Digital Dealership System
Lessons from Microsoft: FAIL!
Microsoft Still Doesn't Get "It"
Coming off of WWDC (LINK) - the Apple developers' convention - as well as recent news about updated Chromebooks and Chrome Only "desktops" (LINK)-- I find it hard to notice that the spotlight on Apple and Google put the low-light on Microsoft at a time when it should be using it's marketing might for good -- not evil. But they are foolish, stuck in the past, even as they continue to attempt to innovate - their business practices are not catching up. Microsoft is a multi-billion dollar example of an imbalanced business.
Operating Systems
Google
The Chrome operating system is a web / linux based system that is 99% web functions with offline functions rolling out with updates. The idea is that 99% of business is done on the internet, including databases, web surfing, documents, email, etc -- so a lot of the operating system as we know it (Windows, OS X) are bloatware that slows down the process. Google, by owning the system can make everything faster, easier to use and fundamentally steer people through their services such as GDrive, Apps, etc. Chrome is provided 100% free to anyone that wants to use it.
Google also has the Android operating system, which for it's pros and cons of being an open interface that can be developed upon and customized -- is a great operating system. Google provides this free in order to garner market share, views, traffic to it's products and eventually search - of which generated over $2B in revenue last year from mobile.
Apple
The Apple operating system continually gets faster, easier to use and integrates with more and more Apple products and social features (Twitter / Facebook) with each update. Every year the software has been updated like clockwork while slowly brining the phone iOS and desktop OS X closer together. In fact, the most recent rollout "Mountain Lion" creates a seemless integration between desktop and phone whereas there is instant sharing and continuation of movies and documents across platforms. (MS released a test version of Smart Glass last week that is similar but a distant thought (LINK))
Apple, since it is the only one making the iphone, gives the software away for free to manufacturers (themselves) -- but it also provides sweeping updates for past generations for phones all at once. That is why people look to Apple and never use the word "fragmentation" that they use with Google. This is Google's big downfall and possibly it's only envy of Apple's phone strategy.
When it comes to OS X, the desktop version, Apple charges new users $19 for the update and existing customers who purchase a system from today on, get the update for no charge. The reality is that users are getting a completely new operating system, that is loadable across multiple computers for only $19. (LINK)
Microsoft
Microsoft is making more money off it's licensing and patent defending in mobile then off it's own devices. Report indicate that HTC is paying Microsoft up to $15 per ANDROID phone they sell. (LINK) As Microsoft rolls out it's phone strategy it couldn't get anyone to buy their licensing for Windows Phone 7.5 so it paid Nokia in the amount of $250M+ to be an exclusive partner and committed an ad budget to match Nokias. Nokia will get charged an undisclosed licensing fee for using Windows Phone 7.5 software. Does that make sense?
To dirty the water even more, while trying to get developers into Windows 7.5 they are noting that Windows Phone 8, an extension of their new operating system due by September, is not compatible with Windows 7.5. The hardware, software, apps, etc. will not run Windows Phone 8. So for the 2% of consumers that MS 7.5 count in the market share, they will not get a free upgrade to Windows Phone 8. See another issue here?
Finally, the cash cow of Microsoft is Windows. CEO Ballmer recently said that over 600M windows 7 licenses sold. The retail is $100 and it has been reported that MS charges all but the highest producers close to that $100 per unit. (LINK) As they roll-out Windows 8, the company has expressed that it is a completely new operating system with complete functionality beyond the genius that was Windows 7, including thousands of new features and the wonderful Metro Interface -- and will cost $100. While touting this number as a highlight, they also suggest that users that buy a computer now will have to pay to upgrade to Windows 8 -- albeit at a discount -- what a horribly effective way to stifle the PC buying cycle. (LINK)
How is this Relevant to you
While Apple and Google fight the good fight in getting their systems into as many hands as possible, Microsoft is erecting barriers that aren't working in the new world. While the market is shifting towards a digital revolution, Microsoft is innovating it's products, but not it's business philosophy to match. Microsoft is an imbalanced enterprise.
Most companies are too.
A lot of companies have digitized part of their efforts, moving to online CRM programs, and relying on online reporting, etc. Some are reaching new customers through social media and internet search marketing. But what are they doing with their main business philosophy? The structure of their business? How does all that digital translate into their store to make an impact?
Brick and Mortar
How are you bringing the digital experience into your store?
How are you expressing your digital components to your customers?
