DrivingSales
6 Things You Need to Know About Marketing in a Mobile First World
The world has shifted. It is time to stop thinking about mobile AND desktop, and put all the focus on mobile.
The old way of thinking was that desktops were the platform for people to do their research and mobile was where they got their directions. That is no longer the situation. Most of your customers are bypassing the desktop completely and interacting entirely with your site on a mobile device.
Perhaps you are thinking: Well our site is responsive so we're fine. Being "responsive" usually means that what is built for your desktop version rearranges for people when they get to your site using a mobile device. Let's be clear... that is not enough. In a mobile-first world it's going to take more than a "responsive" website to be a successful strategy.
It was my privilege April 9 to moderate a pivotal workshop at the DrivingSales Presidents Club event. The topic was Marketing in a Mobile First World with our two presenters Carlos McEwan from Jazel and Eric Brown from LotLinx. There was too much discussion in the room to give you a full tutorial, but here are the top 6 things you need to know:
- Mobile is King
At DrivingSales we collect trends in website traffic from thousands of dealers across the country. Last month 57% of traffic to dealer sites was on a mobile device. The surprising thing about that number is that it is grew at a 10% rate over last year. When you look at your website you need to do it on your phone, or tablet.... not on your computer. - User First
It is tempting to build the website for ourselves. We want to focus on things that are important to us: our beautiful building, our leadership team, fancy technology. News flash, your customer doesn't care about what you care about. Building for the consumer experience first means eliminating everything that gets in the way of what your customer wants to do. This lesson is even more vital on mobile where you only have a small screen to present. One dealer in the room talked about how he removed their chat pop-ups to decrease distractions on their mobile site. The result? They see people spending more time on their site. - Think of Your Site as a Live Interaction
This approach came from Carlos and I feel it is a great way to think through your site strategy. His suggestion is to think about your site as a customer lot visit. Would you attack your customer as soon as they got on the lot to get their phone, email, address, phone number? Would you interrupt them shopping your lot with a service offer? Thinking this way helps you understand how your site should flow, and help eliminate distractions. - You Won't be There to Hold Your Customers' Hand
During the end of the session we had an exercise where dealers sitting next to each other had to exchange their website address with the person next to them. They then had to perform 7 common customer tasks on their mobile sites. It was interesting to see how many people had to ask questions or give directions to each other to perform these basic tasks. The problem is that you can't be there to show your customers how to request information. If someone sitting right next to you can't find the click to call button, neither can your customers. - It's Time to Rethink Your Goals
If you are just measuring your site's performance based on lead generation, you could be vastly disappointed. From one dealer case study we found that the likelihood of a customer filling in a form from the phone decreased by 61%. Simply put, people on mobile devices don't want to fill out forms. - What Happens When There's No Web Searches?
Eric provided a glimpse into the future when artificial intelligence integrates itself into our buying processes. Think of the amount of data you are sending back to Google, Apple and Amazon about your preferences, frequented locations, sites visited, purchases and habits.
The arms race is on to turn that data into artificial intelligence that will insert itself into our buying processes. Suddenly we'll start getting notifications that inform us that our car has reached maximum trade-in ROI, and that there are 3 cars within a 10 mile radius that would fit our style.
This new approach of artificial intelligence decision making may be only a few years away and the technology is most likely going to outpace the human acceptance of it. However, we are starting to see these automated, decision making applications sneak into our lives. Think of how your phone looks at your calendar, finds events with locations in them and then warns you when you need to leave to get there on time. You probably didn't even notice, but your phone is already taking away decision making. You didn't have to search it, it happened automatically and that is coming from every decision you make. This brave new world may not even need websites.
So, how will we compete when artificial intelligence steps in? It will be based on the speed of information you produce and your experience, ranked by your past customers. In this scenario it is crucial to get your cars on your site as soon as possible and reputation management will be where you sink or swim.
