PCG Consulting Inc
Google Publishes A Case Study on Jack Wilson Chevrolet
By Brian Pasch
It is common for dealers to ask me at workshops: "What else could I be doing to sell more cars?"
One of the most exciting areas of opportunity is Facebook advertising when it leverages Polk vehicle ownership data and Google's new Wildfire platform.
Wildfire is an agency level software platform that creates device independent (responsive) pages that can be used in social media engagement, contests, and promotions.
Facebook advertising is not new however Wildfire and Polk data take social media advertising to the next level.
Google Case Study Published
PCG Digital Marketing is please to be the first automotive marketing agency to have an official case study published by Google involving their Wildfire platform. Jack Wilson Chevrolet is using PCG's social media team to increase their website traffic, social media engagement, and car sales.
PCG SocialFire product is built on the Google Wildfire platform and gives dealers the personalized attention of our social media team. Take a minute to download a copy of the Google Case Study with Jack Wilson Chevrolet. Google Case Study
Why Is Wildfire Needed?
Dealers who do not have responsive website design are dissappointing consumers on Facebook because their custom content is often not visible on a mobile device. Over 50% of Facebook engagement (i.e. clicks) are from mobile devices. I have written about this in the past and it is very important. Dealers need to push their vendors to deliver a better mobile website experience.
Wildfire also provides templates to create better engagement pages and data capture forms. The social media analytics is also a strong benefit of using Wildfire so you can measure the impact of your investments in social media engagement. Overall, Wildfire gives agencies such as PCG the tools to supercharge a dealer's social media investment.
How Is Polk Data Working on Facebook?
In one statement: amazing. Dealers are familiar with using consumer vehicle ownership data for direct mail campaigns. Now we can use that same data to target LOCAL consumers on Facebook. The granularity of messaging to a target audience is producing great results.
In fact, we are finding cost per click (CPC) to be much less than similar campaigns on Adwords, and with much better results!
Social Media Advertising (SMA) is in its infancy and over the next year I will be sharing specific success stories and the campaigns that are working to sell more cars on Facebook!
Brian
Brian Pasch, CEO
PCG Consulting
732.672.2356
Google
PCG Consulting Inc
Google Publishes A Case Study on Jack Wilson Chevrolet
By Brian Pasch
It is common for dealers to ask me at workshops: "What else could I be doing to sell more cars?"
One of the most exciting areas of opportunity is Facebook advertising when it leverages Polk vehicle ownership data and Google's new Wildfire platform.
Wildfire is an agency level software platform that creates device independent (responsive) pages that can be used in social media engagement, contests, and promotions.
Facebook advertising is not new however Wildfire and Polk data take social media advertising to the next level.
Google Case Study Published
PCG Digital Marketing is please to be the first automotive marketing agency to have an official case study published by Google involving their Wildfire platform. Jack Wilson Chevrolet is using PCG's social media team to increase their website traffic, social media engagement, and car sales.
PCG SocialFire product is built on the Google Wildfire platform and gives dealers the personalized attention of our social media team. Take a minute to download a copy of the Google Case Study with Jack Wilson Chevrolet. Google Case Study
Why Is Wildfire Needed?
Dealers who do not have responsive website design are dissappointing consumers on Facebook because their custom content is often not visible on a mobile device. Over 50% of Facebook engagement (i.e. clicks) are from mobile devices. I have written about this in the past and it is very important. Dealers need to push their vendors to deliver a better mobile website experience.
Wildfire also provides templates to create better engagement pages and data capture forms. The social media analytics is also a strong benefit of using Wildfire so you can measure the impact of your investments in social media engagement. Overall, Wildfire gives agencies such as PCG the tools to supercharge a dealer's social media investment.
How Is Polk Data Working on Facebook?
In one statement: amazing. Dealers are familiar with using consumer vehicle ownership data for direct mail campaigns. Now we can use that same data to target LOCAL consumers on Facebook. The granularity of messaging to a target audience is producing great results.
In fact, we are finding cost per click (CPC) to be much less than similar campaigns on Adwords, and with much better results!
Social Media Advertising (SMA) is in its infancy and over the next year I will be sharing specific success stories and the campaigns that are working to sell more cars on Facebook!
Brian
Brian Pasch, CEO
PCG Consulting
732.672.2356
Google
No Comments
PCG Consulting Inc
Dealertrack Technology to Purchase AutoAccelerator CRM
By Brian Pasch
Breaking News - Dealertrack Technologies has announced their intent to purchase AutoAccelerator CRM.
This acquisition moves helps to complete their enterprise solutions for car dealers and also supports the observations made in the recent DrivingSales exclusive post "The Six Horsemen of Automotive Innovation."
If you have not read the "horsemen" post, take the time today!
According to Briefing.com "Total consideration for the Transaction is expected to be approximately $13.0 million in cash plus $1.75 million in additional consideration to be paid to the shareholders in 18 months, subject to the achievement of certain milestones."
I had the opportunity to review the AutoAccelerator CRM product at NADA and I was impressed with their mobile CRM solutions. Congratulations to their team and this new marriage!
So what does this mean for the smaller CRM companies on the dance floor waiting to get invited to the acquisition party? Who will be next in the consolidation story of "best of breed" automotive solutions?
Share your thoughts here on DrivingSales.com
Brian
Brian Pasch, CEO
PCG Consulting
732.672.2356
Google
1 Comment
Jubaloo
I had heard this was going to happen soon, but not the CRM that I had been told about. Congrats, now the work begins to integrate the software.
PCG Consulting Inc
Dealertrack Technology to Purchase AutoAccelerator CRM
By Brian Pasch
Breaking News - Dealertrack Technologies has announced their intent to purchase AutoAccelerator CRM.
This acquisition moves helps to complete their enterprise solutions for car dealers and also supports the observations made in the recent DrivingSales exclusive post "The Six Horsemen of Automotive Innovation."
If you have not read the "horsemen" post, take the time today!
According to Briefing.com "Total consideration for the Transaction is expected to be approximately $13.0 million in cash plus $1.75 million in additional consideration to be paid to the shareholders in 18 months, subject to the achievement of certain milestones."
I had the opportunity to review the AutoAccelerator CRM product at NADA and I was impressed with their mobile CRM solutions. Congratulations to their team and this new marriage!
So what does this mean for the smaller CRM companies on the dance floor waiting to get invited to the acquisition party? Who will be next in the consolidation story of "best of breed" automotive solutions?
Share your thoughts here on DrivingSales.com
Brian
Brian Pasch, CEO
PCG Consulting
732.672.2356
Google
1 Comment
Jubaloo
I had heard this was going to happen soon, but not the CRM that I had been told about. Congrats, now the work begins to integrate the software.
PCG Consulting Inc
Building a Mobile First Strategy At The Dealership
By Brian Pasch
You may not be familiar with the term "Mobile First" but it is most likely the most important initiative you can start at your dealership in 2013. Mobile First thinking impacts so many aspects of your dealership success yet few dealers have started their own Mobile First initiative. Dealers need to consider all touch points with consumers and ask one basic question:
"Are my consumer facing communications effective on a mobile device?"
Inspecting your dealership sales, marketing, and operations for a Mobile First mindset includes questions such as:
- How do my website pages look on a mobile device?
- Is my custom content visible on a mobile device?
- Are my emails and newsletters readable on a mobile device?
- Does my service scheduling form work on a mobile device?
- Do my trade-in appraisal tools work on a mobile device?
- Are my SEM campaigns visible on mobile devices?
- Are my social media engagement links broken when viewed on a mobile device?
As mobile traffic is increasing, dealers must have a Mobile First strategy. The majority of consumers who are interacting on Facebook with dealership content are on mobile devices. Mobile SEM campaigns are producing significantly lower cost per lead compared to desktop ads. Everything that touches a consumer must be effective on a mobile device.
Responsive Websites But How About Responsive Emails
I have written about Responsive/Adaptive websites design but why can't dealers send out emails from the CRM that respond/adapt to the screen size of the reader? Well they can, thanks to HTML 5 coding.
You can see from the graphic above, email companies like Mail Chimp have responsive templates for emails. Despite the opportunity, I would estimate that less than 10% of dealers are using responsive email templates.
Most email templates sent by dealers are too large, complex, and format poorly on a mobile device. Yet dealers are asking why email response rates and contact rates are dropping? The answer is simple! We have ignored the move to mobile devices and are pretending that we are still in the year 2000.
This is a big opportunity for dealers who understand just how many people read their emails on a mobile device. This will resonate with dealers who know how many emails are sent each week from their CRM system.
Invest In A Mobile First Strategy
Make the investment to create a Mobile First strategy and your marketing investments and sales processes will see a significant lift. Being the first dealer in your market with a seamless communication strategy will be rewarded with more calls, leads, and sales.
I recommend that you talk with the CRM vendor and your digital marketing partners see discuss who their products and services can be a part of your Mobile First strategy.
Brian
Brian Pasch, CEO
PCG Consulting
732.672.2356
Google
No Comments
PCG Consulting Inc
Building a Mobile First Strategy At The Dealership
By Brian Pasch
You may not be familiar with the term "Mobile First" but it is most likely the most important initiative you can start at your dealership in 2013. Mobile First thinking impacts so many aspects of your dealership success yet few dealers have started their own Mobile First initiative. Dealers need to consider all touch points with consumers and ask one basic question:
"Are my consumer facing communications effective on a mobile device?"
Inspecting your dealership sales, marketing, and operations for a Mobile First mindset includes questions such as:
- How do my website pages look on a mobile device?
- Is my custom content visible on a mobile device?
- Are my emails and newsletters readable on a mobile device?
- Does my service scheduling form work on a mobile device?
- Do my trade-in appraisal tools work on a mobile device?
- Are my SEM campaigns visible on mobile devices?
- Are my social media engagement links broken when viewed on a mobile device?
As mobile traffic is increasing, dealers must have a Mobile First strategy. The majority of consumers who are interacting on Facebook with dealership content are on mobile devices. Mobile SEM campaigns are producing significantly lower cost per lead compared to desktop ads. Everything that touches a consumer must be effective on a mobile device.
Responsive Websites But How About Responsive Emails
I have written about Responsive/Adaptive websites design but why can't dealers send out emails from the CRM that respond/adapt to the screen size of the reader? Well they can, thanks to HTML 5 coding.
You can see from the graphic above, email companies like Mail Chimp have responsive templates for emails. Despite the opportunity, I would estimate that less than 10% of dealers are using responsive email templates.
Most email templates sent by dealers are too large, complex, and format poorly on a mobile device. Yet dealers are asking why email response rates and contact rates are dropping? The answer is simple! We have ignored the move to mobile devices and are pretending that we are still in the year 2000.
This is a big opportunity for dealers who understand just how many people read their emails on a mobile device. This will resonate with dealers who know how many emails are sent each week from their CRM system.
Invest In A Mobile First Strategy
Make the investment to create a Mobile First strategy and your marketing investments and sales processes will see a significant lift. Being the first dealer in your market with a seamless communication strategy will be rewarded with more calls, leads, and sales.
I recommend that you talk with the CRM vendor and your digital marketing partners see discuss who their products and services can be a part of your Mobile First strategy.
Brian
Brian Pasch, CEO
PCG Consulting
732.672.2356
Google
No Comments
PCG Consulting Inc
Autotrader.com To Add Dealership Reviews From Consumers
By Brian Pasch
David Barkholz, Information Technology reporter for Automotive News, broke the story today that Autotrader.com will be adding dealership reviews to their popular website in 2014.
According to Automotive News, Autotrader Group President Sandy Schwartz commented: "I feel we should be agnostic and have an open architecture where a number of ratings are used. I don't think we should be tied to just one."
You can read the article directly on Automotive News.
There are many questions to be answered on how reviews will be implemented on Autotrader.com, especially if they plan to show a compilation of review sources like we see on Google+. Dealers will be anxious to know if there will be any review moderation similar to DealerRater.com or will it require consumers to create an Autotrader.com account, like Yelp.com.
Reviews Influence Consumers
The announcement should not be a surprise for industry watchers who have witnessed the growth and visibility of Cars.com reviews in organic search as well as the growing popularity of sites like DealerRater.com and Yelp.com. Google+ Local reviews are the most influential for consumers using Google's search engine because they are place right underneath the dealer's primary website listing, as shown above.
There are a number of studies that document to impact of reviews on consumer choice and David Barkholz cites a recent study by Volkswagen in his article. Frequent shoppers on Amazon.com or road warriors who reference TripAdvisor.com all know the power of peer reviews. Review platforms for car dealers however have been a source of frustration. So much that OEM's have even created co-op programs to help dealers with their online reputation.
Yelp.com is well known to filter most dealership reviews and only show reviews of active Yelp members. Google+ Local (formerly Google Places) has had a number of policy changes and technical issues over the years that have raised and lowered dealer reviews. The granddaddy of dealership reviews is DealerRater.com which allows dealers, subscribed to their service, moderate reviews before they are published. The DealerRater system seems to be working well for dealers who actively monitor their online reputation. Some dealers may be reading this article and saying under their breath "Now I have another place to check each month?!"
REPUTATION MANAGEMENT IS A GROWING INDUSTRY
If you are a subscriber to Sirius/XM radio, you probably have heard national commercials from Reputation.com. The first time I heard their commercials, I smiled. Internet Reputation Management (IRM) had gone mainstream and in fact, the company's commercials were extremely well scripted. Business owners were put on notice by Reputation.com that negative online reviews would damage their reputation and impact sales.
