. What we call “culture” is often just rules dictated by the boss: “Do this or else.” A true culture is based on the group consensus and defines what the tribe deeply believes in and strives for.
In the modern context “employee engagement” is the term we use to describe tribal behavior and tribal connections. An engaged employee is like a tribal ally who commits to his/her workmates and will go beyond to call of duty to impress and protect them.
Unfortunately, most dealerships are not populated with allies, but with impersonal “trading partners.” The motto for a trading partner is, “If you give me money, I will trade you a certain amount of work, but not one bit more.” In a trading-partner world, “I don’t care about you, and you don’t care about me, so if you disappeared tomorrow, I wouldn’t care.” Gallup calls these people, “disengaged.” In the average US company, 51% of employees fall into this category.
On a sales floor flooded with salespeople, the situation is often worse. Here we often find warring tribes who compete aggressively for customers; almost like gladiatorial combat. The hapless customer often gets caught in the middle of the melee and ends up disliking the experience. Gallup has a term for these folks, “actively disengaged.” These are people who dislike their work experience so much they actually want to harm the business and sabotage their co-workers. You can think of them as the enemy within. Here is a disturbing fact, in a typical company, 17% of employees qualify as “actively disengaged.”
Now we can see why consulting firms like Gallup, Deloitte, Kenexa and many others make such a big deal out of culture and engagement, because companies that manage pull it off, and truly connect with their people, excel. Engagement, for example, has been linked to an ever-increasing list of business benefits, like:
Engaged workplaces are simply better at tapping into committment, energy and passion of the workforce. By the way, I call the tribal approach “natural management” because it works with the grain of human nature, not against it.
For retail automotive, creating tribal connections and an authentic culture might make the difference between lagging your competitors and "slaying" them in the marketplace. An engaged tribe will master and deploy the latest technologies more quickly, and adapt to ever-changing customer expectations and market conditions more efficiently. Culture and engagement create a powerful competitive advantage because employees have your back.
Since companies are so bad at building “tribal connections” and engaging employees, there ought to be a huge upside for companies that get it right.
This is exactly what I have found. The business benefits that accrue when people truly commit to the organization, and to each other, have been astonishing. For example, I helped the largest designer and builder of hospitals and clinics in the US double revenue and triple profits over a 4-year period. I also helped VCST, an automobile parts manufacturer in Mexico, cut employee turnover from 65% to 15% over a 14-month period. As a bonus, productivity increased 125%!
In summary, I think every company should become a united tribe because everyone comes out ahead. Employees win because coming to work, no longer seems like “work.” Mangers win because everybody gets their jobs done faster, better, and smarter and with a good attitude. Customers win because they get better goods and services delivered with a smile, and shareholders win because they make much more money.
I think managers and executives intuitively want to treat employees respectfully and I simply give them permission to do so. I tell them, “It’s okay to bring your humanity to work, and it’s okay to take a personal, mentoring approach with your people.” This should make common sense. After all, if you want your people to knock down walls for you, you had better be prepared do the same for them!
Transitioning to a “natural management” approach is easier than you might think. Give it a try and then watch how hard your people will work to impress both you, their trusted mentor, and their tribe mates!
What are your thoughts on culture and employee engagement? Is your dealership full of allies, trading partners, or warring tribes? Could it benefit from this organic, natural-approach to management?