Notifications & Messages

Jared Hamilton
From: Jared Hamilton
Hey - It’s time to join the thousands of other dealer professionals on DrivingSales. Create an account so you can get full access to the articles, discussions and people that are shaping the future of the automotive industry.
×
Travis Wise

Travis Wise Sales Manager

Exclusive Blog Posts

VOI vs ROI

VOI vs ROI

We all seek growth, personally and professionally. What I’ve come to understand is that growth in a business isn’t measured by ROI alone. …

Develop Your Next-Gen Leadership from Service Employees

Develop Your Next-Gen Leadership from Service Employees

Service employees work hard, really hard. The service department is a baptism-by-fire style of teaching, especially in busy domestic dealers where there is…

4 Benefits of Omnichannel Marketing

4 Benefits of Omnichannel Marketing

Marketing is becoming increasingly complex, with the proliferation of ‘Big Data,” predictive analytics and new mobile and digital channels. To …

Digital Finance SOS – Is Digital Retailing the Answer? (Part 4)

Digital Finance SOS – Is Digital Retailing the Answer? (Part 4)

Part Four: Summary - Digital Retailing, Done Right, is the Answer! The automotive reality in today’s era of ecommerce is that Digital Retailing ha…

Why New Doesn't Always Mean Better for Auto Industry Marketers

Why New Doesn't Always Mean Better for Auto Industry Marketers

Global advertising spend is expected to exceed half a trillion dollars for the fourth year in a row, and American brands are once again fueling t…

I've been meaning to comment on this Ward's Article (regarding a seemingly systemic disregard for inventory aging concerns) for a while now, but I just haven't made it a priority. Now, with almost three months of reflection on my original reaction I wonder if that is the underlying dilemma for the dealer community - inventory aging just isn't a priority?

Of course, I have no hard cash or debt risk on the line with the timing of this post - so how could one of the most talked about metrics in the pre-owned vehicle marketplace avoid being a top priority? Or is age misunderstood, or is there some other reason that I'm unable to grasp?

I've spent the last 20 minutes Googling the topic and have found surprisingly little. I've spent the last 3 years discussing it with hundreds of dealer principles and UCMs, and while I've seen very little change in attitude during that time period, I have heard some interesting feedback. I'm very curious to read this community's comments on the topic, but I'll share the most common one I receive from managers.

When discussing an aging strategy with a manager (admittedly as it relates to our product) I usually hear some form of "that doesn't affect me because I write down my stuff" or "I adjust my cost basis across all my units so we're good". Now, I understand this principle just fine, in fact I've had to employ it handily to my stock portfolio the past few months, but isn't it missing the issue? According to Ward's research it isn't the depreciation we are really driving at (though no basis adjusting is going to fix a stock that is ultimately bound for zero), but instead it's the actual probability of retailing that specific unit irrespective of what other units you have cost packaged it with. BTW - is it just me, or isn't that the way CDOs started?

So the question I pose to the community is this, "Is it a failure of differentiating depreciation risk from probability of sale that keeps a unit on a lot for 100+ days, or is it just a gambler's mentality?"

-- Travis Howard, VP, Dealerslink, Inc.

 Unlock all of the community & features  Join Now