Today, automotive solutions providers like Dealer.com, Cobalt, Dealerrater.com, and Dominion Dealer Solutions offer car dealers software to monitor online review sites. OEM's have started to encourage dealers to incorporate online review monitoring in their monthly business processes. GM has even taken the aggressive step of requiring dealers to choose one of three "approved" IRM providers to monitor and manage online reviews.
Reputation Management is a booming industry which is attracting entrepreneurs and scammers. Business owners nationwide are being emailed and/or called on a regular basis by companies offering "assistance" to mitigate negative online reviews. Some dealers have been ensnared by companies offering non-compliant review posting services which violate the "terms of service" agreements on popular review sites. Dealers must understand the rules of engagement with online review sites because compliance failures can be costly.
THE IMPACT OF ADDING REVIEWS TO AUTOTRADER
It will take some time to see the full impact of how Autotrader.com implements their review system but one thing is for sure, the real estate on Google Page One will likely now have another search result for Autotrader.com reviews. Dealers reading this article can take a quick test to see the visibility of review platforms, just search your dealership name and add the word "reviews" to the search.
With Autotrader.com's monthly traffic, I would expect their review system to index on Google very quickly just like we noticed when Cars.com added reviews. This means that smaller review platforms will most likely be pushed down the Search Engine Results Page (SERP) when searching for dealership reviews. Having consumer reviews on Autotrader.com gives dealers another tool to amplify their excellent customer service practices and draw more attention to their VDP's and dealership.
Of course with any new review platform comes the potential for negative reviews to be posted, which I consider part of normal business operations. Dealers should not fear that they will get a negative review on Autotrader.com. The opportunity for dealers is how they respond to negative reviews, which often can turn into a win for the dealer. It will be interesting to see if dealers can respond to reviews without being a paying customer of Autotrader.
In any case, adding reviews to Autotrader.com will upset some dealer customers and be seen as an added value to other dealers. The fact that Cars.com paved the way will likely make online reviews a standard on third party classified websites.
What is your thoughts on Autotrader.com adding consumer reviews of dealers? Since we know what the Cars.com system looks like, what changes would you suggest to Sandy Schwartz? DrivingSales.com readers have a great opportunity to provide feedback to Autotrader.com before the system goes live because I am confident Autotrader executives will be reading this post.
So speak up and give the ATC team some guidance.
Brian
Brian Pasch, CEO
PCG Consulting
732.672.2356
1 Comment
Automotive Group
I can still remember standing on my soapbox preaching that reputation management was going to be a very important market and that it was a market that would drive home increases in digital revenue vs. relying on display and search programs. that was 5 years ago at the newspaper media company I was working for as the social & mobile director. Fast forward to today and here we are with about a million more review/listing sites than we had 5 years ago and million more problems too. That being said, I do feel that reputation management is and should be a priority. But over the years it has continued to churn out an unreliable and variable set of rules on both the consumer and business facing sides. I don't see AutoTrader adding any value here. I do see value if they were to integrate with Google or Yelp. That to me has value and promotes the bigger picture. Short of that it appears to just be another place dealers will find themselves defending their reputations and business. Allowing yesterday to hold tomorrow hostage again and again.
PCG Consulting Inc
Autotrader.com To Add Dealership Reviews From Consumers
By Brian Pasch
David Barkholz, Information Technology reporter for Automotive News, broke the story today that Autotrader.com will be adding dealership reviews to their popular website in 2014.
According to Automotive News, Autotrader Group President Sandy Schwartz commented: "I feel we should be agnostic and have an open architecture where a number of ratings are used. I don't think we should be tied to just one."
You can read the article directly on Automotive News.
There are many questions to be answered on how reviews will be implemented on Autotrader.com, especially if they plan to show a compilation of review sources like we see on Google+. Dealers will be anxious to know if there will be any review moderation similar to DealerRater.com or will it require consumers to create an Autotrader.com account, like Yelp.com.
Reviews Influence Consumers
The announcement should not be a surprise for industry watchers who have witnessed the growth and visibility of Cars.com reviews in organic search as well as the growing popularity of sites like DealerRater.com and Yelp.com. Google+ Local reviews are the most influential for consumers using Google's search engine because they are place right underneath the dealer's primary website listing, as shown above.
There are a number of studies that document to impact of reviews on consumer choice and David Barkholz cites a recent study by Volkswagen in his article. Frequent shoppers on Amazon.com or road warriors who reference TripAdvisor.com all know the power of peer reviews. Review platforms for car dealers however have been a source of frustration. So much that OEM's have even created co-op programs to help dealers with their online reputation.
Yelp.com is well known to filter most dealership reviews and only show reviews of active Yelp members. Google+ Local (formerly Google Places) has had a number of policy changes and technical issues over the years that have raised and lowered dealer reviews. The granddaddy of dealership reviews is DealerRater.com which allows dealers, subscribed to their service, moderate reviews before they are published. The DealerRater system seems to be working well for dealers who actively monitor their online reputation. Some dealers may be reading this article and saying under their breath "Now I have another place to check each month?!"
REPUTATION MANAGEMENT IS A GROWING INDUSTRY
If you are a subscriber to Sirius/XM radio, you probably have heard national commercials from Reputation.com. The first time I heard their commercials, I smiled. Internet Reputation Management (IRM) had gone mainstream and in fact, the company's commercials were extremely well scripted. Business owners were put on notice by Reputation.com that negative online reviews would damage their reputation and impact sales.
Today, automotive solutions providers like Dealer.com, Cobalt, Dealerrater.com, and Dominion Dealer Solutions offer car dealers software to monitor online review sites. OEM's have started to encourage dealers to incorporate online review monitoring in their monthly business processes. GM has even taken the aggressive step of requiring dealers to choose one of three "approved" IRM providers to monitor and manage online reviews.
Reputation Management is a booming industry which is attracting entrepreneurs and scammers. Business owners nationwide are being emailed and/or called on a regular basis by companies offering "assistance" to mitigate negative online reviews. Some dealers have been ensnared by companies offering non-compliant review posting services which violate the "terms of service" agreements on popular review sites. Dealers must understand the rules of engagement with online review sites because compliance failures can be costly.
THE IMPACT OF ADDING REVIEWS TO AUTOTRADER
It will take some time to see the full impact of how Autotrader.com implements their review system but one thing is for sure, the real estate on Google Page One will likely now have another search result for Autotrader.com reviews. Dealers reading this article can take a quick test to see the visibility of review platforms, just search your dealership name and add the word "reviews" to the search.
With Autotrader.com's monthly traffic, I would expect their review system to index on Google very quickly just like we noticed when Cars.com added reviews. This means that smaller review platforms will most likely be pushed down the Search Engine Results Page (SERP) when searching for dealership reviews. Having consumer reviews on Autotrader.com gives dealers another tool to amplify their excellent customer service practices and draw more attention to their VDP's and dealership.
Of course with any new review platform comes the potential for negative reviews to be posted, which I consider part of normal business operations. Dealers should not fear that they will get a negative review on Autotrader.com. The opportunity for dealers is how they respond to negative reviews, which often can turn into a win for the dealer. It will be interesting to see if dealers can respond to reviews without being a paying customer of Autotrader.
In any case, adding reviews to Autotrader.com will upset some dealer customers and be seen as an added value to other dealers. The fact that Cars.com paved the way will likely make online reviews a standard on third party classified websites.
What is your thoughts on Autotrader.com adding consumer reviews of dealers? Since we know what the Cars.com system looks like, what changes would you suggest to Sandy Schwartz? DrivingSales.com readers have a great opportunity to provide feedback to Autotrader.com before the system goes live because I am confident Autotrader executives will be reading this post.
So speak up and give the ATC team some guidance.
Brian
Brian Pasch, CEO
PCG Consulting
732.672.2356
1 Comment
Automotive Group
I can still remember standing on my soapbox preaching that reputation management was going to be a very important market and that it was a market that would drive home increases in digital revenue vs. relying on display and search programs. that was 5 years ago at the newspaper media company I was working for as the social & mobile director. Fast forward to today and here we are with about a million more review/listing sites than we had 5 years ago and million more problems too. That being said, I do feel that reputation management is and should be a priority. But over the years it has continued to churn out an unreliable and variable set of rules on both the consumer and business facing sides. I don't see AutoTrader adding any value here. I do see value if they were to integrate with Google or Yelp. That to me has value and promotes the bigger picture. Short of that it appears to just be another place dealers will find themselves defending their reputations and business. Allowing yesterday to hold tomorrow hostage again and again.
PCG Consulting Inc
The Six Horsemen of Automotive Innovation
By Brian Pasch
Over the years, the Internet has created new sales and marketing opportunities for car dealers. To meet these opportunities, automotive vendors have been building single point solutions, which have caused dealers to race around and buy a la carte solutions.
For 2014, the new opportunity is to connect all of the various vendor products into one cohesive platform. OEMs have a big interest in making unified marketing and sales data a reality. Data collected from unified platforms across Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 will revolutionize the manufacturing and distribution of vehicles in the franchise network.
Integrated marketing platforms will be ultimately driven by consumer expectations of a more seamless shopping experience online and in the store. The first time I purchased a computer at an Apple retail store, I was shocked how easy it was to get what I needed and walk out of the store in minutes. The sales representative standing next to me swiped my credit card, my receipt was emailed, and I was handed my purchase in an Apple branded bag.
If consumers do value ease of purchase and ownership then that will reward OEM-Dealer networks that deliver on that experience. Delivering on that experience requires products that work together.
This doesn’t mean that all products have to come from the same vendor, but there is an overall architecture to how they interact, which is defined by a platform provider or industry standards. The Apple/Android App Store model is a business success story, and it is my hope that an eco-system develops for automotive industry technology and services.
To fill this new opportunity, not all vendors have a complete portfolio of products. If you are a student of the automotive industry and digital marketing platforms, you are most likely aware of a horse race that is brewing. The race is made up of six companies that are racing to win the hearts of dealers and manufacturers by creating an integrated sales and marketing platform for car dealers. The promise of a better consumer experience is also sold as part of the presentation.
The six horses in the race own various pieces of technology through their own development efforts, recent acquisitions, and business partnerships. The six horses in the race are Dealer.com, ADP | Cobalt, Autotrader Companies (ATC), Reynolds & Reynolds (including Naked Lime), Dominion Dealer Solutions, and Dealertrack Technologies. Autotrader Companies includes VinSolutions, Haystak Digital Marketing, vAuto, Autotrader.com, KBB.com, Manheim, HomeNet, et al.
The specific platform features of the six companies vary. I will address their perceived strengths and weaknesses later in this article. The six horsemen have different approaches to the race but they have some similarities: reducing the inefficiencies in dealership operations, leveraging mobile technology in the sales process, increasing the effectiveness of marketing dollars, creating a better/shorter consumer purchase experience, and leveraging big data opportunities.
Will Unified Platforms Really Deliver More Sales?
The prize for delivering a powerful end-to-end platform can be very lucrative. It can include OEM endorsements, OEM data partnerships, and exclusive OEM relationships. These OEM relationships create a barrier for competitors to provide core services to dealers. For example, Cobalt has done a masterful job of becoming the primary endorsed brand in GM franchises for websites and digital advertising services and has their products in co-op partnerships for reputation management, and social media.
The companies in the race can’t lose sight of the fact that dealers want to sell more cars at a lower cost regardless of OEM mandates. Cobalt has learned the hard way that the OEM and the dealer are their clients! Technology itself is not a solution to sell more cars; dealership employees have to be able to easily use it! There is less time for strategic errors in this fast paced market, and there is too much at stake (OEM dollars) for these six companies to ignore past integration failures and software launches.
Changing the culture and processes in the dealership to best leverage a new suite of marketing solutions will be a significant challenge for all horses in this race. Just look inside a dozen dealership CRM systems and you can quickly see how difficult it can be for sales professionals to follow a recommended sales process, even if the technology can make them more efficient.
New technology in the sales process will require our industry to rethink everything that we have done in the past, especially to use on iPads and mobile devices. The largest dealer groups in our industry have a lead on restructuring the dealership experience. There will be some resistance to change, so the six horsemen better have a strong in-store marketing and training plan in place.
Integrated platforms have been discussed for years. Cliff Banks was writing about this topic over 10 years ago. Those who doubt that the time or need has come for integrated marketing platforms should think again. For the first time, data integration is making a strong case for dealing with one vendor for websites, advertising, and CRM. In addition, manufacturers see the “big data” goldmine provided by access to multi-channel shopping data on Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 websites and advertising campaigns. This is extremely difficult to achieve without limiting data partners.
Sprint Development & Changing Programming Styles
In any new technology cycle, dramatic efficiencies can be realized immediately. Dale Pollak and the team at vAuto dramatically changed the way used cars were purchased and sold. However, when once “new” features become commonplace, how can these six companies remain innovative and deliver timely new features to their platforms? Market pricing tools are now being integrated in platforms inspired by first to market leaders like Dealertrack Technologies AAX and vAuto.
It is common knowledge that the current CRM platforms from Reynolds & Reynolds, ADP, and Dominion Dealer Solutions had fallen behind in innovation and technology. Their user interfaces and core features have not matched the needs of the market. Server based technology should have been replaced with cloud solutions years ago. Dealers do not easily forget being stuck with outdated software or onerous contracts.
One change on the horizon that will benefit dealers: software development methodologies are evolving. Many companies are moving away from annual software releases and moving toward “sprint” programming teams.
The term “agile development” refers to adding software features every 4-6 weeks, using small groups of developers, so that the programming resources stay aligned with the marketplace.