Can you bridge the marketing gap between how you got the customer and how you interact with them once you have them?
Internet Companies
Do you balance real custom service to follow-up on digital communication?
Are your customer service forums monitored with real people?
How do you assist customers when a digital purchase or service goes wrong?
Balance. This is a hard act to pursue and it often takes a higher level, outsider approach to see how you can bridge these gaps in your business. If you don't -- you will be left behind by those that do. With businesses being closer to each other in the virtual and real world -- you have a lot of competition and how you balance this digital world is imperative to success.
Todd Katcher
Digital Dealership System
todd@ddsmail.co
c: 615.669.5244
twitter: @digitaldealers
web: www.digitaldealershipsystem.com
blog: www.fouronthefloorblog.com
Digital Dealership System
Zuck Gets Fancy! So Should You
Zuck gets Fancy - PIN THIS!
When Zuckerberg acts, rumors and a mass of people follow.
Recently Zuckerberg "liked" a post on Facebook and the comment went from less then 20 to 20,000 in a matter of minutes. It was a random comment, but the point is that people follow Mark.
So, when Mark recently joined Fancy (thefancy.com), people started asking - what's so Fancy? (LINK)
For all those Pinterest lovers, you may want to pay attention.
Since you only have so much time to waste in your day, may I submit Fancy.com. Not only a very valuable web address, but also a business with a business model that makes sense.
Unlike Pinterest which counts "PINS" the same way that Facebook counts "LIKES" - Fancy.com provides the extra motivation to see what your friend bought, would like to buy or where to buy it yourself. So now instead of just "PINNING" or "LIKING" you can actually follow through with a purchase.
The time factor here is crucial. People only have so much time to "not" do what they are supposed to be doing, like making money, working or volunteering for the less fortunate. This is the reason whey Google+ isn't getting as much traction. People are already wasting their time elsewhere.
This may be Fancy.com's Achilles heal, but it's business model creates a value add that gives it a fighting chance. "Pinning" is one thing. It says what you "like" in pictures. But what is lacks is a way to monetize what you really like. If you like it enough -- buy it -- and here are the places to do so. From clothes to vacations to jewelry (most common pin) to makeup (second most common) -- fancy.com allows you to research and buy actual items from the images.
Imagine what that can do for your business.
What good is a "top pinner" award without dollars?
What if you could have "pinners" turn to buyers? What an amazing way to use not only your business time, but also the time of your customers.
Now you have something to brag about -- how many ___________ did you sell from Fancy.com last month.
Here's another little stat that may get you to move over to Fancy - more men are using the website then on Pinterest and while the average Pinster has 4 pins, the fancier has 58. More people are interacting with Fancy then Pinterest. Here's a little more comparison I found LINK
You will benefit by moving your time and energy to business models that create returns. There are only so many hours in a day -- so many minutes that can be used for social media and other avenues -- why not spend the time and money where you have the best chance to make a difference in your bottom line.
And here is some motivational music for you to GET FANCY!
Todd Katcher
Digital Dealership System
todd@ddsmail.co
c: 615.669.5244
twitter: @digitaldealers
web: www.digitaldealershipsystem.com
blog: www.fouronthefloorblog.com
No Comments
Digital Dealership System
facebook Can't Hear You!
How many "likes" do you have? While all these optimization companies and consultants talk about likes and the power of facebook, a "like" merely means that someone saw your page or your ad and hit, "like" . That's IT. What does a "like" NOT mean?
That someone actually has any clue what your business does. If the other "NOTS" didn't catch you by surprise, the last one sure did. Were you aware that estimates indicate that less then 20% of the people that "like" you actually will see your status update? This article indicates the number is only 12%, but I've seen others go as high as 18% (LINK) This should make sense to you, when you spend the time to think through it -- slowly. facebook is giving away a free service that, while very robust -- needs to make money, especially now that it is public. If you can gather millions of "likes" and communicate with them, why would you pay to advertise? A couple of ideas of advertising would be to get more "likes" or to drive people to your website -- but aside from that, if you could communicate for free to 100% of all your "liked" people, the odds of you paying to advertise is limited. Now comes a value proposition that is being worked out through a beta test. Through research of about 50 articles, the numbers vary as you would expect from a beta test. First off, the parameters are based on how many likes you currently have. For instance, again keep in mind these numbers are just for example purposes, you have 100 "likes" and create a status update. That update will be sent to 100% of those people. But if you have 10,000 likes, that number is more closely related to 10-20% regardless of how many of those people block you from their newsfeed.