I wish I could capture all of the conversations that happened during the workshop in New York, but I guess that's why you need to be there. The one clear message though was mobile is king and it certainly isn't going away.
One of the comments I made during the session was that I have 5 kids (yes, I'm from Utah) all of them from the 11 year old to the 1 year old know how to operate my phone, but none of them really know how to use it as a PHONE.
Every time I call them I have to explain how to put the receiver near their face and the transmitter to their ear. What happens when that generation starts buying cars? They see devices as an integral part of life and they have a hard time understanding why they're called phones.
We may have a hard time accepting what's next in artificial intelligence decision making, but the next generation won't and we need to prepare.
DrivingSales
Are Pay Plans the Best Motivator?
If there is one hot topic in your dealership, it’s pay plans. It is the ultimate water cooler discussion, and the most leveraged tool for managers to motivate performance.
But, it seems like you can’t look on the internet without reading about how job searchers are changing what they want from an employer. And with a larger number of millennials entering the workforce, it probably warrants a view into what drives this generation of workers. Studies suggest they prefer recognition over money, they feel entitled to receive more benefits and perks from their jobs, the list goes on and on. So does that mean that pay plans are losing their luster overall?
We wanted to find out, so we asked this question: do salespeople entering the industry care about pay plans, or instead place more value on other factors (like customer service or career path)?
We surveyed nearly 500 salespeople to see exactly what motivated them to perform at their dealership.
Pay Plans - do they work?
First off let me start by saying I’m not going to blow smoke; pay plans are still the clear cut winner of what motivates salespeople. When asked what motivates them at work, 45% said that compensation was number one.
So that answers the question, right? Time to double down on building the right pay plan. Well…
NADA reported in December 2016 that salesperson turnover was 67%. This is the case in in spite of the fact that financial compensation for dealers grew at 1.4% in the face of only a .4% growth in profitability. That means that compensation grew 250% faster than profit, and it still didn’t really improve turnover.
Obviously the tried and true philosophy is that your pay plan shouldn’t really outpace profitability, but in an attempt to keep good salespeople it seems profitability was sacrificed. There has to be a better way to keep people than continually throwing more money at them.
Other Motivations
It is true that pay plans are the number one motivator, but that’s not the only thing that motivates salespeople. It may surprise some people, but according to the responses we received, 21% of salespeople were motivated by developing skills, 15% were motivated by a career path and an additional 15% were motivated by delivering good customer service.
This hints at the fact that there may be more to motivating a sales team than just adjusting (again and again) your pay plan. These other motivating factors imply that pay plans are not the end-all-be-all motivator. In fact, it can even by an indication that you could have the wrong hire.
In It For The Long Haul
We also asked all of the salespeople how long they planned to be in the automotive dealership. With all the turnover in the sales department we figured there had to be a large portion of vagrant salespeople who were in it for the short-term payoff. The truth from our findings: 60% of salespeople who had worked in the dealership for less than a year, planned on being there for over 5 years.
Only 5% of the salespeople coming into the dealership for the first time planned on being there for less than a year. 63% of people who planned to leave within the first year said their primary motivation was compensation. Even though 95% of people planned on staying, a year later only 33% of them were still there, with 40% of those leaving in the first 90 days according to NADA.
When we compared how long salespeople wanted to stay in the dealership, to their motivations at work, an interesting break happened. Salespeople who planned on leaving within a year were 40% more likely to be motivated primarily by compensation.
Salespeople who planned on staying were more likely to be motivated by something other than the pay plan. Don’t get me wrong, pay plans were still number one at 32% (down 10% from the average), but this group was 23% more likely to be motivated by developing skills and an impressive 73% more likely to be motivated by career paths.
Here’s the good news, not only did these individuals want to stay at the dealership, but they also closed more deals. Salespeople who planned on staying longer reported outselling their peers by 9% on average.
