Notifications & Messages

Jared Hamilton
From: Jared Hamilton
Hey - It’s time to join the thousands of other dealer professionals on DrivingSales. Create an account so you can get full access to the articles, discussions and people that are shaping the future of the automotive industry.
×
Todd Katcher

Todd Katcher Managing Partner

Exclusive Blog Posts

2017 Presidents Club Insights - Patrick McMullen

2017 Presidents Club Insights - Patrick McMullen

Listen to what Patrick McMullen from MAXDigital has to say about the future of automotive, what dealers can do today to prepare, and how DrivingSales Presi…

Five Tips for Selling Used or Certified Pre-Owned Vehicles

Five Tips for Selling Used or Certified Pre-Owned Vehicles

Selling used or certified pre-owned vehicles can be daunting task. With prices, laws, and competition varying across the country selling a pre-owned car fo…

What Motivates Your Employees to Perform?

What Motivates Your Employees to Perform?

Sorting through resumes, you find applicants who show potential. There are some with experience to walk on the job and set your service department abla…

How to Recruit the Best Talent for Your Dealership

How to Recruit the Best Talent for Your Dealership

Employee turnover can cost a dealership approximately $400,000 per year through lost sales, service offerings, new hire search, and training expenses even …

2017 Presidents Club Insights - Mark Brown

2017 Presidents Club Insights - Mark Brown

Hear from Mark Brown, sales director at Grappone Auto, about what he thinks is coming for the auto industry, how dealers can prepare, and how the DrivingSa…

GM is being Naive

GM recently pulled its $12M advertising campaign from Facebook because it was not effective.
LINK

My question -- effective at what?

Let's give the multi-billion dollar company (GM, not Facebook) the benefit of the doubt and say that they may be pulling back the reigns in order to reassess the situation and goals of their campaigns, despite public reports to the contrary.

And then let's look at the reason why they were misinformed to begin with. Branding vs. Advertising and their respective goals.

My definitions - (may not be textbook)

Branding - this involves "getting your name out there" so when you are in the mind of the consumer when they make a purchase. Examples of this are billboards, events, charity and FACEBOOK.

Advertising - this involves the actual end result of a purchase that is attached to a particular effort

Branding takes a long time to build-up and a short time to fall. That's why it's easier for an existing brand to launch a new product and a new brand, even with a better product has a steeper climb to the same point.

Each level of branding has a different impact and results should be measured differently as well.

A recent discussion about a business that was paying over $5000/month for billboards and swore by that business model, took down the billboards for a test -- and their sales did not drop. The following month, they put that money towards direct advertising and saw an increase in sales -- actual ROI.

Over time, the assumption is that the branding from the billboards does impact business, especially in a crowded market with a lot of advertisers. But the goals should be different. ROI should not be counted when it comes to branding.

Advertising on the other hand has a direct impact on sales. Send out x number of emails, postcards, etc. and expect a certain response and a certain dollar return. It's tangible, quantitative and often times repeatable.

Advertising has a cause and effect that is on a much shorter time-frame. Send out a coupon, people use it within 45 days or never will.

So where did GM go wrong (assuming they did)?

They wanted to Facebook advertising to lead to car sales. For a brand as big as GM, the goal should have been BRANDING of their models, features, pricing, etc. and leaving it up to the local dealers to spend their money and determine their tangible ROI which would be much higher based on hyper-local advertising and call to actions that Facebook advertising could create.

While the $12M advertising spend is a minimal amount to GM, the negative impact on Facebook leading up to their IPO has been large with people raising lots of questions about their long-term prospects as an advertising medium. But that's another story. (LINK)

When considering your overall marketing, a certain amount of money must be spent in both Branding and Advertising -- and your goals must be relative to the expectations and definitions of each.

Got questions? Ask away... it's not all about ROI.

UPDATE: GM says that it spends $30M on Marketing and $10M on Advertising on Facebook. It is pulling the $10M but says it is re-evaluating and believes in social marketing.

 

Todd Katcher
Digital Dealership System
todd@ddsmail.co

c: 615.669.5244
twitter: @digitaldealers
web: www.digitaldealershipsystem.com
blog: www.fouronthefloorblog.com

 Unlock all of the community & features  Join Now