Example of a Beta (LINK) The concept of a "promoted" update is that you would pay an incremental amount of $5, $10, $25 to increase that percentage, but it never equals 100% and cannot get by newsfeed blocks. For the beta test, the "promote this" is right next to the submit button as an option. Unlike promoted tweets that are on Twitter, this is a self-serve option that is reasonably priced based on the message, but must be considered an option along with other marketing efforts. Congratulations on having so many people "like" your business - you have succeeded at getting so many people to click the like button. That's it. They clicked. It means nothing more or nothing less, except maybe bragging rights - if that matters to you.
PS> Although technically in Beta, facebook has a page in it's help section:
Todd Katcher |
No Comments
Digital Dealership System
GM - Super-Less Bowl
GM - Super-less-Bowl
GM is at it again. A week after cutting the $12M budget for Facebook, they announce that they will not be advertising in the next Super Bowl. (LINK)
Confusion continues to the goal of marketing and branding efforts. Although this sounds like moves made by the newly hired advertising agency to test how "on board" GM is with the methodology.
GM seems to think that getting 7.5M views on YouTube for it's Silverado after the Super Bowl Commercial that ran in 2012, didn't increase brand awareness. At a cost of $3M, the residual branding efforts of those people and the ad's replay value had to not only increase test drives, but also social buzz beyond the 7.5M.
See the ad here:
What else would GM want?
Maybe they are looking to raise awareness of a new product. Oh, they did that successfully last year too. With the Chevy Sonic. What did GM get for this $3M?
The results were that Edmunds.com reported the Sonic was the #3 top searched vehicle on it's the site the days following the Super Bowl. Most would call that a successful product launch.
Assumptions are a risky business, but in this case, let's assume that GM wasn't happy with the bottom line impact of these ads and that's why they dropped Facebook and the Super Bowl.
Maybe -- following this assumption, GM is putting the money into developing products that people will be interested in purchasing instead of just looking at the commercials. Now that would make sense, but they will never come out and say it.
Although the Sonic ads created traffic, people didn't buy because it didn't compare well with other cars in the market. So the marketing drove them to Edmunds and their dealers, but ultimately, didn't bring out the checkbooks. That's not the marketing department's fault.
Or maybe it's a move by their newly hired marketing agency -- the same one that handles marketing for Snooki.
Branding is a marketing strategy that is important for many companies. On a small scale, branding can be in the form of good will of donations and partnering in local events and charities. On a larger scale, branding can be a Super Bowl advertisement, Billboards, and Social Media Campaigns. While Branding may have no immediate impact on the bottom line, it keeps the product or service in the conversation, allowing the "I heard about that" to come into a buyer's mind.
A tangible example is the cola wars that have been fought for decades. Coca-Cola and Pepsi fight it out through ads that help you make the decision on which to buy -- when your thirsty. But they aren't expecting you to hop in the car because you saw a polar bear drinking a Coke or Michael Jackson dancing on stage.
Branding has to be a consistent message where ROI is considered last. It is a constant - something that you can't turn off - and moves with the times, and in most cases, as with a lot of public companies is determined as a percentage of gross income.
Final disclaimer. There is a lot of advertising that requires ROI -- these are time sensitive and traceable. You know when customers make a purchase decision based on Advertising and it directly effects your bottom line. Don't confuse your budget "pie" when it comes to Advertising vs. Branding or else you may be losing a potential impression that you spent years developing.
|
No Comments
Digital Dealership System
“Oops, forgot about K.I.S.S.” says Android
A recent report states that are close to 4000 different hardware devices using the Android operating system. (link) Another report says that Android now has 59% of the mobile market. (link) Android, which started from a company that Google purchased many years ago, has become an operating system similar to Windows in it's diversity, it's complexity and it's fragmentation. But is there something wrong with this strategy.