Looking Past the Pay Plan
Pay plans are still king when it comes to motivation, but only when the other factors are addressed. Ignoring other aspects of employee motivation could turn into a detriment to your dealership. You can download our full study here to see other factors that impact motivation.
All salespeople are not created equal. Those who want to stay are looking for you to invest in them beyond a monthly check, they want to know there is a path for developing skills and a their career.
6 Comments
Automotive Copywriter
I was a salesperson for about 18 months. Hands-down, the worst day of the month was the 1st, regardless of the month. Starting from zero every month was my stressor to exit the sales department for a steady income at the service desk, even though I made more in sales.
While the commission pay was lucrative, consistency at a slightly lower pay may have kept me selling cars. That's my .02 on personal experience.
DrivingSales
@Jason - I know that a lot of dealers are looking into this. They are trying to flatten pay so it is more consistent. Good insight.
ACT Auto Staffing & ACTautostaffing.com
This article is so rich of old school/new school. However, where is the average dealership attitude? "Hey, I was thrown to the wolves and made it, why should it be different now?" Because most managers came up in the turn or burn, very few managers and dealers are ready for a changing workforce
Handlon Business Resources
Great article Adam! Two things come to mind from my seven years working in sales, BDC and internet departments.
The first I feel is paramount! Making your sales people feel that they are appreciated. Recognition goes a long way. Make annual reviews quarterly reviews. It will be mutually beneficial. You can get a better idea of the morale of the sales person and be able to guide them in a positive manner. All too often the annual review is mostly affected by what occurred last month!
The second is compensation. Money is not the only issue. Ever consider how much time a sales person spends at the dealership? They spend more time trying to make a paycheck then they do with their families. Offer them a shorter work week while leaving the option that they are welcome to come in and sell if they want/need to. There were several people I worked with who would have loved to be with there children coaching or even just watching their children play sports that couldn't because of their work hours.
Show them you care and they are appreciated and they will always perform better. It will be a win-win situation!
DrivingSales
@Mark Great comment! There are more options to make people feel valued than just a paycheck.
Fixed Ops Director
Agreed I just want to be the best and want 2nd place so far back you can't see them.
DrivingSales
Addressing the Silent Killer: Turnover
Dealer Executives Underestimate Cost of Staff Turnover by $97,000 Despite Investments to Improve Employee Retention
A study from DrivingSales, in partnership with Hireology, found that dealer executives underestimate their turnover by 20% for their entire dealership and 27% among their sales team. This indicates a major disconnect in the dealership that is coming at a potentially significant cost to dealership profitability. Adding to the issue is the fact that dealers are not effectively addressing the problem: according to the survey most dealerships are potential incorrectly devoting resources to reversing this costly trend.
On average, the overall dealership turnover rate reported by Dealer Principals, General Managers and Owners was 22% compared to the 42% that the 2016 NADA Workforce Study identified. The discrepancy for the sales team was even larger, with dealer executives reporting an average 40% sales teams turnover rate versus the 67% reported by NADA.
Based on research performed by DrivingSales, each sales person that leaves a dealership can cost the bottom line $45,000 (other sources estimate this number higher) and the total turnover cost per dealership averages nearly $439,000 annually. This means, based on the underestimation in sales turnover, that dealer executives are underestimating the cost staff turnover of their dealership by $97,000, assuming they are even aware of the bottom line loss.
The survey further revealed that most dealers are unaware of the financial impact turnover has within their dealerships and, with a lack of transparency into this impact. The majority (over 80%) of dealerships report that they do not have a dedicated person/team focused on hiring, training or retraining their staff. These responsibilities overwhelmingly are assigned to individual department managers. Not only does the lack of focused attention indicate why dealer executives are unaware of their true turnover rate and the costs associated with it, but it reveals a core issue underlying the problem of staff turnover.
Dealers Are Addressing Turnover, But Is It Working?
Although dealer executives underestimate their turnover rate, they do not ignore the issue of turnover completely. 60% plus executives reported that turnover had a major impact to their operations in all departments except their Internet/BDC department (49%). Dealer executives felt that the sales department was impacted the most by turnover.