One company that has impressed me with their agile development is Cobalt. When ADP purchased Cobalt, in late 2010, skeptics said that they would be stuck for years with integrating the ADP and Cobalt website technology. Naysayers said that ADP would drag down the momentum that Cobalt was building in the marketplace.
In fact, just the opposite happened. It took the Executive team just two weeks to make a decision on how to move forward. In the last three years, using agile development, they have released their new Flex Website platform and a series of integrated tools for SEO, SEM, Social Media, and Reputation Management. Their website personalization technology using “big data” is a market first. Dealers will have to get used to Cobalt leading the market and not being late to the party.
Build vs. Buy
Having the components of the “marketing engine” is the first step, but the bigger challenge is integration and optimization. The optimization steps are where most companies fail. History has demonstrated that software acquisitions can be mothballed because the purchaser finds the underlying code too unstable to build upon.
The software development tools today are also making existing software look ancient, even though the software is running in a production environment. A case in point, ADP has begun briefing dealers on a new CRM platform in a new, “ground-up” build; they decided not to build on their existing technology to facilitate the cross-application integration required to deliver more seamless workflows in the dealership. Dealers should get a glimpse of their long overdue CRM upgrade by NADA 2014.
Trying to tie together different software products, which most likely were built on different programming languages, is one challenge. The greater challenge is creating a final product that delivers greater efficiencies and cost savings.
For example, VinSolutions recently purchased Haystak Digital Marketing to add digital advertising to their suite of dealer solutions. Haystak is a strong stand-alone product, however, it would be unfair to compare the digital advertising integration of Haystak and VinSolutions to what Cobalt and Dealer.com have built for their platforms.
The latter two companies have had years of integration experience with their website platforms, backend interface, and client reporting. In fact Cobalt has built an impressive data warehouse, which can analyze multi-channel advertising data to create predictive models. These models can customize dealership websites and increase consumer engagement.
Is Adding CRM The Magic Bullet?
Likewise, adding a CRM platform is not qualification for bragging rights today. The innovation awards will come when inventory data, marketing data, desking tools, CRM reporting, and consumer shopping behavior metrics are seamlessly integrated with the CRM platform to create a better “experience” when consumers contact the dealership.
It takes years to get the bugs out of a new CRM product. Companies like Dealer.com and Cobalt have decided it is better to build a “fresh” solution rather than release one that was acquired. Dominion Dealer Solutions and Dealertrack Technology are hush-hush about their upcoming CRM products, but we should be getting some market announcements in the coming months. Reynolds & Reynolds is just starting to roll out their “new” Contact Management CRM, which is said to be HTML 5 compliant, and replaces “classic” Contact Management.
I have a long wish list for Automotive CRM, and I bet readers of this article can add a few of their own. I would love to see better CRM integration with digital and mobile telephony. I would also like to see better software integration with third party call recording, call scoring, lead scoring, and process scoring data. For example, integrating call/lead inspection data from companies like PhoneNinjas.com, CallRevu, or PCG Consulting would be a great start for initial “App Store” integration. Did someone mention apps?
Will Dealers and OEMs Reward An Open Ecosystem?
In the end, the OEM and/or the dealer has to “vote” that the marketing engine is easy to use and scale for their business. Companies in this horse race are hoping that the OEM makes the decision for the dealer and picks their platform solution; it saves on marketing costs. This is where the horse race gets scary and could upset the eco-system for vendors, consultants, and for dealers.
The Internet is all about speed & change. The race is all about experimenting with fresh new ideas that motivate shoppers at lightning speed. Will the new unified platform handcuff dealers, or, give them “room to run”?
This is an important question, as a dealer’s future success will depend on if the integrated system is open or closed.
For example, let’s look at what’s happening with Apple vs. Android. Apple has a closed system, Android is open. We know the story. Apple once was the leader, but is now losing market share quickly because the Android system is built to allow a community of vendors the freedom to explore new areas. Apple users are forced to wait for Apple to do everything.
Remember Blackberry? They were another closed system, unable to react to Steve Job’s Apple. Do you see the re-occurring theme? Closed systems can create early wins but are very vulnerable to innovation.
I also understand the counter argument of Apple vs. Android. In the app world, Apple has much higher standards than Android. Will our industry lean toward the Apple model because of the sensitive data contained in dealership CRM and DMS systems? There must be a balance between open systems and data security that allows for third party innovation.
Vendors opting for closed systems would be akin to changing out their horse for an elephant in the race. The six horsemen will also have to be more collaborative with their competitors. Larger dealer groups will have a mixture of websites, CRM, and DMS products because of existing contracts and store preferences.
To facilitate collaboration, the automotive industry will need to define new data exchange specifications to allow rich data sets to be passed between unified platforms. The domestic cell phone network is an example of creative collaboration with fiercely competing companies.
Our industry may need a third party to define specifications and bring the six horsemen together to agree on communication protocols. This is roadblock for manufacturers who want to get usable data sets from larger dealer groups or their franchise network if it does not have a single mandated platform provider.
Open Does Not Mean That Everything Is Open
It will be interesting to see which companies embrace the community of developers, trainers, and boutique software solutions with an app store architecture that is not cost prohibitive. A system that rewards innovation and still delivers on the promise of unified data for analysis, big data decision-making tools, and a seamless customer experience.
Will there be limitations on app technology that is approved by the larger vendor community? I think there will be based on past history. I predict that some companies would not give access to their core technology to replace their own advertising solutions.
For example, Dealer.com today does not allow advertising agencies to run Adwords campaigns to their websites and use their replaceable phone number technology. This is critical because paid clicks generate more phone calls than lead forms. The only exception was when Chrysler mandated access to companies approved for co-op funds for Adwords. Where the six horsemen draw the line on any competing technology will be anyone’s guess.
Integrated platforms will force consolidation in the 40+ website providers to car dealers as well as CRM providers. As developments costs get higher each year and dealers expect more from their website partners some companies will just shut their doors. I saw that in New Jersey recently as MJMI ended abruptly. With that said, dealers should note that there are some superstars out there that are beating the marketplace to offer superior core technologies that are giving dealers a competitive edge; Dealer eProcess is one of those superstars.
Rethinking Training, Continuing Education, & Leadership
Software providers have done a poor job of elevating education, training, and certification for dealership sales professionals based on the required skills that the Internet has brought to our industry. When will these six companies copy the successful business models designed by Microsoft and Cisco? These industry giants created an ecosystem of third party certified engineers, trainers and integration partners that became low cost evangelists for their brand. Vendor certification programs could one day be an aspect of the DrivingSales University (DSU) platform.
The six horsemen may also need to change their sales and support models. Today, product specialists mostly call on dealers. A website sales specialist is not expected to know how to launch a paid search campaign for aging inventory. With a unified platform dealership sales and support staff may need to have more multi-disciple training to be effective. This may reduce overall headcount but will raise the bar on the training needed to build tomorrow’s sales and support team.
We have heard much banter about how big data will change our business, but the limitation of innovation comes down to leadership. We can have all the latest technology, rejoice to have mobile enabled software, and salivate over insights into the consumer shopping experience, but our sales and service professionals still have to be able to understand how to use it!
If you want to get a reality check, ask CRM field trainers how satisfied they are on their second/third visit back to the dealership, in regards to staff utilization of what they were taught. In most cases, they are disappointed because management is not holding people accountable, and how can they when they are not competent themselves?
Our industry has spent much time training sales professionals, yet it seems that little focus has been on training Sales Managers and General Managers. The future opportunities brought to market by unified sales and marketing platforms will not be realized unless we invest in our leadership structure at the dealership. Our managers have to become the experts on the new tools that our industry will rely on in the future.
Calling the Race As They Come Around The Turn
How would I call the race today? I’ll answer that, but keep in mind that our industry can change on a dime. It was exciting to see Chip Perry execute his vision to build an automotive powerhouse through acquisitions, but now a new CEO is at the helm. Does the new CEO have the same vision, and will he be able to integrate all the chess pieces in a timely manner?
In the past year, Dealertrack Technologies has been on a buying spree, and their end game is evolving. Will they be adding more companies to their shopping basket? Reynolds & Reynolds is launching their new Contact Management platform. Will it silence critics? Will more OEM’s mandate a single website platform like Chrysler did?
Whatever happens it will be an exciting year ahead for sure! In regards to the race, here is how I call the positions as I see it today:
Leading At The Turn: ADP | Cobalt – This partnership has been a truly symbiotic relationship. ADP infused cash and resources into Cobalt, which has allowed them to add key programming, technical, and customer support staff. For example, Cobalt’s data analytics team consists of 70 full-time professionals! In return Cobalt’s software development culture is transforming the stogy ADP into an agile development juggernaut.
Three years ago, I heard many complaints from dealers about Cobalt’s “outdated” websites and opaque service offerings. Recently, the tide of public opinion has turned as Cobalt seeks to be more dealer-centric, transparent, and competitive by delivering first to market solutions. It is clear that they have learned that dealers and the OEM are their customers. In the past there was too much emphasis on OEM relationships to the detriment of the franchise dealer. They also have “cool” products and technology that make them first in market. A refreshing change!
Cobalt most definitely has the industry’s most sophisticated data warehouse for digital advertising. They are first to market with a personalized consumer shopping experience on the Flex website platform based on big data. If you are not aware how this technology works, you can read my recent article on Cobalt’s Personalized Consumer Experience.
Cobalt’s suite of solutions, that include SEO, SEM, Social Media, and Reputation Management, are being integrated very nicely into their backend dashboard. Their backend interface is not as slick as Dealer.com, but a significant upgrade from what was once a basic set of management tools. Cobalt has a strong reporting engine and excellent graphical representations for SEO, SEM, Social, and Reputation Management. I like the fact that you can export their report data into Excel or ROI-BOT™ very easily for customized reporting and analysis.
Their Flex website platform has a huge upgrade in technology and capability. Cobalt completely widgetized their platform, with each widget being digital “aware” and customizable from the Cobalt data warehouse. It is hard to appreciate the power of their “smart” widget website solution until you see it in action.
In regards to providing an adaptive/responsive mobile website solution, Cobalt has one in the development lab, but no date has been set for general release. This is one area that Cobalt is behind in the marketplace. It will be important to see how quickly they can plug this opportunity leak and deliver a seamless content experience across all device types.
With ADP’s dominance in the DMS world, Cobalt has all the pieces of the puzzle, ample resources, and a successful development model to update their CRM and DMS solutions. ADP DMS has proven itself to be flexible and powerful for larger dealer groups looking for enterprise solutions and owner marketing campaigns. ADP also brings a suite of solutions for Fixed Operations and the back office, which again makes their end-to-end solution so powerful, and even stronger in the years ahead.
ADP is also a leader in integrated dealership telephony, which I hope will have stronger hooks in their upcoming CRM platform. Expect to see ADP’s new cloud-based CRM platform at NADA in New Orleans. If there is one complaint I still hear today, it is that the ADP CRM is too clumsy to use. Well it looks like they are checking off another item on their customer “wish list” very soon.
In regards to dealership training and support, Cobalt has made some significant investments in expanding their field staff and remote support offerings. Cobalt is also proactively discussing with third party trainers how to leverage their resources to create a larger support ecosystem. The combined forces of ADP and Cobalt makes this horse a clear leader in so many areas, and takes the lead as we watch the horse at this turn.
In Second Place by a Head: Dealer.com - People marvel at Google’s corporate offices, but when you visit Dealer.com Burlington offices you can feel the energy that is in the building. Dealer.com has been extremely focused on building world-class solutions from the ground up. Their executive leadership team is smart and the original founding partners are all actively involved in the success of the business. They have the best-designed backend management console for their integrated suite of solutions.
Dealer.com also has an impressive adaptive website design, that is scheduled to be released on the 1st week of October, that publishes properly sized website pages on desktop, mobile, and tablet devices. Many companies claim that they have new mobile technology in development, but Dealer.com is one of the few that can openly demonstrate working technology today.
Dealer.com has done a very good job at providing enterprise data and analytics to larger dealer groups, a feature they share with only Cobalt. They were first to market with VIN-level Adwords campaigns when they released TCD a number of years before companies like Haystak or Showroom Logic existed. Dealer.com has a robust website platform that can be customized very easily and dealers find their software easy to use.
Dealer.com’s new CRM platform is impressive but there are some features and reporting functions that need to be added. This is common in any new product line and I expect that ADP and Reynolds & Reynolds will have similar birthing pains with their new CRM product launches.
Despite being a new product, the Dealer.com CRM user interface and management tools are amazingly simple, yet powerful. Dealer.com’s CRM reminds me of a product that Apple designers would build. Dealers are raving at how easy it is to inspect workflows and assignments to their sales force. When was the last time you heard a dealer rave about a CRM product?
Dealer.com has integrated service offerings for SEO, SEM, Social Media, and Reputation Management. They currently do not offer a DMS product but they have access to both ADP and Reynolds & Reynolds DMS platforms. Their website platform, like Cobalt, has many OEM endorsements and an exclusive with Chrysler and Subaru.
Dealer.com has built most of their platform from the ground up and has not often gone the acquisition route. As a result, integration headaches or incompatible development tools do not limit their platform’s growth. I also have to commend Dealer.com for avoiding rushing new products to market. I think they have learned from the mistakes of their peers; it is hard to take back the damage from a weak product rushed to market.
Finally, Dealer.com built their company on bold marketing campaigns, active evangelists on dealer forums, and being highly visible at industry trade events. The company, as it has matured, has been much quieter and reserved. That said, Dealer.com has the best NADA parties for their customers, which are always fun to attend.