Microsoft started it's phone strategy by charging a licensing fee to manufacturers as their way to make money off the operating system. If their product was superior, that may have continued. But today, Microsoft makes more money in the phone business from licensing agreements for patents in the mobile space paid by those manufacturers using ANDROID, then they do from their own operating platform. Of course, at this point - Microsoft's mobile strategy is lacking any vision other then stepping on itself with no revenue model insight. Google is said to make $2B a year off the advertisements in Google Mobile Search. This number will increase over time as more people use mobile as a source of information with Google the embedded resource. While Keeping it Simple Stupid is a good methodology for most businesses, Google has succeed where others would normally fail. Not without their own missteps across the way that challenge the original "Don't Be Evil" motto (which was a slam on Microsoft), Google has been a success at constantly innovating and tweaking. It's the hardware companies that have made this complex. Compare phones to desktop computers. Bring your own hardware to the party and load a Windows Operating System. Did you know the there are still over 50% of uses on Windows XP that is over 10 years old? The desktop computer is as fragmented as the Android mobile space. So, how can we relate all this information and the KISS principle to daily business? The media, and in our lives, our peers often focus on the perceived negative -- when in reality, that negative may be a positive. Fragmentation is a word often thrown around by developers and the like regarding Android. It's true. With almost 4000 devices all with different hardware specs, resolution, etc. it makes it hard for developers to create apps and websites that work across all devices - REGARDLESS of operating system. But where does the blame fall when something goes wrong... App Developer? Hardware? Google? Most often when an app fails people blame the app. At other times, they feel the need to upgrade due to hardware. And sometimes people upgrade to get the latest operating system. What professionals need to do is cut through the clutter and determine if what the perception of reality is -- is truly the reality -- and work with that truth. Move past the clutter and static, focusing on what is truly important for your situation and your success. While KISS is a great principle that can be applied to many circumstances, it is sometimes the circumstance that provides the principle as opposed to the other way around. Think slow, assess from arms length, leave emotion at the door -- and determine the best path for the end result you desire.
|
No Comments
Digital Dealership System
GM is being Naive
GM recently pulled its $12M advertising campaign from Facebook because it was not effective. My question -- effective at what? Let's give the multi-billion dollar company (GM, not Facebook) the benefit of the doubt and say that they may be pulling back the reigns in order to reassess the situation and goals of their campaigns, despite public reports to the contrary. And then let's look at the reason why they were misinformed to begin with. Branding vs. Advertising and their respective goals. My definitions - (may not be textbook) Branding - this involves "getting your name out there" so when you are in the mind of the consumer when they make a purchase. Examples of this are billboards, events, charity and FACEBOOK. Advertising - this involves the actual end result of a purchase that is attached to a particular effort Branding takes a long time to build-up and a short time to fall. That's why it's easier for an existing brand to launch a new product and a new brand, even with a better product has a steeper climb to the same point. Each level of branding has a different impact and results should be measured differently as well. A recent discussion about a business that was paying over $5000/month for billboards and swore by that business model, took down the billboards for a test -- and their sales did not drop. The following month, they put that money towards direct advertising and saw an increase in sales -- actual ROI. Over time, the assumption is that the branding from the billboards does impact business, especially in a crowded market with a lot of advertisers. But the goals should be different. ROI should not be counted when it comes to branding. Advertising on the other hand has a direct impact on sales. Send out x number of emails, postcards, etc. and expect a certain response and a certain dollar return. It's tangible, quantitative and often times repeatable. Advertising has a cause and effect that is on a much shorter time-frame. Send out a coupon, people use it within 45 days or never will. So where did GM go wrong (assuming they did)? They wanted to Facebook advertising to lead to car sales. For a brand as big as GM, the goal should have been BRANDING of their models, features, pricing, etc. and leaving it up to the local dealers to spend their money and determine their tangible ROI which would be much higher based on hyper-local advertising and call to actions that Facebook advertising could create. While the $12M advertising spend is a minimal amount to GM, the negative impact on Facebook leading up to their IPO has been large with people raising lots of questions about their long-term prospects as an advertising medium. But that's another story. (LINK) When considering your overall marketing, a certain amount of money must be spent in both Branding and Advertising -- and your goals must be relative to the expectations and definitions of each. Got questions? Ask away... it's not all about ROI. UPDATE: GM says that it spends $30M on Marketing and $10M on Advertising on Facebook. It is pulling the $10M but says it is re-evaluating and believes in social marketing.
Todd Katcher |
No Comments
Digital Dealership System
7 Tech Decisions that Make you Say HMMM.
When you read a lot you come across a wide range of articles and information that raises an eyebrow and makes you say "hmmmmm".
Queue the music video
This is a short list of 7 Decisions made by Technology companies that make me say "Hmmmm." There will be more, and feel free to add your own. As a note, these are not in order of importance, and while the actual numbers or dates may be off -- the points are still the same. I'm blogging, not submitting a term thesis.