64% of dealers report that they have made some sort of changes to their policies to address the issue of sales turnover. The two most frequent changes to policies were:
- Changing Commission vs. Base Pay Structure
- Increasing Entering Compensation.
The majority of dealers focused their Human Resources changes on activities to attract candidates, such as improving income pay structures and increasing employment outreach, instead of making investments in post-hire experience (days worked, vacation policy and career opportunities).
Is This Motivating Employees?
The investments that dealers have made in compensation structure shows that they feel their best tool to attract and retain candidates is through financial incentives. But studies outside of the automotive industry indicate that dollars are not as impactful on retention as other incentives, such as on-the-job career development and flexible schedules. Initial research from DrivingSales indicates that while less than half as many dealerships invested in career development for their employees as those that focused on cash incentives, these alternative incentives are significant (and less costly) retention and recruitment motivators.
In a study, to be fully released in 2017, DrivingSales surveyed more than 1,000 dealer professionals to identify their motivations at work. 47% of sales people surveyed said their top motivator was money, as expected. However, 36% stated that their largest motivations were personal development and career progress.
Although the majority of salespeople are motivated financially, it is important to point out that by not investing in post-hire development many dealers are missing an additional point of motivation. Balancing financial incentives with career development can result in increased retention of their total sales teams.
The results of both this study and the 2016 NADA Workforce Study indicate that turnover is impacting dealer operations -- and the bottom line. Although most dealers are underestimating the impact it is making in their business, they are aware of the issue and are trying to make adjustments to decrease turnover. But are they the right adjustments?
5 Comments
Dealers Marketing Network
Adam, thanks for sharing this information. I believe your numbers are accurate, but to dealer owners and managers there is nothing new here for them. They already know the issues, they have heard time and time again from every industry publication and from vendors and OEMs too. One Detroit OEM shared with me that every year they lose 50% of sales people in their dealerships. I asked them how could they possibly maintain or build customer loyalty with that kind of turnover. Their response . . . “Exactly! We can’t and it’s killing us.”
Our business is not an easy one, and there are multiple challenges at multiple levels. From my 20+ years in the business and experience working as a car salesman, manager, and then executive with large national lenders, I believe the problem is 66% the fault of the dealership and 34% the fault of the OEMs. OEM incentive plans (stair step programs), a rigged CSI system + micro managing many of the local dealer processes and vendor selection continues to cause a significant part of the problem. OEMs don’t see dealer turnover as their problem but one for the dealer to deal with, after all the dealer is the customer of the OEM. Chrysler even offered a college tuition reimbursement plan for dealer employees, but even that effort failed as people didn’t stay around long enough to take advantage of it.
When OEM policies are introduced dealers adjust their goals and behaviors to hit sales targets and capture those extra $$$$. Essentially the dealer is “working his pay plan.” This is what causes the public to not trust auto dealers, and indirectly not trust the products the dealer is selling.
Dealers do have alternatives to work around these issues but most choose not to as they lack the vision, entrepreneurial spirit, or willingness to deviate from the OEM norm.
DrivingSales
Great points Mark. This problem is bigger than I think either this study or the NADA Workforce Study or others can fully define. Your insight brings up an angle I honestly did not even think about with this problem, but I think you have a great point. There has to be a balance that achieves the $$$$, retains the customers... and the salespeople.
Auto Industry
We needed yet another "study" to tell us this? We already know closing ratios are 3 times higher when the consumer isn't meeting their sales person for the first time. The math on that naturally follows.
