There are several automotive industry technology suppliers offering various automotive sales Internet Lead Scoring solutions for deployment and implementation in a variety of ways at Tiers 1, 2 and 3. They are:
After having had lengthy discussions with each of the above, and participating in numerous presentations, then speaking with dealers, enterprises and car companies who have implemented some form of using Lead Scoring, I am convinced more than ever that Lead SCORING is a strategy with several major flaws.
Do customers lie in their lead forms? Of course, but that is not the worst problem...
Are some leads distributed to more than one dealer, diluting each dealer's probability of selling that customer a vehicle, regardless of any arbitrary score a software system assigns? Of course they are...
If I send 10 leads to any dealership in America that have been automatically assessed by a software system and then assigned a rating number that indicates which lead is most likely to result in a sale...
How will each dealership assign resources?
How will each ISM allocate the most valuable resource a salesperson has, their time and effort?
Lead scoring is now, and will forever be prone to the self-fulfilling prophecy effect... I think I can, so I will and then do... I think I can't, so I won't and I don't.
The fact is that Lead Scoring has existed ever since 1995 when the first dealerships to receive 3rd party Internet leads went active with AutoByTel... When any ISM receives 150 leads in one month, he or she will decide by looking at the lead details which leads they will allocate their time and greatest efforts to, and which ones are probably a waste of time... Lead SCORING is nothing more than scientifically based CHERRY PICKING! Now, if you have accepted all the reductions in total sales that Cherry Picking implies, and you are going to Cherry Pick regardless of the net reduced sales that result, then putting some logic into the decision making process as to which leads will get time and attention required to sell a car is probably better than most ISM's gut instincts... But why would anyone want to?
In 1999 I watched Tom Vann, the owner of Team Hillsdale Dodge in MI use his own Lead Scoring system... Only it helped sell more cars because he did not "score" the lead as much as he "categorized" it and then assigned a specific Salesperson based on which ISM would be the best match for that lead. In other words, Tom used what others would mistakenly re-invent as a Lead Scoring system 6 years later to, instead, raise the likelihood of each lead becoming an appointment and then a sale by prescribing a certain level of customization in how each lead would be handled by assessing the lead based on the characteristics that could be determined by the limited data within each lead. By assigning specific ISM's to each lead based on assessing each lead, Tom knew which people would handle any lead assigned to them in a specific manner reflecting their individual differences. Therein lies the best and most productive use of the technology created to generate Lead SCORING...
Take out the Scoring bullshit and insert logic that predicts and prescribes what manner a lead should be handled in to maximize the probability of selling a vehicle to that customer... Lead SCORING should die... RIGHT NOW... It is a Frankenstein monster that should never have seen the light of day...
Lead SEGMENTATION that places each lead into a category that corresponds with the type of lead response and handling most likely to create a sales opportunity, either this week, next week, next month, or next year is what our industry needs... NOT a glorified Cherry Picker!!!!
Here is what Lead SCORING looks like:
Here is what Lead SEGMENTATION looks like:
Of course, how each dealer implements their use of Lead Scoring will vary and so will either the positive or negative impact. The point I am trying to make in this article about Lead Scoring and the dangers it presents in the most common current iterations is that Lead Scoring systems need to be modifiied. Their programming technology must be changed so that rather than a score, a predictive case scenario model is developed that places each lead into a category or segment that correlates to predefined variations on lead management processes.
These variations in lead response attributes would include such dealership driven tasks as phone and email follow-up and how or who the lead is routed to... Some leads go to an ISS, others go to special finance, some are sent to a BDC (inhouse or outsourced), others are sent to the used car department because despite coming in as a new vehicle lead the system tells us we have an 80%+ probability that this prospect will buy a used vehicle, if they buy anything. There would be at least 5 and maybe a dozen or more lead management and response attributes that are assigned to each lead by the system based on maximizing and optimizing the outcome.
In other words, don't put a number on the lead, tell us what the best way to handle it REALLY is!!!