1. Yahoo Buys Geocities
Yahoo is notorious for having great vision and the inability to see that vision to reality. They are a case study of bad management. Here is an early example. In 1999, Geocities was the place where you can go to make your own personal website, interact with others and add all these cool plug-ins. Yahoo, bought them for $3.6B with the intention of wrapping it up into a personal experience called My Yahoo. Sounds like early Myspace, Facebook, Wordpress? Vision, but no follow-through. 10 years later it would shut down in pretty much the same fashion. Yahoo notoriously offered $1B for Facebook in 2006. You can draw your own conclusions by the discrepancy in offer price and current value of the three companies. (Link)
2. Microsoft Posts Videos on Youtube
Microsoft has been doing a good job of coming up with quirky videos to drum up interest and social awareness of their products. They have some good ideas when it comes to stirring the pot and comparing themselves to Apple and other companies. Microsoft posts a lot of links on Facebook, who is a partner (MSFT gave them $250M for that right) and it's a good effort, EXCEPT the videos are all posted on Youtube, who is owned by Google, who makes money off the advertisements they place on Microsoft's Youtube channel. Here's an idea -- Microsoft needs it's own video portal, ie. Vimeo - a company that crushes Youtube with high quality content. I wonder how many ad dollars Google makes off MSFT Videos?
3. RIM Received Patent for Angled Keyboard
RIM, maker of the Blackberry, today (May 9, 2012) received a patent that it originally applied for in 2009 for an angled "trapezoidal" keyboard. In 2009, RIM and Palm were the only ones with a physical keyboard. No one since has tried the angled keyboard and RIM continues to lose market share, down 40% from the same quarter last year. And at their latest event, touting their 10.0 operating system, they had zero devices and no partners to announce. (Link)
4. SPRINT starts selling LTE phones in April 2012
SPRINT was first to the 4G game with WIMAX, which was supposed to transform the industry and failed. As others migrated to LTE and some used gimmicks to confuse customers with what amounts to 3G+, Sprint waivered and finally gave in, dropping their partner Clearwire and committing to rolling out LTE+. By the end of summer 2012, Sprint expects to be in 5 cities -- but that hasn't stopped them from not only announcing phones, but releasing LTE phones that are not backward compatible with the current WIMAX, but will work with 3G. A huge marketing push behind such phones is lined up for selling a device based on speed that cannot be obtained yet --- and even when it is, only 5 cities will have minimal coverage. Huh? (Link)
5. Windows Phone 7.5 $250M Marketing Push
Microsoft invested a few hundred million in Nokia, with the return being that Nokia will become the hardware arm (in a way) for Windows Phone. The agreement is long-reaching with each other investing $24M in app development and offering developers $18,000 per app (based on criteria) for developing for Windows Phone. Sounds like a good idea, except that Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 are coming out later this year and the head of the phone division said that Windows 7 phone hardware won't run Windows Phone 8. Microsoft is so fed up with getting beat up in talks about strategy that they released a system that is only temporary and in the heart of consumers -- a con. It's been reported that people love the Windows Phone, but they want to wait for Windows 8. Throwing money as a situation isn't going to solve the vision issues... and that's why no other company has actually released a Windows Phone to market -- only proto-types. Maybe that's why their Marketing Chief left after 5 months. (Link)
6. Yahoo makes Cuban Rich
Yahoo was at it again in 1999, when it was on a buying spree to be a destination portal without knowing what to do with the assets. Like the Joker said -- Yahoo is like a dog chasing a car, he wouldn't know what to do if he ever caught it. Money! Money bought what was basically Youtube before Youtube existed. Yahoo bought Broadcast.com from Mark Cuban for $5.7B. Yes, that Mark Cuban. Broadcast.com was described as the Number 1 broadcaster for Audio and Video programming on the web. Sounds like Youtube circa 2006, when Google bought them for $1B. Where is Broadcast.com now? Yahoo doesn't know either. (Link)
7. HP buys PALM, then Kills it
Raise your hands if this seems odd. An executive at HP leaves and goes to run PALM where he champions the new PALM Phone that is seen as the best phone without an ecosystem (reference Apple) -- and then sells that company back to HP for $1.2B, profiting significantly on his stock in both HP and PALM. HP never creates one phone with the PALM operating system, basically abandoning the PALM OS and turning it over to an opensource project. HP has yet to come out with a phone strategy after first creating a phone division for windows and then abandoning that too, seemingly not seeing the synergy between, phone, printer, computer, monitor, and web services that every else is now seeing -- reference Samsung / HTC / Apple. (Link)
This isn't a conclusion to the article, just a break. Add your own thoughts below. How does all this apply to your business? Do you have a great idea and no follow-through? Then maybe a solution is needed, like a partner... Steve had Woz, Bill had Paul, Bill had Hillary, Obama has Hillary and Michelle, etc. The absolute best companies are headed by a visionary and a "doer" -- we may not always know who they are, but they are there.