Yes, Dealers AND the OEMs are to blame. Sales people have been the industry's scapegoats for decades, because they are in a position of weakness. Auto retail has run off a LOT of talent over the years. When you turn people over it is ALWAYS a management responsibility. You either made a bad hire, or you did a bad job of management. If you blame the employee your copping out. Take responsibility. Shortened markup. Over Dealering. Increased Packs. Retail Recon. Increased hold back. Panic marketing. It used to be we paid off less at the bank than we collected on a new vehicle deal. Now we pay of more at the bank than we collected and have to wait for a check to break out. How is any of this the sales person's doing? We work them ridiculous hours. Demean them. Pencil them at every turn. What a mystery!
Dealers Marketing Network
David, you are right about these studies. Most of the results are what I call, "A blinding glimpse of the obvious." Any person who has worked in the industry for a year or more knows the problems. we face. It's like telling someone who is way overweight they are fat. It doesn't change the situation, UNLESS the person actually takes action to get a different outcome.
DrivingSales
6 Things I Learned at DSES 2016 (and a few more)
It's been nearly a week since DrivingSales Executive Summit. After sifting through my notes and trying to organize my brain thoughts I came up with my list of top tidbits I'll walk away with and apply (what were yours?):
- John Boudreau - An investemnt in your people always comes back and multiples. Minimize obstacles for your people that stop them from being great!
- Dan Zarrella - There is more data in the world than I ever knew... Pictures get more shares, but even the quality of the pictures matter. Somehow some people think that black and white still counts for "#nofilter".
- Jared Hamilton - There are over 100 competencies that sales people need to be successful. Retaining and growing people comes down to: 1. Assessing thier skills, 2. Developing growth goals, 3. Aligning training to goals/assessments, 4. Measuring success, 5. Incentivizing based on performance.
- Jim Parker - Build a buisness that your customers want to see succeed and survive. The problem isn't finding the right people, it's building the right enviroment; people adapt to their surroundings.
- Ken Schmidt - Get your customers to tell stories about you. People don't tell stories about numbers. You know you are a commodity when no one can tell the difference between you and your competition. Speak your customers' language...not yours.
- Julie Hoffmann - "If you had half the time to commuincate with your customers, what would you say?" Connecting your systems (integrations) should benefit your customers with better experience and faster processes.
Those were the big ones from the keynoters. Looking back on my notes it was hard to trim it down to these...dang there was a lot of learning packed in to three days. Then of course there is the micsellanious category.
- Still my favorite eats in Vegas is the Serendipty II Frozen Hot Chocolate with Peanut Butter (craving one now).
- I averaged 17,000 steps per day over 3 days (can anyone beat that?). Side note - never go to DSES without shoe in-soles... never.
- Favorite quote: "Marketing is solving a problem at a profit." - Jeff Cryder | Canadian Session.
- Virtual reality/augmented reality is on the verge of stepping out of the gaming industry and into the automotive industry.
- Brent Wees has the best hat collection in the world.
- If you want to get into Joe Chura's presentation, come early.
- Somehow it rains at every DrivingSales event. Vegas gets 4.9 inches of rain a year and its mostly came during the past two DSES events.
- The Best Idea competition was one of the best ever at DSES.... THOSE WERE AWESOME!
To sum it up this year's DSES was a blur of awesome learning and great times talking to some of the smartest people in the industry. Thank you to everyone who came and made it great. Now time to get off my duff and get to applying some awesome ideas.
What did I miss? Truth is I can't be everywhere so I want to hear your take-aways....
DrivingSales
Can a Culture Affect Your Bottom Line?
Company culture has become the buzzword of our business generation. However, a debate remains: can a culture have a tangible financial impact?
There seems to be two very polarized sides to this conversation. Those who feel culture is just another hippy-dippy millenialized concept. And on the other end, the believers swear that culture is the most important and defining factor of any business.
If there was one company that has proven financial benefits from culture it has been Southwest Airlines. Somehow in the aftermath of 9/11, the worst economic period ever faced by the airline industry, Southwest found a way to survive and thrive into the future. How did it happen?
Southwest CEO Focuses on “Do the Right Thing”
During DrivingSales Executive Summit in October we will hear Jim Parker, former CEO of Southwest whose tenure included 9/11, discuss how culture sustained the company during the aftermath of 9/11.