I would encourage Dealer.com to get back to their roots and not conform to marketing models of their peers. Get the energy that is clearly felt in Burlington, and now in Southern California, back in the face of dealers.
Pulling Into Third Place: Dealertrack Technologies – Autotrader.com is not the only company interested in acquisitions. Dealertrack Technologies has been on a buying spree; 20 companies have been purchased in the past nine years. Dealertrack has an industry leading position in credit application processing, electronic document processing, and F&I solutions, but in recent years have added inventory management, websites, and digital marketing solutions by purchasing eCarlist and Clickmotive. Dealertrack is also leading the charge in automotive digital retailing with their online “first pencil” credit tools (called Payment Driver) that can be integrated in any website platform. In fact, the technology is so good that Dealer.com has integrated their Payment Driver technology into the Vehicle Detail Pages.
Dealertrack is one of the few companies that are encouraging dealers to provide solutions that will allow consumers to purchase a car completely online. The consumer of the future may be coming to the dealership to sign a few papers and have a representative go over the features of their new purchase, streamlining the purchase experience.
Many dealers would not know that Dealertrack has a CRM product. That is because it is only offered for dealers using their DMS product. When asked about future upgrades to their CRM platform, all I was told is that announcements would be coming. Since I have not heard much about their CRM tools, I would assume that they pale in comparison to some of the latest CRM products on the market. So we will have to wait on their buy vs. build announcement.
Dealertrack Technologies has OEM website endorsements from Ford and Acura and also a preferred vendor for Gulf States Toyota. Their digital marketing suite, former Clickmotive, is an advanced marketing tool. The company also offers SEO, Social, and Reputation Management services to car dealers.
Similar to Dominion Dealer Solutions, Dealertrack has the big task to integrate all their acquisitions into a unified data warehouse. They also have to create a single-login platform that will allow dealers seamless access to their world-class products, reporting, and analytics to provide increased benefits to their customers. This initiative, called DT 2.0, will be something for dealers to watch because the executive team is focused on creating a unified digital marketing and sales platform.
Dealertrack Technologies nudged out Dominion Dealer Solutions for third place because of the key technologies they own, the breadth of their product offerings, and the fact that they have many industry best of breed solutions. Both Dealertrack Technologies and Dominion Dealer Solutions have equal weakness in their current CRM solutions.
The jury is still out to see how long it will take to create a unified software interface, data integration, and leverage the immense data warehouse that is potentially available to their dealer network.
In Fourth and Closing The Gap: Dominion Dealer Solutions – I consider Dominion Dealer Solutions (DDS) the sleeping giant. For as many great products that they own, I consider their marketing message timid; they need to pound their chests more. They have very happy customers, are viewed by many as a very ethical company, but they need to leverage their successes in the dealership community. For example, dealers love their equity-mining tool (formerly called Deal Activator) and the ROI it delivers is fantastic. This product should be a household name, but isn’t.
DDS has built and/or acquired a number of popular dealer products over the years and recently rebranded their company instead of using their popular product names like Autobase, AVV, Deal Activator, Dealerskins, etc. VinSolutions did a great job at touting the benefits of their unified platform in the marketplace, which I think in part, motivated DDS to create a single brand. Dealers want to deal with less not more vendor companies.
Dominion Dealer Solutions is also proud of their partnerships to build world-class products for dealers; their egos do not demand that they start everything from scratch. By partnering with companies like Microsoft, they believe that they can bring proven innovations from outside of automotive to dealers that will differentiate their offering.
Regardless of their desire to partner with industry leaders, I have to take my hat off to the development teams at Dominion Dealer Solutions. They have delivered the first scalable responsive automotive website platform which is critical for car dealers, whether they know it or not. Google has recently discussed search penalties for website content that does not display properly on mobile devices, which I discussed previously on DrivingSales.
With 30-47% of dealership website traffic coming from mobile devices, responsive/adaptive websites are the next big leap in online marketing. This first to market advantage is significant. I hope Dominion Dealer Solutions can leverage the technology lead with their marketing team. Being first to market was accomplished because of their agile development philosophy, and sprint teams that have been in place for years. Bravo!
Dominion Dealer Solutions (DDS) has products for SEO, SEM, Social Media, Reputation Management, Equity Mining, and of course their industry leading inventory management services company: Dealer Specialties. Their professional services business for SEO and SEM is not as well known or branded but will be a more visible part of a unified marketing platform.
Since Dealer.com, Cobalt, and VinSolutions have in place more mature digital marketing platforms, it will be interesting to see just how Dominion plans to scale integrated marketing campaigns. To date, I have no visibility into the technology, reporting, and website integration they offer for digital advertising.
Dealers will get a chance to learn more about their progress in the fall and see product platform examples at NADA. Speaking of NADA, last year, DDS unveiled their partnership with Microsoft to build a new breed of DMS called Dominion DMX. Dominion purchased an existing DMS company to avoid the learning curve of connecting with OEM data feeds, and are building on the Microsoft Dynamics framework that will have the popular Microsoft interface.
It is too early to know how well the DMX product will do on the market, but if it delivers on its promises, this could be a market changer that encourages defections from DMS platforms that have unhappy customers.
Dominion Dealer Solutions has many pieces of the puzzle in place, now we need to see how they tie all the data together. With no official announcement on the direction of their CRM platform, the jury will be out until them. Autobase, their CRM platform, needs a complete overhaul and how they will upgrade their CRM is not public knowledge right now, but I expect an announcement soon.
I have faith that the leadership team at Dominion Dealer Solutions will deliver some impressive progress at NADA.
In Fifth Place and Holding: Autotrader Companies - In case you did not know, Autotrader Companies (ATC) are owned by Cox Enterprises, a media giant. The loudest voice in the dealership marketing space over the past 3 years has been VinSolutions. I attribute a large part of the success of VinSolutions being acquired by Autotrader to the dynamic personality of Sean Stapleton. That is not to minimize the contributions and business acumen of Sean Wolfington who seems to be in the middle of many big deals in our industry.
Last year, I documented the potential synergies that could be brought to market by a single company owning Manheim, VinSolutions, vAuto, KBB, and Autotrader.com. I wrote a number of articles on my “ideal scene” and one specifically titled: “Will Autotrader Build an Exclusive ZMOT Data Network?” It appears that the screenplay has been put on hold. The visibility that I once had for the product roadmap is no longer there.
The Autotrader acquisition spree, led by Chip Perry, was a way to build a story and a solution set for car dealers that would enhance an initial public offering (IPO) and attract the investor community. I like Chip Perry and supported his vision with eager anticipation of what could be possible.
There were a number of documented missteps in bringing that Autotrader IPO to market which potentially damaged investor confidence. The biggest concern was a $400 million special dividend that was paid to investors three months prior to the filing of the IPO. This was a story penned by Dan Primack from Fortune magazine. The IPO was pulled and soon after followed by the departure of Chip Perry. Recently, one of the oldest investors in Autotrader, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, cashed in their Autotrader shares to Cox Enterprises. What this means for the momentum that Autotrader was building, I do not know.
Will the leadership still have the vision to integrate the pieces or will some companies be sold off? This is a cloud that is hanging over the “head” of Autotrader companies. It is being discussed at dealerships across the country and the sooner clarity is provided to the marketplace the better. In the meantime, Cobalt and Dealer.com must see this Autotrader speed bump as an opportunity to step on the gas.
Despite the leadership changes in ATC, they own great products that dealers love. vAuto, VinSolutions, and Haystak are all award winning technologies in their own right. I like the fact that VinSolutions added the Haystak Digital Marketing solution to their website customers. The Haystak team is passionate and energized by the acquisition, led by Duncan Scarry. The bigger question is how Haystak can be integrated and leveraged to provide dealers with a better sales and marketing platform with the VinSolutions websites. The fact that Haystak is not integrated into the VinSolutions backend interface today puts another layer to campaign management that Cobalt and Dealer.com have already simplified.
The marketplace is also looking for updates on how Autotrader can leverage consumer shopping data from KBB.com and Autotrader.com for customers who also visit a VinSolutions website platform. The potential to customize the website experience or to supplement lead forms submitted by overlapping customers is just two of the benefits this network could produce for car dealers.
Autotrader Companies does not currently own a DMS platform, and I never heard from management that they were interested in going down that path. Their strength is obviously in auto shopping resources (Autotrader.com and KBB.com), dealer websites and CRM (VinSolutions), advertising (Haystak), and merchandising tools (vAuto).
In regards to websites, VinSolutions has been a market disruptor, taking market share from weaker companies due to their “in your face” marketing style. VinSolutions websites and CRM products are popular with dealers and their integration story has been fuel for their growth. Like all fast growing companies, VinSolutions has had their share of growing pains and customer support issues, which have been getting better each year.
VinSolutions has yet to demonstrate a responsive/adaptive mobile website solution for their customers. Mobile visibility and marketing for all the website content pages is a critical element for success with 30-47% of dealership website traffic coming from mobile devices.
With so much invested, I hope that the leadership at Autotrader does not delay in creating a product development strategy that maximizes the popular products that they own before the integration story gets damaged.
In Sixth Place: Reynolds & Reynolds – Let me start by saying that of the six horsemen I have the least visibility into the future plans of Reynolds & Reynolds. Many industry vendors, including companies outside of the six horsemen, take the initiative each year to keep me updated with their product roadmap. Reynolds & Reynolds is not one of those companies that reach out on an annual basis.
Reynolds & Reynolds sells themselves as a Retail Management System; one solution to meet the needs of the dealer. DMS data security concerns have continued an in-store server-based software delivery model. The company seems to be staying with this model while the larger business community moves to cloud based computing solutions. I’m torn between buying into valid cloud security concerns versus lucrative hardware and support contracts that Reynolds does not want to see change.
You cannot ignore the fact that Reynolds & Reynolds has a large piece of the DMS market. Dealers rely on their proven DMS infrastructure to run their business. Recently Reynolds & Reynolds launched “ERA-IGNITE”, a windows based interface to their server-based DMS, which works side by side with their legacy blue screens. IGNITE reduces the keystrokes needed to get work done when compared to their legacy interface.
The IGNITE software allows dealers to create a customized dashboard to see key elements of their business operations. Dashboard modules can include data from Fixed Ops, Accounting, Contact Management, Naked Lime Websites, and DocuPad. Reynolds & Reynolds have a rich suite of variable and fixed operations software and reporting that dealers on their platform love. The IGNITE software allows Reynolds & Reynolds dealers to multi-task, something they have been asking for over the years.
What I don’t see today is a clear integrated solution that is web based to allow dealers to access their data without tunneling through a private firewall or remote access server. This means dealers on their platform are tied to physical servers and maintenance contracts. The business world is moving to cloud based server hosting, which of course is secure, but Reynolds & Reynolds seem to be bucking that trend.
Reynolds & Reynolds is also well known for their Contact Management, their CRM platform. At NADA 2012 Reynolds & Reynolds announced that they would be releasing a web based, HTML 5 compliant version of their CRM. Last year at NADA, the same message was repeated to customers and visitors to their booth. The project management on the new CRM platform has been a disaster; many of their customers are tired of waiting.
The good news is that the new Contact Management (CM) software is finally being released in a limited rollout to dealers in August/September 2013; replacing classic CM. Fans of classic CM loved the tight integration with their DMS so I look forward to feedback from users of the new CM product. Dealers on classic CM cannot do a “soft migration” to new CM to see how it works; it must be a full store cutover.
The new Contact Management platform will have mobile and tablet integration as well as special features for stores with a centralized BDC. Email communications have been significantly enhanced from classic CM, a common gripe from customers. New CM is compatible with I.E. 9.0 and higher, Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. With most new CRM products, reporting is often limited. Customers of Reynolds & Reynolds should ask their sales team to see how many reports are available in the production system today.
In October 2011, Reynolds & Reynolds announced the formation of a new company called “Naked Lime” to sell their website, advertising and marketing solutions. Some have said that the new company was created to separate the digital services from “bad blood” created by older Reynolds & Reynolds contract strategies. Naked Lime was also staffed by younger professionals in the hope that dealers would perceive them as “hip”; a contrast to how Reynolds & Reynolds was perceived. Naked Lime sold dealers the promise of a transparent, full-service marketing solution with “one throat to choke.” The Naked Lime service required a 12-month contract; many know that Reynolds is a contract centric organization. Naked Lime offers websites, social media management, reputation management, digital advertising, and traditional advertising services.
I have reviewed marketing reports from Naked Lime, and while they are graphically attractive, I have not been impressed with the transparency of the marketing ROI. The Naked Lime website product needs a technology refresh and a responsive/adaptive mobile solution. I have no update to share with readers on when a website update would be coming to market.
While dealers who have Reynolds & Reynolds DMS may have a way to see enterprise data across various Reynolds & Reynolds products using ERA-IGNITE, I don’t see a strategy to create a web-based unified reporting and management tool for Naked Lime websites and services. I hope to learn more about Naked Lime’s plans at NADA this year.
I invite the product development team at Reynolds & Reynolds and Naked Lime to start a dialogue with me so that I can better understand their product direction. I will add an addendum to this article and whitepaper so that dealers can better understand, if they plan to build out a suite of products or will they take a different direction than other horses in this race.
The Time Has Finally Come
Our industry has been talking about unified marketing and operations systems for years but there are a few factors why the next 12-24 months will silence doubters. First and foremost is that the OEM’s have tasted the “wine” produced by big data and they want more. When billions of dollars are at stake, franchise dealers will be nudged into compliance.