Todd Katcher
Digital Dealership System
todd@ddsmail.co
c: 615.669.5244
twitter: @digitaldealers
web: www.digitaldealershipsystem.com
blog: www.fouronthefloorblog.com
No Comments
Digital Dealership System
Choosing the Right Screen: Part 2 in the Series
Choosing the Right Screen: Part 2 in the Series Whether it's a new dealership, adding screens or finally updating that tube TV -- the choices of TV's in the market place is large and the same size TV can range in price by as much as tenfold. The only way to determine which TV is best for you is to narrow down the choices and then look at your budget. When considering a screen for a professional environment, it will help to understand the definitions starting with quality then types then features of TV's on the market today. TERMS Burn In - Burn in refers the lines and images in the TV that stay behind even when the image on the screen has changed. This occurs when the same image is shown repeatedly or in the case of digital signage -- the same images, borders, backgrounds on the screen at the same time. Megahertz (MHz) - This is a measurement of bandwidth for digital video signals. In other words, how fast the television processes images. The higher the number, the less chance of motion blur or ghosting around images. Tuner - Tuners allow for changing the channel directly on the television. This is only used with cable systems when the COAX is connected directly to the television. Otherwise, when a cable /satellite box is used, a tuner is not necessary because the box acts as the tuner. QUALITY Consumer TV - these TV's can be found at the local Best Buy, Walmart, Target, etc. In general, consumer TV's are meant to be used for no more then four hours a day. Usage more then that suggested time will reduce the longevity of the picture quality. Due to restrictions in useage, Consumer TV's are more susceptible to burn-in. All Consumer TV's have built-in tuners and often put a greater emphasis on aesthetics then Commercial Displays. Consumer TV's can have options such as web-applications, 3D, and multiples of select inputs. Warranties usually indicate consumer use and are range up to one year. Commercial / Professional TV's - designed from the beginning to be in use all day every day, commercial televisions have high quality screens and internal components (power / fans). Most commercial tv's come with a long-term warranty on the complete system that can be up to three years in some situations. Commercial TV's offer a variety of inputs and are versatile to be used in multiple configurations and environments. While not as feature rich as consumer TV's most of the newer systems produce comparable images to their consumer siblings.
TYPES OF MONITORS Plasma - Often referred to as the base point for color reproduction, Plasma TV's offer the brightest of colors while producing the deepest of blacks across the entire TV. High Energy Consumption, High Cost, Higher Weight then comparable sized types of TV's are common negatives when referring to plasmas. In addition, plasma TV's cannot be mounted or stored vertically. All Plasmas are 600MHz LCD - Lighter weight and a energy efficient alternative to Plasmas, LCD's are easier to produce and hence less expensive as well. Available in 60MHz, 120MHz, 240MHz. LED - the newest innovation is using LED (Light Emitting Diodes) to create a vibrant pictures, with large viewing angles while keeping the frame and bezel down to a minimum. LED TV's can be as narrow as 1/4" with negligible bezel providing seemingly edge to edge picture. LED's provide a balance between the weight, energy efficiency, color reproduction, and costs of LCD's and Plasmas. RESOLUTIONS 720P - This standard high-definition resolution is the quality of dvd players and most digital systems including some cable companies, Verizon FIOS and older versions of DishTV and DirectTV. Requires Component or HDMI Connections. 1080P - The highest resolution available today for live broadcast and pre-recorded programming. Blu-ray players, some cable companies, and the newer versions of DishTV and DirectTV Satellite boxes will push the highest resolution when quality is available. Requires HDMI Connection. FEATURES Web Apps - mainly on consumer TV's applications extend the basic functions of the television to allow web access, facebook, twitter, movie streaming services and much more. 3D - visible through glasses (some new systems claim glasses aren't needed) producing an illusion of three dimensional imagery from certain sources and converting standard television. WHICH SYSTEM IS RIGHT A question often asked without a direct answer. Today's commercial displays offer a high-quality experience that is guaranteed for up to three years -- but at a cost of about 50% more then a consumer television. If a 50"+ television is needed for your application, ie. lounge, then the cost of the commercial grade television will be twice the consumer television. In practice, when we recommend televisions for our customers or offer our white-glove service, the priority is on budget and longevity -- a balance. In the lounge, most dealerships will opt for a