While CEO, Parker focused his efforts in creating an internal culture that built the confidence of their employees first so they could feel confident in addressing their customers. He even went so far as cutting executive and board of directors’ wages to ensure that there were no layoffs and no pay cuts.
So did Southwest realize a financial benefit to these cultural investments? Let’s put it this way in the fourth quarter after 9/11 Southwest turned a profit and (as his bio states): “During Jim’s tenure as CEO, Southwest was named as the most admired companies in America by Fortune… remaining profitable in every year.” All of these results Parker attributes in large part to the culture they built as a company.
Freedom Auto Group and Culture
An example even closer to home is Freedom Auto Group where they are not a car dealer, but a “Life Improvement Company.” Eric Savage tells the story of how he stepped away from his family’s dealership to run his own, built on the back of a strong company culture.
Savage shared during DrivingSales Presidents Club in 2016 that he saw his company as a power plant that shared energy through developing a strong culture internally. This culture includes “Gratitude Sessions” and affirmation sticky notes from employees.
Savage admits that it was not easy at first, but now his group is more profitable than ever and he attributes that success directly to the culture his team has built and protects every day.
The Bottom Line
To wrap it up let me share my definition of company culture since there are so many different interpretations on the subject. Company culture is the way that employees are taught (passively or purposely) to respond in every situation. A company may have policies and procedures that outline what an employee does, but culture guides the employee executes those processes.
Policy and procedures tell you what. Culture tells you how.
Your accountant may not be able to track it, but your culture is absolutely impacting your bottom line today. If you take control of it, shape it and cultivate it like Parker and Savage it will be come a positive contributor to long-term profitability.
No Comments
DrivingSales
3 Reason to Stop Believing the Millennials Lie
There is no escaping the love affair with Millennials. Everyone has an opinion on them and how they want to be sold and marketed. Every thought leader is giving their strategy on how to attract them. Every vendor is using Millennials as the reason the newest gadget is a must-buy. With all this attention you’d think that Millennials were the only ones with money.
The chatter about Millennials is they are suspicious of marketing. They rely more on friends than brands, particularly friends they’ve connected with online. They grew up in the information age so they leverage the internet to do research before buying and are purchase savvy. They shop online regularly and expect a seamless online to in-store sales process.
If you think these traits only describe Millennials, you’re wrong. Here are the facts:
- Business Insider reported Amazon demographics showing the online retailer’s buyers age broke down by Non-Prime vs. Prime users, the company’s upgraded account status. The study showed that Amazon customers 40 and up were more likely to purchase Prime memberships than younger generations. 60+ had the highest percentage of Prime users. Result: older generations are attracted to the convenience of premium online shopping.
- Social media isn’t some college dorm obsession. A Report from Pew Research Center found that 71% of adult internet users are on Facebook. Meanwhile InvestorPlace reports that the biggest growth segments for Facebook were for 55-and-up growing 80% and 41% growth in users 35to 54. It seems that older generations are connected online just like their younger counterparts.
- The DrivingSales Consumer Experience Study reports that 99% of car shoppers expect the process to be a “hassle”. That goes across every age group, demographic and vehicle type. The result of this frustration is that 56% of those surveyed would buy more often if the process were easier. Bottom-line everyone wants a better buying process, not just Millennials.
The research about Millennials is all true. They tend to be less brand loyal, distrust marketing, trust friends and do their research. The lie is that Millennials are the only ones who these facts apply to and expect a better buying process. The internet age has rewritten the book on buying process expectations for everyone.
Let me break down two scenarios that occurred during the DrivingSales research initiative: 1. A gentleman goes to a dealership ready to pay cash for a car, but walks out when he is required to give his personal information before a test drive. 2. A shopper is frustrated by a dealer’s website lack of information and refuses to visit the lot because of it. What were the ages of each of these individuals? The demographic assumptions would indicate the opposite of reality. The first gentleman with cash in hand was in his 20s, the frustrated online shopper was in his 50s.