If you have never witnessed the real-time keyword cloud that Cobalt created to show how consumers are shopping for cars online at Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3, arrange for a demo. As consumer-shopping behavior is tied back to VDP views, calls, leads, sales, service, and financing data the manufactures will save billions of dollars over time. Big data models are already impacting manufacturing and distribution schedules.
The second reason why the timing is right is that the Internet has matured. Powerful mobile device computing has solved the last barriers for 24x7 access. Today’s consumer has a powerful computer sitting by their nightstand, tucked in their purse, or glued to their ear. In the same manner, dealership sales professionals can walk the lot with their entire inventory and desking tools at their fingertips.
Thirdly, consumers want a simplified car purchasing experience as witnessed by the increase in utilization of online “first pencil” tools, credit pre-approval software, and greater transparency of vehicle data; price, performance, styling, safety, and warranty. The auto industry has resisted change despite customer feedback that demanded a shorter sales process. Digital retailing will become a reality and those who “fight the tape” will lose market share.
Lastly, cloud computing and new software development tools have made shared databases, real-time analytics and decision making, and cross-platform integration possible at lightning speeds. The financial and technology barriers have been lowered.
It will be up to the dealer to decide which horse they want to bet on, which of course will be influenced by which company shows the OEM community higher value from an integrated sales and marketing platform.
Since many of the opportunities discussed in the article are not solved, part of OEM selection process will be determined by how well the six horsemen sell their vision and their company’s ability to deliver on the promise of a better future.
The stakes are high and the competition fierce, but in the end it will propel the automotive industry to push to a new level of success and customer satisfaction.
I welcome your comments below.
Dealers who would like a PDF version of this whitepaper can also request a copy here: Six Horseman White Paper
Brian
Brian Pasch, CEO
PCG Consulting
732.672.2356
Google
20 Comments
are you engaged auto sales training
Brian You have outdone yourself ! This is an incredible piece of work I read it twice and and will re read it many times over You have made it so easy to understand the future od Digital Marketing! Thank you so very much for sharing your expertise ! Great Job!
Brickell Motors
Brian, thank you for writing this article. I look forward to the day when companies can integrate the DMS, CRM, Digital Advertising Platform, and Website into one seamless solution/experience.
Ken Grody Ford
Easily the best synopsis of the Automotive CRM/Internet Marketing space I've ever seen. If I had to pick a longshot, I'd take a look at Salesforce.COM. If a vendor could talk Marc Bennihof into bulk pricing for user licenses and build on their AJAX platform, they already have a lot of solid pieces in place for an end to end backbone that could easily be adapted to all three tiers in the automotive industry. They're cloud based and open source too...
PCG Consulting Inc
Chip, you bring up an interesting perspective. Salesforce.com is a powerhouse in cloud computing CRM. I'm note sure how strong their API is to integrate into the many aspects of automotive process. Let's see if this fall any of the remaining holdouts in this race announce a Salesforce.com partnership. The related conversation is related to this line of thought: If all six horsemen will announce by this fall the CRM plans, and four of the six have their own new platforms announced, and these six companies represent the largest players who could make integrated platform investments, who will be in the market to purchase the popular standalone CRM platforms? So either an open communication standard is created quickly or will the bid for these single-point solutions drop?
SHOWROOM LOGIC
Great article You forgot the best SEM program for auto dealers Showroom Logic Jack Rose
PCG Consulting Inc
Jack Thank you for your positive feedback. I actually did mention Showroom Logic in the article, you must have read too fast. :) We have shared clients using your SEM platform, so I know that you are passionate to deliver success for the dealer. Keep up the good work.
Jubaloo
If I had to guess DealerTrack will be the next to purchase a CRM tool. I think at that point they'd have all of the pieces. Brian what are your thoughts on service integration? I know product integration is what everyone talks about, but based on what you have seen don't dealers get tired of the shoddy service that the 6 horseman provide? When some of these products get bought, doesn't it take upwards to over a year for the existing service teams to learn how to work with code, tackle platform data issues, etc... I have a lot of friends that buy a la carte products because service and methodology of that product is superior to some of the others. They struggle with integrations, number of polls a day, etc... When will companies like ADP decide that it is good for business to integrate with all vendors instead of picking and choosing?
PCG Consulting Inc
Darren Your concerns about service and integration are well founded and I am sure that other dealers share your viewpoint. In this article I took time to focus on the need for training and to encourage the six horsemen to consider a more collaborative field support service like Microsoft and Cisco have done. Acquisitions are done for many reasons and our industry has seen some products purchased just to have the software mothballed; they bought the customer base. Not all acquisitions come without the pain of new integration points. Also new versions of products can have the same issues of product bugs, I know that the new version of CM will not have some core features that classic CM customers use on its initial release. I wrote the six horseman article to start a conversation. The first part is that a truly integrated suite of products will be pushed by the OEM to save billions on their balance sheets. Secondly, companies seeking to win the prize have to solve the integration issues with smaller companies that provide services that they don't provide. The app store model was discussed but there are other models as well. Thirdly, an integrated suite will take a restructuring of the sales and support team that work at the companies represented by the six horsemen, as well as mid-tier companies. I can't speak for ADP but I would say that many people are watching the industry changes and they are not blind to past mis-steps that are fresh on dealer's minds. In regards with what Dealertrack Technologies may do about their existing CRM, I think that an announcement will be coming by NADA. Once again, if it is not a purchase, and they decide to buy, it will change the dynamics of the CRM space for single solution platforms.
Ken Grody Ford
I'm also wondering what's going to happen with a couple of other new sources of data, specifically vehicle health reports and GPS based location. Whoever ends up owning this data will have huge opportunities. VHR's are a no brainer for both dealers and OEMs. But LBD is much more complex. The winner of that little fight would be in a position to sell in car advertising opportunities. Not to mention the amount of behavioral data that could be collected and analyzed. Somebody is going to do it. Whether it's a smart phone app that talks to the car's systems, or another device like Google Glass, it's just too rich of a data source to ignore.
DrivingSales
Brain, I've been looking forward to reading this since you teased it last week, and it did NOT disappoint. Great work! There are so many good points that were made but one stood out to me; your points about an "open ecosystem". "Our industry may need a third party to define specifications and bring the six horsemen together to agree on communication protocols." I'll take this to the next step and substitute your word "may" for "must". I don't see any other way around this pinch point. Other industries, especially in the financial arenas, have done a very good job of this and our industry will have to embrace standard protocols in order to move forward.
Independent
Larry, Remember the NADA creation STAR (Standards For Technology in Automotive Retail)? That was our industry's 3rd party attempt at formalizing specifications and guidelines for dealers, vendors and OEMs. I think the last update was published in March 2012. I sat in several of those meetings through the years. It's a huge task - close to impossible because of the fragmented nature of the industry. It accomplished "a lot" but no where near what's "needed" in the industry -- at least, what the perceived needs are.
DrivingSales
Cliff, what did you see as stumbling blocks? Was it just the lack of cooperation, or that the gaps were too wide between platforms? Perhaps both?
PCG Consulting Inc
Cliff I am familiar with the STAR program and like the ADP spec which was last revised 13 years ago, there has not been a committed "will" to stick with past ideas and evolve specifications. In this period of software development, one opinion shared to me is that the larger players may not want to participate until the competitor field in narrowed down. The other way it could play out is that the OEM community push a new specification. A credible third party needs to broker the discussions so they are not one-sided or vendor preferenced. Cliff, do you see an "app store" model possible knowing the well funded players in this race?
Independent
Larry, Brian, It was three things, I believe. First, was a lack of corporation. My perspective was that the bigger players were involved mainly to keep the others from getting an upper hand or setting the agenda. Second, the fragmented industry -- almost 40 manufacturers, 23,000 dealers (at the time), more than 1,000 vendors -- meant hundreds, thousands of data silos with just as many protocols, specifications and ways of moving data around. The investment necessary is mind boggling -- not to mention trying to get everyone to agree to a set of standards. Third, technology was changing way too fast but still was not at the point to where standardizing data was really possible. The advent of XML made it seem possible, but still required huge investments. I remember when the giant CRM company Siebel Systems tried to move all of GM and its dealers to one CRM system -- that initiative blew up because of the complexity and costs and that was just one company. (And just ask Sonic, AutoNation or Lithia who have/are standardizing all of their processes on one system the cost and complexity.) Brian, you mention a credible 3rd party -- I think STAR wanted to play that role, but again, the complexity of the job is mind boggling. In addition to STAR, Oxlo tried to become the interface which handled all of the data integration for everybody. But it never really gained industry-wide acceptance. So as the industry moves toward six big players who control the DMS and other relevant systems -- we likely will see, and probably are seeing already, the developments of six or so different data standards around which integration will become much easier in theory.. All of the vendors who want to and have to business with them will have to play by their rules. But why would a Reynolds, ADP or DealerTrack make it easy for companies with competing products integrate with their systems? (And don't give me that garbage that they should because it's better for the dealer. They're going to do what best for their companies and shareholders....and that isn't necessarily what's best or easier for the dealer.) Keep in mind, this is a journalist's perspective - which can be limited because we don't always see all of the facts. But I did cover this pretty hard for several years....
PCG Consulting Inc
Cliff Your perspective and points are well taken. With fierce competition goes bad blood which can often prevent companies from coming to the table. So, maybe it is the first company that provides an open eco-system for the industry will attract the most 3rd party solutions and becomes the leader because of a "first to market" system.
Independent
Brian, There have been several companies that have claimed to have/offer the open eco-system but didn't have the size or scalability to pull it off. Anyone remember Neo-Synergy or the alleged Microsoft efforts from 4-5 years ago? The truth is, it doesn't make sense for a Reynolds or ADP to seriously play ball here, because we're essentially asking them to make things easier for their competitors -- no company in their right mind will do that. It's a balancing act for them -- make things easier for their dealer customers but not for their competitors. The challenge is that each of the six companies you wrote about are going to have some level of that mentality -- and that doesn't make them bad or unfriendly or lacking in innovation. It just means they're protecting their business interests. So maybe there is a DMS that has yet to come to market that will completely upend the current landscape. That someone will have to break the stranglehold ADP and Reynolds has on the market. Nobody on the market today -- Dominion with its "new" system nor Dealertrack have the ability to pull it off. And I'm not even sure they're thinking that way. Awesome article, Brian. Easily the best overview I've seen on the topic. Let's keep the conversation going....
PCG Consulting Inc
It looks like Dealertrack Technologies filled another slot in their UI with the purchase of Auto Accelerator. Word is that they will take the necessary time to do a full integration of this product into their unified UI, which dealers should see sometime next year. Change is in the air...and the 6 Horsemen are ready to turn the next bend!
Showroom Logic
Independent Dealers can give Showroom Logic a TEST Drive, contact Oliver Malcom at omalcom@showroomlogic.com. The proof is in putting our best foot forward by directing Qualified LEADS to your sales staff.olm
PCG Consulting Inc
The Six Horsemen of Automotive Innovation
By Brian Pasch
Over the years, the Internet has created new sales and marketing opportunities for car dealers. To meet these opportunities, automotive vendors have been building single point solutions, which have caused dealers to race around and buy a la carte solutions.
For 2014, the new opportunity is to connect all of the various vendor products into one cohesive platform. OEMs have a big interest in making unified marketing and sales data a reality. Data collected from unified platforms across Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 will revolutionize the manufacturing and distribution of vehicles in the franchise network.
Integrated marketing platforms will be ultimately driven by consumer expectations of a more seamless shopping experience online and in the store. The first time I purchased a computer at an Apple retail store, I was shocked how easy it was to get what I needed and walk out of the store in minutes. The sales representative standing next to me swiped my credit card, my receipt was emailed, and I was handed my purchase in an Apple branded bag.
If consumers do value ease of purchase and ownership then that will reward OEM-Dealer networks that deliver on that experience. Delivering on that experience requires products that work together.
This doesn’t mean that all products have to come from the same vendor, but there is an overall architecture to how they interact, which is defined by a platform provider or industry standards. The Apple/Android App Store model is a business success story, and it is my hope that an eco-system develops for automotive industry technology and services.
To fill this new opportunity, not all vendors have a complete portfolio of products. If you are a student of the automotive industry and digital marketing platforms, you are most likely aware of a horse race that is brewing. The race is made up of six companies that are racing to win the hearts of dealers and manufacturers by creating an integrated sales and marketing platform for car dealers. The promise of a better consumer experience is also sold as part of the presentation.
The six horses in the race own various pieces of technology through their own development efforts, recent acquisitions, and business partnerships. The six horses in the race are Dealer.com, ADP | Cobalt, Autotrader Companies (ATC), Reynolds & Reynolds (including Naked Lime), Dominion Dealer Solutions, and Dealertrack Technologies. Autotrader Companies includes VinSolutions, Haystak Digital Marketing, vAuto, Autotrader.com, KBB.com, Manheim, HomeNet, et al.
The specific platform features of the six companies vary. I will address their perceived strengths and weaknesses later in this article. The six horsemen have different approaches to the race but they have some similarities: reducing the inefficiencies in dealership operations, leveraging mobile technology in the sales process, increasing the effectiveness of marketing dollars, creating a better/shorter consumer purchase experience, and leveraging big data opportunities.
Will Unified Platforms Really Deliver More Sales?