larger display that provides an experience similar to a customer's home. 50"+ is the norm and for the cost, it is best to go with a consumer television. If you need to replace it in a year because of degradation of picture quality, most owners understand that expense. These TV's can be any style from Plasma, LCD or LCD. When providing a television for a vertical installation, such as a service menu -- we highly recommend a commercial monitor as the content on the screen is limited to 10-20 images that repeat. These commercial displays have warranties to perform the same for up to three years at 24/7 service. In addition, many are located in the service bay where temperatures can vary greatly. Plasma screens cannot be mounted vertically! For those customers that are looking for a multiple monitor configuration, ie. Service Bay, Sales Offices, Showroom Floor -- cost is the biggest challenge. While commercial screens would be best, when installing three-eight screens, that cost of 50% more per screen adds up. For instance, if you were to install 6 screens across sales offices, you may be able to get 42" screens for $600 ($3600) whereas commercial grade screens would cost at least $900 ($5400). While the longetivty of the commercial screens is documented, the up front costs may be harder to rationalize in this situation. The final factor -- aesthetics. I recently had this conversation with a client who was buying 10 TVs. They understood all the parameters and determined that the thinnest, brightest televisions were the "best" for him and his situation. Replacing or fixing in half the time wasn't as important as the "cool factor" of a lightest, thinnest TV with the smallest bezel. The idea was that he wanted people to be "WOWED" by the entire experience of Digital Signs, including the TV. In general, there is no reason to spend extra money for web features or 3D for digital signage solutions. The difference between 720 to 1080 will depend on your preference and the TV signal that is coming through the system. Overall, the choice of TV's a personal one balancing your business requirements, budget and aesthetics.
Todd Katcher |
No Comments
Digital Dealership System
Inputs and Resolutions: Part 1 in the Series
Inputs and Resolutions With so many options to connect your media source to your television, it can be challenging to determine the right choice and filter the clutter and sales pitches that may be thrown your way. In this entry we will address inputs and resolutions because no matter what we have heard or how hard we try, we cannot get all resolutions through every connection option. First - some simple laymen definitions:
Standard connection options:
Resolutions and More
Based on the independent setup of your system, there is a proper cable for you. Ultimately, the cable can only show the highest resolution from the source. Cables aren't miracle workers -- and the connection is most important. Regardless of the cable, if the connector is broken or lose, all the information will not be passed through and the image / sound will suffer.
Todd Katcher |
No Comments
Digital Dealership System
Tiger vs. Phil - Which are You?
Tiger vs. Phil - Which are you? Life is full of ups and downs -- frustrations and anxiety -- and the car dealership business, as well as our personal lives are no different. This past week we found an example of two brilliant extremes of how to handle one's business and how it reflects life. Tiger Woods - for some reason still deemed the World's Greatest Golfer by some - imploded and wound up having one of the highest rounds of golf during a major. During his challenges, Tiger yelled, kicked and cursed on one of golf's most cherished of courses - Augusta National (The Masters).
When things didn't go his way, Tiger kicked his club, verbally That year -- after he was "caught" in a landslide of personal drama that not only broke his will to play, but his relationship and wallet. It seems that some people play by their own rules until they are caught and then play the mea culpa game that we all want to believe, only to repeat again.
Can you relate?
And when he returns to the tour, he is greeted with embraces from players to fans to sponsors. When things on the golf course don't go his way, he is guided by a different light that says it's going going to be ok. This is just another challenge we will get through. He says -- "What can I do better?" There is no blame, there is no "so close" -- it's just about reality. Phil and Amy are respected in the world as not just a great athletic family, but a family of values and morals that guide their every action.
Can you relate? Tiger vs. Phil -- in my eyes it's no competition. Phil would give up everything if it meant spending more time with his family. Tiger did give up everything because he spent time with everyone other then his family. Maybe after work tonight -- for those who are in relationships -- instead of going out with the boys for Happy Hour or working late, bring some flowers home and be the best person you can be for your family, loved ones, and lead a complete life.
Todd Katcher |
No Comments
No Comments