All your customers want more control in the buying process. They want the buying process to be responsive to their needs, not a linear one-size-fits-all model. It’s time to wake up from the Millennials lie and adjust to what all customers really want, a more responsive/personalized sales process.
11 Comments
Lancaster Investments, LLC
Great post Adam. Technology is certainly changing the way consumers interact and make buying decisions. Millennials may be the early adopters of technology but the environment for adaptation is too fast paced to assume utilization doesn't span generations. Humans will always want to interact (and do business) with people they like and trust.
DrivingSales
@Joy Great points. The tendencies of doing business with those we trust/like certainly hasn't changed, just the way we do business. It used to be the only way to establish trust was through face to face, but that has definitely moved online with transparency and ease of transaction.
Mercedes Benz of Taunton
Amen to this stuff. I am a big advocate of a fluid sales process within a wider framework, not a dictatorial sales experience for customers!
Auto Industry
RE: "1. A gentleman goes to a dealership ready to pay cash for a car, but walks out when he is required to give his personal information before a test drive." HINT - You absolutely do NOT do test drives without a copy of the drivers license left in the store. Anyone suggesting that practice be stopped has obviously never owned a dealership. Its always a good idea to learn a business before setting out to change it.
Auto Industry
RE: "They tend to be less brand loyal, distrust marketing, trust friends and do their research."All true. Consumers have always done research. Customers today have so much more information. They also have less ability to unpack that information, so they have more info but "know" less. Its like drinking from a fire hose for them, but they think they know, which can make them really prickly to work with. Auto retail has run off a LOT of talent. Putting a bunch of youngsters who think they know more than they do with youngsters who are inexperienced and who aren't given all the information by their ownership isn't an equation easily solved.BTW, don't think I'm suggesting we give sales people "all the info." I'm not. Its none of their business just as it is none of the business of the consumer. For those who think "transparency" is the answer, I suggest posting your triple net cost and listing your margin separately. See how that works out. Apple will be transparent when they do the same. Do you ask the grocer what the cost is of the head of lettuce you are buying?Another hint to those who want to remake auto retail in the image of Amazon, Apple, Disney, or whomever. We already retail new vehicles for about break even after expenses. And consumers as a group still aren't happy. Decades ago consumers were happier when our industry sold new cars for real net profit. Our mission is to win them over one by one, not try to mollify them as a cohort. If we are successful one out of three times, we're doing well. What piques customers is the thought that someone might have gotten a better deal than they did. Its the FTC that prevents us from sticking to MSRP. If we could, consumers would all be happy, right? They'd all pay the same. There would be no Scott Painter "friction" and we'd be doing a 20 million SAAR, right? How do you please them all? I do my own surveys. Every time I'm in front of a group I ask for a show of hands of everyone who believes a dealer is entitled to an 8% to 10% return. I don't use terms like gross profit and net profit, because few people are accountants. 80% to 90% raise their hand feeling that this is reasonable. A little later I ask the same question differently. "How many of you would be happy if you got home and discovered your dealer had just made a $3K profit off of you. NO ONE raises their hand. Go figure. So much for surveys. What is important is to know what they mean rather than what they say.
Auto Industry
RE: "The result of this frustration is that 56% of those surveyed would buy more often if the process were easier."This is entirely incorrect. You can say that 56% SAID they would buy more often if the process were easier, but until you can measure that, to say they would buy more often just isn't accurate.The process would be easier if consumers all had great credit and no trade negative equity. The process would be easier if we could just ignore all of the government forms and regulations. The process would be easier if new vehicles didn't cost so much..... then there's that pesky sales tax. The process would be easier if we could charge everyone the same. But most people learn as they grow older that we can't change the world until we first learn to live in it the way it is first. And as we grow older, we frequently discover there might be good reasons things are the way the are.