The prize for delivering a powerful end-to-end platform can be very lucrative. It can include OEM endorsements, OEM data partnerships, and exclusive OEM relationships. These OEM relationships create a barrier for competitors to provide core services to dealers. For example, Cobalt has done a masterful job of becoming the primary endorsed brand in GM franchises for websites and digital advertising services and has their products in co-op partnerships for reputation management, and social media.
The companies in the race can’t lose sight of the fact that dealers want to sell more cars at a lower cost regardless of OEM mandates. Cobalt has learned the hard way that the OEM and the dealer are their clients! Technology itself is not a solution to sell more cars; dealership employees have to be able to easily use it! There is less time for strategic errors in this fast paced market, and there is too much at stake (OEM dollars) for these six companies to ignore past integration failures and software launches.
Changing the culture and processes in the dealership to best leverage a new suite of marketing solutions will be a significant challenge for all horses in this race. Just look inside a dozen dealership CRM systems and you can quickly see how difficult it can be for sales professionals to follow a recommended sales process, even if the technology can make them more efficient.
New technology in the sales process will require our industry to rethink everything that we have done in the past, especially to use on iPads and mobile devices. The largest dealer groups in our industry have a lead on restructuring the dealership experience. There will be some resistance to change, so the six horsemen better have a strong in-store marketing and training plan in place.
Integrated platforms have been discussed for years. Cliff Banks was writing about this topic over 10 years ago. Those who doubt that the time or need has come for integrated marketing platforms should think again. For the first time, data integration is making a strong case for dealing with one vendor for websites, advertising, and CRM. In addition, manufacturers see the “big data” goldmine provided by access to multi-channel shopping data on Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 websites and advertising campaigns. This is extremely difficult to achieve without limiting data partners.
Sprint Development & Changing Programming Styles
In any new technology cycle, dramatic efficiencies can be realized immediately. Dale Pollak and the team at vAuto dramatically changed the way used cars were purchased and sold. However, when once “new” features become commonplace, how can these six companies remain innovative and deliver timely new features to their platforms? Market pricing tools are now being integrated in platforms inspired by first to market leaders like Dealertrack Technologies AAX and vAuto.
It is common knowledge that the current CRM platforms from Reynolds & Reynolds, ADP, and Dominion Dealer Solutions had fallen behind in innovation and technology. Their user interfaces and core features have not matched the needs of the market. Server based technology should have been replaced with cloud solutions years ago. Dealers do not easily forget being stuck with outdated software or onerous contracts.
One change on the horizon that will benefit dealers: software development methodologies are evolving. Many companies are moving away from annual software releases and moving toward “sprint” programming teams.
The term “agile development” refers to adding software features every 4-6 weeks, using small groups of developers, so that the programming resources stay aligned with the marketplace.
One company that has impressed me with their agile development is Cobalt. When ADP purchased Cobalt, in late 2010, skeptics said that they would be stuck for years with integrating the ADP and Cobalt website technology. Naysayers said that ADP would drag down the momentum that Cobalt was building in the marketplace.
In fact, just the opposite happened. It took the Executive team just two weeks to make a decision on how to move forward. In the last three years, using agile development, they have released their new Flex Website platform and a series of integrated tools for SEO, SEM, Social Media, and Reputation Management. Their website personalization technology using “big data” is a market first. Dealers will have to get used to Cobalt leading the market and not being late to the party.
Build vs. Buy
Having the components of the “marketing engine” is the first step, but the bigger challenge is integration and optimization. The optimization steps are where most companies fail. History has demonstrated that software acquisitions can be mothballed because the purchaser finds the underlying code too unstable to build upon.
The software development tools today are also making existing software look ancient, even though the software is running in a production environment. A case in point, ADP has begun briefing dealers on a new CRM platform in a new, “ground-up” build; they decided not to build on their existing technology to facilitate the cross-application integration required to deliver more seamless workflows in the dealership. Dealers should get a glimpse of their long overdue CRM upgrade by NADA 2014.
Trying to tie together different software products, which most likely were built on different programming languages, is one challenge. The greater challenge is creating a final product that delivers greater efficiencies and cost savings.
For example, VinSolutions recently purchased Haystak Digital Marketing to add digital advertising to their suite of dealer solutions. Haystak is a strong stand-alone product, however, it would be unfair to compare the digital advertising integration of Haystak and VinSolutions to what Cobalt and Dealer.com have built for their platforms.
The latter two companies have had years of integration experience with their website platforms, backend interface, and client reporting. In fact Cobalt has built an impressive data warehouse, which can analyze multi-channel advertising data to create predictive models. These models can customize dealership websites and increase consumer engagement.
Is Adding CRM The Magic Bullet?
Likewise, adding a CRM platform is not qualification for bragging rights today. The innovation awards will come when inventory data, marketing data, desking tools, CRM reporting, and consumer shopping behavior metrics are seamlessly integrated with the CRM platform to create a better “experience” when consumers contact the dealership.
It takes years to get the bugs out of a new CRM product. Companies like Dealer.com and Cobalt have decided it is better to build a “fresh” solution rather than release one that was acquired. Dominion Dealer Solutions and Dealertrack Technology are hush-hush about their upcoming CRM products, but we should be getting some market announcements in the coming months. Reynolds & Reynolds is just starting to roll out their “new” Contact Management CRM, which is said to be HTML 5 compliant, and replaces “classic” Contact Management.
I have a long wish list for Automotive CRM, and I bet readers of this article can add a few of their own. I would love to see better CRM integration with digital and mobile telephony. I would also like to see better software integration with third party call recording, call scoring, lead scoring, and process scoring data. For example, integrating call/lead inspection data from companies like PhoneNinjas.com, CallRevu, or PCG Consulting would be a great start for initial “App Store” integration. Did someone mention apps?
Will Dealers and OEMs Reward An Open Ecosystem?
In the end, the OEM and/or the dealer has to “vote” that the marketing engine is easy to use and scale for their business. Companies in this horse race are hoping that the OEM makes the decision for the dealer and picks their platform solution; it saves on marketing costs. This is where the horse race gets scary and could upset the eco-system for vendors, consultants, and for dealers.
The Internet is all about speed & change. The race is all about experimenting with fresh new ideas that motivate shoppers at lightning speed. Will the new unified platform handcuff dealers, or, give them “room to run”?
This is an important question, as a dealer’s future success will depend on if the integrated system is open or closed.
For example, let’s look at what’s happening with Apple vs. Android. Apple has a closed system, Android is open. We know the story. Apple once was the leader, but is now losing market share quickly because the Android system is built to allow a community of vendors the freedom to explore new areas. Apple users are forced to wait for Apple to do everything.
Remember Blackberry? They were another closed system, unable to react to Steve Job’s Apple. Do you see the re-occurring theme? Closed systems can create early wins but are very vulnerable to innovation.
I also understand the counter argument of Apple vs. Android. In the app world, Apple has much higher standards than Android. Will our industry lean toward the Apple model because of the sensitive data contained in dealership CRM and DMS systems? There must be a balance between open systems and data security that allows for third party innovation.
Vendors opting for closed systems would be akin to changing out their horse for an elephant in the race. The six horsemen will also have to be more collaborative with their competitors. Larger dealer groups will have a mixture of websites, CRM, and DMS products because of existing contracts and store preferences.
To facilitate collaboration, the automotive industry will need to define new data exchange specifications to allow rich data sets to be passed between unified platforms. The domestic cell phone network is an example of creative collaboration with fiercely competing companies.
Our industry may need a third party to define specifications and bring the six horsemen together to agree on communication protocols. This is roadblock for manufacturers who want to get usable data sets from larger dealer groups or their franchise network if it does not have a single mandated platform provider.
Open Does Not Mean That Everything Is Open
It will be interesting to see which companies embrace the community of developers, trainers, and boutique software solutions with an app store architecture that is not cost prohibitive. A system that rewards innovation and still delivers on the promise of unified data for analysis, big data decision-making tools, and a seamless customer experience.
Will there be limitations on app technology that is approved by the larger vendor community? I think there will be based on past history. I predict that some companies would not give access to their core technology to replace their own advertising solutions.
For example, Dealer.com today does not allow advertising agencies to run Adwords campaigns to their websites and use their replaceable phone number technology. This is critical because paid clicks generate more phone calls than lead forms. The only exception was when Chrysler mandated access to companies approved for co-op funds for Adwords. Where the six horsemen draw the line on any competing technology will be anyone’s guess.
Integrated platforms will force consolidation in the 40+ website providers to car dealers as well as CRM providers. As developments costs get higher each year and dealers expect more from their website partners some companies will just shut their doors. I saw that in New Jersey recently as MJMI ended abruptly. With that said, dealers should note that there are some superstars out there that are beating the marketplace to offer superior core technologies that are giving dealers a competitive edge; Dealer eProcess is one of those superstars.
Rethinking Training, Continuing Education, & Leadership
Software providers have done a poor job of elevating education, training, and certification for dealership sales professionals based on the required skills that the Internet has brought to our industry. When will these six companies copy the successful business models designed by Microsoft and Cisco? These industry giants created an ecosystem of third party certified engineers, trainers and integration partners that became low cost evangelists for their brand. Vendor certification programs could one day be an aspect of the DrivingSales University (DSU) platform.
The six horsemen may also need to change their sales and support models. Today, product specialists mostly call on dealers. A website sales specialist is not expected to know how to launch a paid search campaign for aging inventory. With a unified platform dealership sales and support staff may need to have more multi-disciple training to be effective. This may reduce overall headcount but will raise the bar on the training needed to build tomorrow’s sales and support team.
We have heard much banter about how big data will change our business, but the limitation of innovation comes down to leadership. We can have all the latest technology, rejoice to have mobile enabled software, and salivate over insights into the consumer shopping experience, but our sales and service professionals still have to be able to understand how to use it!
If you want to get a reality check, ask CRM field trainers how satisfied they are on their second/third visit back to the dealership, in regards to staff utilization of what they were taught. In most cases, they are disappointed because management is not holding people accountable, and how can they when they are not competent themselves?
Our industry has spent much time training sales professionals, yet it seems that little focus has been on training Sales Managers and General Managers. The future opportunities brought to market by unified sales and marketing platforms will not be realized unless we invest in our leadership structure at the dealership. Our managers have to become the experts on the new tools that our industry will rely on in the future.
Calling the Race As They Come Around The Turn
How would I call the race today? I’ll answer that, but keep in mind that our industry can change on a dime. It was exciting to see Chip Perry execute his vision to build an automotive powerhouse through acquisitions, but now a new CEO is at the helm. Does the new CEO have the same vision, and will he be able to integrate all the chess pieces in a timely manner?
In the past year, Dealertrack Technologies has been on a buying spree, and their end game is evolving. Will they be adding more companies to their shopping basket? Reynolds & Reynolds is launching their new Contact Management platform. Will it silence critics? Will more OEM’s mandate a single website platform like Chrysler did?
Whatever happens it will be an exciting year ahead for sure! In regards to the race, here is how I call the positions as I see it today:
Leading At The Turn: ADP | Cobalt – This partnership has been a truly symbiotic relationship. ADP infused cash and resources into Cobalt, which has allowed them to add key programming, technical, and customer support staff. For example, Cobalt’s data analytics team consists of 70 full-time professionals! In return Cobalt’s software development culture is transforming the stogy ADP into an agile development juggernaut.
Three years ago, I heard many complaints from dealers about Cobalt’s “outdated” websites and opaque service offerings. Recently, the tide of public opinion has turned as Cobalt seeks to be more dealer-centric, transparent, and competitive by delivering first to market solutions. It is clear that they have learned that dealers and the OEM are their customers. In the past there was too much emphasis on OEM relationships to the detriment of the franchise dealer. They also have “cool” products and technology that make them first in market. A refreshing change!
Cobalt most definitely has the industry’s most sophisticated data warehouse for digital advertising. They are first to market with a personalized consumer shopping experience on the Flex website platform based on big data. If you are not aware how this technology works, you can read my recent article on Cobalt’s Personalized Consumer Experience.
Cobalt’s suite of solutions, that include SEO, SEM, Social Media, and Reputation Management, are being integrated very nicely into their backend dashboard. Their backend interface is not as slick as Dealer.com, but a significant upgrade from what was once a basic set of management tools. Cobalt has a strong reporting engine and excellent graphical representations for SEO, SEM, Social, and Reputation Management. I like the fact that you can export their report data into Excel or ROI-BOT™ very easily for customized reporting and analysis.
Their Flex website platform has a huge upgrade in technology and capability. Cobalt completely widgetized their platform, with each widget being digital “aware” and customizable from the Cobalt data warehouse. It is hard to appreciate the power of their “smart” widget website solution until you see it in action.
In regards to providing an adaptive/responsive mobile website solution, Cobalt has one in the development lab, but no date has been set for general release. This is one area that Cobalt is behind in the marketplace. It will be important to see how quickly they can plug this opportunity leak and deliver a seamless content experience across all device types.
With ADP’s dominance in the DMS world, Cobalt has all the pieces of the puzzle, ample resources, and a successful development model to update their CRM and DMS solutions. ADP DMS has proven itself to be flexible and powerful for larger dealer groups looking for enterprise solutions and owner marketing campaigns. ADP also brings a suite of solutions for Fixed Operations and the back office, which again makes their end-to-end solution so powerful, and even stronger in the years ahead.
ADP is also a leader in integrated dealership telephony, which I hope will have stronger hooks in their upcoming CRM platform. Expect to see ADP’s new cloud-based CRM platform at NADA in New Orleans. If there is one complaint I still hear today, it is that the ADP CRM is too clumsy to use. Well it looks like they are checking off another item on their customer “wish list” very soon.
In regards to dealership training and support, Cobalt has made some significant investments in expanding their field staff and remote support offerings. Cobalt is also proactively discussing with third party trainers how to leverage their resources to create a larger support ecosystem. The combined forces of ADP and Cobalt makes this horse a clear leader in so many areas, and takes the lead as we watch the horse at this turn.
In Second Place by a Head: Dealer.com - People marvel at Google’s corporate offices, but when you visit Dealer.com Burlington offices you can feel the energy that is in the building. Dealer.com has been extremely focused on building world-class solutions from the ground up. Their executive leadership team is smart and the original founding partners are all actively involved in the success of the business. They have the best-designed backend management console for their integrated suite of solutions.
Dealer.com also has an impressive adaptive website design, that is scheduled to be released on the 1st week of October, that publishes properly sized website pages on desktop, mobile, and tablet devices. Many companies claim that they have new mobile technology in development, but Dealer.com is one of the few that can openly demonstrate working technology today.
Dealer.com has done a very good job at providing enterprise data and analytics to larger dealer groups, a feature they share with only Cobalt. They were first to market with VIN-level Adwords campaigns when they released TCD a number of years before companies like Haystak or Showroom Logic existed. Dealer.com has a robust website platform that can be customized very easily and dealers find their software easy to use.
Dealer.com’s new CRM platform is impressive but there are some features and reporting functions that need to be added. This is common in any new product line and I expect that ADP and Reynolds & Reynolds will have similar birthing pains with their new CRM product launches.
Despite being a new product, the Dealer.com CRM user interface and management tools are amazingly simple, yet powerful. Dealer.com’s CRM reminds me of a product that Apple designers would build. Dealers are raving at how easy it is to inspect workflows and assignments to their sales force. When was the last time you heard a dealer rave about a CRM product?
Dealer.com has integrated service offerings for SEO, SEM, Social Media, and Reputation Management. They currently do not offer a DMS product but they have access to both ADP and Reynolds & Reynolds DMS platforms. Their website platform, like Cobalt, has many OEM endorsements and an exclusive with Chrysler and Subaru.
Dealer.com has built most of their platform from the ground up and has not often gone the acquisition route. As a result, integration headaches or incompatible development tools do not limit their platform’s growth. I also have to commend Dealer.com for avoiding rushing new products to market. I think they have learned from the mistakes of their peers; it is hard to take back the damage from a weak product rushed to market.
Finally, Dealer.com built their company on bold marketing campaigns, active evangelists on dealer forums, and being highly visible at industry trade events. The company, as it has matured, has been much quieter and reserved. That said, Dealer.com has the best NADA parties for their customers, which are always fun to attend.
I would encourage Dealer.com to get back to their roots and not conform to marketing models of their peers. Get the energy that is clearly felt in Burlington, and now in Southern California, back in the face of dealers.
Pulling Into Third Place: Dealertrack Technologies – Autotrader.com is not the only company interested in acquisitions. Dealertrack Technologies has been on a buying spree; 20 companies have been purchased in the past nine years. Dealertrack has an industry leading position in credit application processing, electronic document processing, and F&I solutions, but in recent years have added inventory management, websites, and digital marketing solutions by purchasing eCarlist and Clickmotive. Dealertrack is also leading the charge in automotive digital retailing with their online “first pencil” credit tools (called Payment Driver) that can be integrated in any website platform. In fact, the technology is so good that Dealer.com has integrated their Payment Driver technology into the Vehicle Detail Pages.
Dealertrack is one of the few companies that are encouraging dealers to provide solutions that will allow consumers to purchase a car completely online. The consumer of the future may be coming to the dealership to sign a few papers and have a representative go over the features of their new purchase, streamlining the purchase experience.
Many dealers would not know that Dealertrack has a CRM product. That is because it is only offered for dealers using their DMS product. When asked about future upgrades to their CRM platform, all I was told is that announcements would be coming. Since I have not heard much about their CRM tools, I would assume that they pale in comparison to some of the latest CRM products on the market. So we will have to wait on their buy vs. build announcement.
Dealertrack Technologies has OEM website endorsements from Ford and Acura and also a preferred vendor for Gulf States Toyota. Their digital marketing suite, former Clickmotive, is an advanced marketing tool. The company also offers SEO, Social, and Reputation Management services to car dealers.
Similar to Dominion Dealer Solutions, Dealertrack has the big task to integrate all their acquisitions into a unified data warehouse. They also have to create a single-login platform that will allow dealers seamless access to their world-class products, reporting, and analytics to provide increased benefits to their customers. This initiative, called DT 2.0, will be something for dealers to watch because the executive team is focused on creating a unified digital marketing and sales platform.
Dealertrack Technologies nudged out Dominion Dealer Solutions for third place because of the key technologies they own, the breadth of their product offerings, and the fact that they have many industry best of breed solutions. Both Dealertrack Technologies and Dominion Dealer Solutions have equal weakness in their current CRM solutions.
The jury is still out to see how long it will take to create a unified software interface, data integration, and leverage the immense data warehouse that is potentially available to their dealer network.
In Fourth and Closing The Gap: Dominion Dealer Solutions – I consider Dominion Dealer Solutions (DDS) the sleeping giant. For as many great products that they own, I consider their marketing message timid; they need to pound their chests more. They have very happy customers, are viewed by many as a very ethical company, but they need to leverage their successes in the dealership community. For example, dealers love their equity-mining tool (formerly called Deal Activator) and the ROI it delivers is fantastic. This product should be a household name, but isn’t.
DDS has built and/or acquired a number of popular dealer products over the years and recently rebranded their company instead of using their popular product names like Autobase, AVV, Deal Activator, Dealerskins, etc. VinSolutions did a great job at touting the benefits of their unified platform in the marketplace, which I think in part, motivated DDS to create a single brand. Dealers want to deal with less not more vendor companies.
Dominion Dealer Solutions is also proud of their partnerships to build world-class products for dealers; their egos do not demand that they start everything from scratch. By partnering with companies like Microsoft, they believe that they can bring proven innovations from outside of automotive to dealers that will differentiate their offering.
Regardless of their desire to partner with industry leaders, I have to take my hat off to the development teams at Dominion Dealer Solutions. They have delivered the first scalable responsive automotive website platform which is critical for car dealers, whether they know it or not. Google has recently discussed search penalties for website content that does not display properly on mobile devices, which I discussed previously on DrivingSales.
With 30-47% of dealership website traffic coming from mobile devices, responsive/adaptive websites are the next big leap in online marketing. This first to market advantage is significant. I hope Dominion Dealer Solutions can leverage the technology lead with their marketing team. Being first to market was accomplished because of their agile development philosophy, and sprint teams that have been in place for years. Bravo!
Dominion Dealer Solutions (DDS) has products for SEO, SEM, Social Media, Reputation Management, Equity Mining, and of course their industry leading inventory management services company: Dealer Specialties. Their professional services business for SEO and SEM is not as well known or branded but will be a more visible part of a unified marketing platform.
Since Dealer.com, Cobalt, and VinSolutions have in place more mature digital marketing platforms, it will be interesting to see just how Dominion plans to scale integrated marketing campaigns. To date, I have no visibility into the technology, reporting, and website integration they offer for digital advertising.
Dealers will get a chance to learn more about their progress in the fall and see product platform examples at NADA. Speaking of NADA, last year, DDS unveiled their partnership with Microsoft to build a new breed of DMS called Dominion DMX. Dominion purchased an existing DMS company to avoid the learning curve of connecting with OEM data feeds, and are building on the Microsoft Dynamics framework that will have the popular Microsoft interface.
It is too early to know how well the DMX product will do on the market, but if it delivers on its promises, this could be a market changer that encourages defections from DMS platforms that have unhappy customers.
Dominion Dealer Solutions has many pieces of the puzzle in place, now we need to see how they tie all the data together. With no official announcement on the direction of their CRM platform, the jury will be out until them. Autobase, their CRM platform, needs a complete overhaul and how they will upgrade their CRM is not public knowledge right now, but I expect an announcement soon.
I have faith that the leadership team at Dominion Dealer Solutions will deliver some impressive progress at NADA.
In Fifth Place and Holding: Autotrader Companies - In case you did not know, Autotrader Companies (ATC) are owned by Cox Enterprises, a media giant. The loudest voice in the dealership marketing space over the past 3 years has been VinSolutions. I attribute a large part of the success of VinSolutions being acquired by Autotrader to the dynamic personality of Sean Stapleton. That is not to minimize the contributions and business acumen of Sean Wolfington who seems to be in the middle of many big deals in our industry.
Last year, I documented the potential synergies that could be brought to market by a single company owning Manheim, VinSolutions, vAuto, KBB, and Autotrader.com. I wrote a number of articles on my “ideal scene” and one specifically titled: “Will Autotrader Build an Exclusive ZMOT Data Network?” It appears that the screenplay has been put on hold. The visibility that I once had for the product roadmap is no longer there.
The Autotrader acquisition spree, led by Chip Perry, was a way to build a story and a solution set for car dealers that would enhance an initial public offering (IPO) and attract the investor community. I like Chip Perry and supported his vision with eager anticipation of what could be possible.
There were a number of documented missteps in bringing that Autotrader IPO to market which potentially damaged investor confidence. The biggest concern was a $400 million special dividend that was paid to investors three months prior to the filing of the IPO. This was a story penned by Dan Primack from Fortune magazine. The IPO was pulled and soon after followed by the departure of Chip Perry. Recently, one of the oldest investors in Autotrader, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, cashed in their Autotrader shares to Cox Enterprises. What this means for the momentum that Autotrader was building, I do not know.
Will the leadership still have the vision to integrate the pieces or will some companies be sold off? This is a cloud that is hanging over the “head” of Autotrader companies. It is being discussed at dealerships across the country and the sooner clarity is provided to the marketplace the better. In the meantime, Cobalt and Dealer.com must see this Autotrader speed bump as an opportunity to step on the gas.
Despite the leadership changes in ATC, they own great products that dealers love. vAuto, VinSolutions, and Haystak are all award winning technologies in their own right. I like the fact that VinSolutions added the Haystak Digital Marketing solution to their website customers. The Haystak team is passionate and energized by the acquisition, led by Duncan Scarry. The bigger question is how Haystak can be integrated and leveraged to provide dealers with a better sales and marketing platform with the VinSolutions websites. The fact that Haystak is not integrated into the VinSolutions backend interface today puts another layer to campaign management that Cobalt and Dealer.com have already simplified.
The marketplace is also looking for updates on how Autotrader can leverage consumer shopping data from KBB.com and Autotrader.com for customers who also visit a VinSolutions website platform. The potential to customize the website experience or to supplement lead forms submitted by overlapping customers is just two of the benefits this network could produce for car dealers.
Autotrader Companies does not currently own a DMS platform, and I never heard from management that they were interested in going down that path. Their strength is obviously in auto shopping resources (Autotrader.com and KBB.com), dealer websites and CRM (VinSolutions), advertising (Haystak), and merchandising tools (vAuto).
In regards to websites, VinSolutions has been a market disruptor, taking market share from weaker companies due to their “in your face” marketing style. VinSolutions websites and CRM products are popular with dealers and their integration story has been fuel for their growth. Like all fast growing companies, VinSolutions has had their share of growing pains and customer support issues, which have been getting better each year.
VinSolutions has yet to demonstrate a responsive/adaptive mobile website solution for their customers. Mobile visibility and marketing for all the website content pages is a critical element for success with 30-47% of dealership website traffic coming from mobile devices.
With so much invested, I hope that the leadership at Autotrader does not delay in creating a product development strategy that maximizes the popular products that they own before the integration story gets damaged.
In Sixth Place: Reynolds & Reynolds – Let me start by saying that of the six horsemen I have the least visibility into the future plans of Reynolds & Reynolds. Many industry vendors, including companies outside of the six horsemen, take the initiative each year to keep me updated with their product roadmap. Reynolds & Reynolds is not one of those companies that reach out on an annual basis.
Reynolds & Reynolds sells themselves as a Retail Management System; one solution to meet the needs of the dealer. DMS data security concerns have continued an in-store server-based software delivery model. The company seems to be staying with this model while the larger business community moves to cloud based computing solutions. I’m torn between buying into valid cloud security concerns versus lucrative hardware and support contracts that Reynolds does not want to see change.
You cannot ignore the fact that Reynolds & Reynolds has a large piece of the DMS market. Dealers rely on their proven DMS infrastructure to run their business. Recently Reynolds & Reynolds launched “ERA-IGNITE”, a windows based interface to their server-based DMS, which works side by side with their legacy blue screens. IGNITE reduces the keystrokes needed to get work done when compared to their legacy interface.
The IGNITE software allows dealers to create a customized dashboard to see key elements of their business operations. Dashboard modules can include data from Fixed Ops, Accounting, Contact Management, Naked Lime Websites, and DocuPad. Reynolds & Reynolds have a rich suite of variable and fixed operations software and reporting that dealers on their platform love. The IGNITE software allows Reynolds & Reynolds dealers to multi-task, something they have been asking for over the years.
What I don’t see today is a clear integrated solution that is web based to allow dealers to access their data without tunneling through a private firewall or remote access server. This means dealers on their platform are tied to physical servers and maintenance contracts. The business world is moving to cloud based server hosting, which of course is secure, but Reynolds & Reynolds seem to be bucking that trend.