DrivingSales
@David Thanks for the added color to some of my supporting statements. I should have made some points clearer in my post (as you have pointed out): 1. "You absolutely do NOT do test drives without a copy of the drivers license left in the store." Agreed, and that was not the issue with this customer. The customer I referred to in the DrivingSales study was frustrated that the dealer wanted to get his personal information to run is credit before allowing him to test drive the vehicle, that was the point of frustration, not that he was unwilling to give his driver's license. I assumed that would be clear since as you said that is a basic practice in the industry, but I should have made that point clearer. 2. "You can say that 56% SAID they would buy more often if the process were easier, but until you can measure that, to say they would buy just isn't accurate." You are absolutely correct. Just because they SAID they would buy does not mean they would. The point I am trying to make though is that everyone, Millennials and other age groups want an improved buying process and that could result in more sales, not 56% more across the industry, but certainly an increase. Side note: Autotrader conducted a similar study and produced nearly identical results saying that 53% of consumers would buy more, interesting: http://press.autotrader.com/2015-03-31-New-Autotrader-Study-Consumers-Want-Big-Changes-to-the-Car-Buying-Process You make excellent points about price. It is apparent that driving to the lowest prices doesn't make customers happier. What they do want is to trust the they get a fair deal or as you put it "What piques customers is the thought that someone might have gotten a better deal than they did". Great point that: "Our mission is to win them over one by one, not try to mollify them as a cohort. If we are successful one out of three times, we're doing well." This is a slow process that will be won one person at a time, but it can be won. We've seen how Social Media amplifies negative experiences, it does the same for positive as well.
Auto Industry
RE: "Millennials and other age groups want an improved buying process and that could result in more sales, not 56% more across the industry, but certainly an increase."All age groups will answer this question the same way. This is nothing new. 40 years ago the answer would have been the same. But consumers don't have the same idea of what an "improved process" is. Further, this leaves the impression that there is such a thing as an "old process" and a "new and improved process." I don't get that. Demanding personal info to run a credit bureau BEFORE a demo drive was substandard process 30 years ago. Auto retail has always been a slow process to be won one buyer at a time. And dealers are winning to the tune of a 17.3 SAAR. The idea that we'd be selling at a 20 million SAAR rate if we alleviated friction in the sales process isn't valid. You can't "prove" that based on what consumers say in an answer to a survey question. You can "claim" it. You can say I can't prove you wrong. And I can claim my grandmother is in orbit around Mars, and you can't disprove it. I asked both Maryann Keller and Tom Webb about this, and they both laughed at the premise. First, there is no new and improved sales process that satisfies all consumers. While it is true that if you sold all new cars for triple net cost, we would sell more cars, that's not hardly an "improved sales process." Part of the "friction" is the dealer's profit. We are already selling at about break even after expenses. We could reduce "friction" if only the FTC would allow us to charge everyone the same margin. All you have to do is get the FTC to go along with that. More friction is sales tax. Get rid of that and we'd sell a few more cars. But we live and operate in the real world. RE: "This is a slow process that will be won one person at a time, but it can be won."Yes, and dealers are winning to the tune of a 17.3 million SAAR. Regarding "old process" and "new and improved." To reiterate, this is a false comparison. People like Mark Rykess paint some really bad processes and policies as typical "old method." That's just BS. I started my auto business career in what was essentially a One Price store. The year was 1970. It wasn't called One Price then. In 1970 a sales person could make real income. While sales staff turned over, it was nothing like it is now. There was much more of a relationship built between customer and sales person. It wasn't perfect. There is no "perfect." It was better than today. A consumer needed less information because things were much less complex. Consumers knew MORE then than today, not less.
2 Comments
C L
Automotive Group
Keep it simple
Adam Shiflett
DrivingSales
Leslie for the comment... and the win!
I think you summed up beautifully in three words what took me 1,098 words to say.