Reynolds & Reynolds is also well known for their Contact Management, their CRM platform. At NADA 2012 Reynolds & Reynolds announced that they would be releasing a web based, HTML 5 compliant version of their CRM. Last year at NADA, the same message was repeated to customers and visitors to their booth. The project management on the new CRM platform has been a disaster; many of their customers are tired of waiting.
The good news is that the new Contact Management (CM) software is finally being released in a limited rollout to dealers in August/September 2013; replacing classic CM. Fans of classic CM loved the tight integration with their DMS so I look forward to feedback from users of the new CM product. Dealers on classic CM cannot do a “soft migration” to new CM to see how it works; it must be a full store cutover.
The new Contact Management platform will have mobile and tablet integration as well as special features for stores with a centralized BDC. Email communications have been significantly enhanced from classic CM, a common gripe from customers. New CM is compatible with I.E. 9.0 and higher, Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. With most new CRM products, reporting is often limited. Customers of Reynolds & Reynolds should ask their sales team to see how many reports are available in the production system today.
In October 2011, Reynolds & Reynolds announced the formation of a new company called “Naked Lime” to sell their website, advertising and marketing solutions. Some have said that the new company was created to separate the digital services from “bad blood” created by older Reynolds & Reynolds contract strategies. Naked Lime was also staffed by younger professionals in the hope that dealers would perceive them as “hip”; a contrast to how Reynolds & Reynolds was perceived. Naked Lime sold dealers the promise of a transparent, full-service marketing solution with “one throat to choke.” The Naked Lime service required a 12-month contract; many know that Reynolds is a contract centric organization. Naked Lime offers websites, social media management, reputation management, digital advertising, and traditional advertising services.
I have reviewed marketing reports from Naked Lime, and while they are graphically attractive, I have not been impressed with the transparency of the marketing ROI. The Naked Lime website product needs a technology refresh and a responsive/adaptive mobile solution. I have no update to share with readers on when a website update would be coming to market.
While dealers who have Reynolds & Reynolds DMS may have a way to see enterprise data across various Reynolds & Reynolds products using ERA-IGNITE, I don’t see a strategy to create a web-based unified reporting and management tool for Naked Lime websites and services. I hope to learn more about Naked Lime’s plans at NADA this year.
I invite the product development team at Reynolds & Reynolds and Naked Lime to start a dialogue with me so that I can better understand their product direction. I will add an addendum to this article and whitepaper so that dealers can better understand, if they plan to build out a suite of products or will they take a different direction than other horses in this race.
The Time Has Finally Come
Our industry has been talking about unified marketing and operations systems for years but there are a few factors why the next 12-24 months will silence doubters. First and foremost is that the OEM’s have tasted the “wine” produced by big data and they want more. When billions of dollars are at stake, franchise dealers will be nudged into compliance.
If you have never witnessed the real-time keyword cloud that Cobalt created to show how consumers are shopping for cars online at Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3, arrange for a demo. As consumer-shopping behavior is tied back to VDP views, calls, leads, sales, service, and financing data the manufactures will save billions of dollars over time. Big data models are already impacting manufacturing and distribution schedules.
The second reason why the timing is right is that the Internet has matured. Powerful mobile device computing has solved the last barriers for 24x7 access. Today’s consumer has a powerful computer sitting by their nightstand, tucked in their purse, or glued to their ear. In the same manner, dealership sales professionals can walk the lot with their entire inventory and desking tools at their fingertips.
Thirdly, consumers want a simplified car purchasing experience as witnessed by the increase in utilization of online “first pencil” tools, credit pre-approval software, and greater transparency of vehicle data; price, performance, styling, safety, and warranty. The auto industry has resisted change despite customer feedback that demanded a shorter sales process. Digital retailing will become a reality and those who “fight the tape” will lose market share.
Lastly, cloud computing and new software development tools have made shared databases, real-time analytics and decision making, and cross-platform integration possible at lightning speeds. The financial and technology barriers have been lowered.
It will be up to the dealer to decide which horse they want to bet on, which of course will be influenced by which company shows the OEM community higher value from an integrated sales and marketing platform.
Since many of the opportunities discussed in the article are not solved, part of OEM selection process will be determined by how well the six horsemen sell their vision and their company’s ability to deliver on the promise of a better future.
The stakes are high and the competition fierce, but in the end it will propel the automotive industry to push to a new level of success and customer satisfaction.
I welcome your comments below.
Dealers who would like a PDF version of this whitepaper can also request a copy here: Six Horseman White Paper
Brian
Brian Pasch, CEO
PCG Consulting
732.672.2356
Google
20 Comments
are you engaged auto sales training
Brian You have outdone yourself ! This is an incredible piece of work I read it twice and and will re read it many times over You have made it so easy to understand the future od Digital Marketing! Thank you so very much for sharing your expertise ! Great Job!
Brickell Motors
Brian, thank you for writing this article. I look forward to the day when companies can integrate the DMS, CRM, Digital Advertising Platform, and Website into one seamless solution/experience.
Ken Grody Ford
Easily the best synopsis of the Automotive CRM/Internet Marketing space I've ever seen. If I had to pick a longshot, I'd take a look at Salesforce.COM. If a vendor could talk Marc Bennihof into bulk pricing for user licenses and build on their AJAX platform, they already have a lot of solid pieces in place for an end to end backbone that could easily be adapted to all three tiers in the automotive industry. They're cloud based and open source too...
PCG Consulting Inc
Chip, you bring up an interesting perspective. Salesforce.com is a powerhouse in cloud computing CRM. I'm note sure how strong their API is to integrate into the many aspects of automotive process. Let's see if this fall any of the remaining holdouts in this race announce a Salesforce.com partnership. The related conversation is related to this line of thought: If all six horsemen will announce by this fall the CRM plans, and four of the six have their own new platforms announced, and these six companies represent the largest players who could make integrated platform investments, who will be in the market to purchase the popular standalone CRM platforms? So either an open communication standard is created quickly or will the bid for these single-point solutions drop?
SHOWROOM LOGIC
Great article You forgot the best SEM program for auto dealers Showroom Logic Jack Rose
PCG Consulting Inc
Jack Thank you for your positive feedback. I actually did mention Showroom Logic in the article, you must have read too fast. :) We have shared clients using your SEM platform, so I know that you are passionate to deliver success for the dealer. Keep up the good work.
Jubaloo
If I had to guess DealerTrack will be the next to purchase a CRM tool. I think at that point they'd have all of the pieces. Brian what are your thoughts on service integration? I know product integration is what everyone talks about, but based on what you have seen don't dealers get tired of the shoddy service that the 6 horseman provide? When some of these products get bought, doesn't it take upwards to over a year for the existing service teams to learn how to work with code, tackle platform data issues, etc... I have a lot of friends that buy a la carte products because service and methodology of that product is superior to some of the others. They struggle with integrations, number of polls a day, etc... When will companies like ADP decide that it is good for business to integrate with all vendors instead of picking and choosing?
PCG Consulting Inc
Darren Your concerns about service and integration are well founded and I am sure that other dealers share your viewpoint. In this article I took time to focus on the need for training and to encourage the six horsemen to consider a more collaborative field support service like Microsoft and Cisco have done. Acquisitions are done for many reasons and our industry has seen some products purchased just to have the software mothballed; they bought the customer base. Not all acquisitions come without the pain of new integration points. Also new versions of products can have the same issues of product bugs, I know that the new version of CM will not have some core features that classic CM customers use on its initial release. I wrote the six horseman article to start a conversation. The first part is that a truly integrated suite of products will be pushed by the OEM to save billions on their balance sheets. Secondly, companies seeking to win the prize have to solve the integration issues with smaller companies that provide services that they don't provide. The app store model was discussed but there are other models as well. Thirdly, an integrated suite will take a restructuring of the sales and support team that work at the companies represented by the six horsemen, as well as mid-tier companies. I can't speak for ADP but I would say that many people are watching the industry changes and they are not blind to past mis-steps that are fresh on dealer's minds. In regards with what Dealertrack Technologies may do about their existing CRM, I think that an announcement will be coming by NADA. Once again, if it is not a purchase, and they decide to buy, it will change the dynamics of the CRM space for single solution platforms.
Ken Grody Ford
I'm also wondering what's going to happen with a couple of other new sources of data, specifically vehicle health reports and GPS based location. Whoever ends up owning this data will have huge opportunities. VHR's are a no brainer for both dealers and OEMs. But LBD is much more complex. The winner of that little fight would be in a position to sell in car advertising opportunities. Not to mention the amount of behavioral data that could be collected and analyzed. Somebody is going to do it. Whether it's a smart phone app that talks to the car's systems, or another device like Google Glass, it's just too rich of a data source to ignore.
DrivingSales
Brain, I've been looking forward to reading this since you teased it last week, and it did NOT disappoint. Great work! There are so many good points that were made but one stood out to me; your points about an "open ecosystem". "Our industry may need a third party to define specifications and bring the six horsemen together to agree on communication protocols." I'll take this to the next step and substitute your word "may" for "must". I don't see any other way around this pinch point. Other industries, especially in the financial arenas, have done a very good job of this and our industry will have to embrace standard protocols in order to move forward.
Independent
Larry, Remember the NADA creation STAR (Standards For Technology in Automotive Retail)? That was our industry's 3rd party attempt at formalizing specifications and guidelines for dealers, vendors and OEMs. I think the last update was published in March 2012. I sat in several of those meetings through the years. It's a huge task - close to impossible because of the fragmented nature of the industry. It accomplished "a lot" but no where near what's "needed" in the industry -- at least, what the perceived needs are.
DrivingSales
Cliff, what did you see as stumbling blocks? Was it just the lack of cooperation, or that the gaps were too wide between platforms? Perhaps both?
PCG Consulting Inc
Cliff I am familiar with the STAR program and like the ADP spec which was last revised 13 years ago, there has not been a committed "will" to stick with past ideas and evolve specifications. In this period of software development, one opinion shared to me is that the larger players may not want to participate until the competitor field in narrowed down. The other way it could play out is that the OEM community push a new specification. A credible third party needs to broker the discussions so they are not one-sided or vendor preferenced. Cliff, do you see an "app store" model possible knowing the well funded players in this race?
Independent
Larry, Brian, It was three things, I believe. First, was a lack of corporation. My perspective was that the bigger players were involved mainly to keep the others from getting an upper hand or setting the agenda. Second, the fragmented industry -- almost 40 manufacturers, 23,000 dealers (at the time), more than 1,000 vendors -- meant hundreds, thousands of data silos with just as many protocols, specifications and ways of moving data around. The investment necessary is mind boggling -- not to mention trying to get everyone to agree to a set of standards. Third, technology was changing way too fast but still was not at the point to where standardizing data was really possible. The advent of XML made it seem possible, but still required huge investments. I remember when the giant CRM company Siebel Systems tried to move all of GM and its dealers to one CRM system -- that initiative blew up because of the complexity and costs and that was just one company. (And just ask Sonic, AutoNation or Lithia who have/are standardizing all of their processes on one system the cost and complexity.) Brian, you mention a credible 3rd party -- I think STAR wanted to play that role, but again, the complexity of the job is mind boggling. In addition to STAR, Oxlo tried to become the interface which handled all of the data integration for everybody. But it never really gained industry-wide acceptance. So as the industry moves toward six big players who control the DMS and other relevant systems -- we likely will see, and probably are seeing already, the developments of six or so different data standards around which integration will become much easier in theory.. All of the vendors who want to and have to business with them will have to play by their rules. But why would a Reynolds, ADP or DealerTrack make it easy for companies with competing products integrate with their systems? (And don't give me that garbage that they should because it's better for the dealer. They're going to do what best for their companies and shareholders....and that isn't necessarily what's best or easier for the dealer.) Keep in mind, this is a journalist's perspective - which can be limited because we don't always see all of the facts. But I did cover this pretty hard for several years....
PCG Consulting Inc
Cliff Your perspective and points are well taken. With fierce competition goes bad blood which can often prevent companies from coming to the table. So, maybe it is the first company that provides an open eco-system for the industry will attract the most 3rd party solutions and becomes the leader because of a "first to market" system.
Independent
Brian, There have been several companies that have claimed to have/offer the open eco-system but didn't have the size or scalability to pull it off. Anyone remember Neo-Synergy or the alleged Microsoft efforts from 4-5 years ago? The truth is, it doesn't make sense for a Reynolds or ADP to seriously play ball here, because we're essentially asking them to make things easier for their competitors -- no company in their right mind will do that. It's a balancing act for them -- make things easier for their dealer customers but not for their competitors. The challenge is that each of the six companies you wrote about are going to have some level of that mentality -- and that doesn't make them bad or unfriendly or lacking in innovation. It just means they're protecting their business interests. So maybe there is a DMS that has yet to come to market that will completely upend the current landscape. That someone will have to break the stranglehold ADP and Reynolds has on the market. Nobody on the market today -- Dominion with its "new" system nor Dealertrack have the ability to pull it off. And I'm not even sure they're thinking that way. Awesome article, Brian. Easily the best overview I've seen on the topic. Let's keep the conversation going....
PCG Consulting Inc
It looks like Dealertrack Technologies filled another slot in their UI with the purchase of Auto Accelerator. Word is that they will take the necessary time to do a full integration of this product into their unified UI, which dealers should see sometime next year. Change is in the air...and the 6 Horsemen are ready to turn the next bend!
Showroom Logic
Independent Dealers can give Showroom Logic a TEST Drive, contact Oliver Malcom at omalcom@showroomlogic.com. The proof is in putting our best foot forward by directing Qualified LEADS to your sales staff.olm
No Comments